SectionC3

Must be a little person. Like that guy in wolf of Wall Street who gets wrapped in Velcro and flung against the wall. I feel pretty guilty about laughing at that now.

So you’re an ozempic and coke guy? Or a little person?

Hoax. I eat green vegetables. Maybe you should put down the Jack and ho hos and try it yourself.

Also, Trump had moobs. He might wanna lay off the McNuggets for a bit.

Meanwhile, groceries are getting more expensive. Maybe Trump should golf less and work more.

I donate to one. And help stock one. We can’t keep up.

Food banks are going to have a rough go of it, too. You’ve spent quite a bit of time working on me. But it’s never going to happen. So maybe turn your desires to a different gentleman who might return your affection.

Meanwhile, nobody's doing a thing about the price of groceries. Wasn't that a Day One fix, according to Trump and MAGA?

Sounds like you're a little sweet on me. Weird and sick. Also, to spin this back away from your perhaps closeted, perhaps not, predilections, I believe the initial issue was favorability. Trump is not viewed favorably by a majority of the populous. Nothing in your aged link changes that.

It doesn't say approval. And the body of the article speaks to a handful of specific issues. Sounds like your issue is with the deceptive headline. Which you weren't able to realize is misleading. He can join Cardinal Dolan in yukking it up with Trump, right before the Cardinal whines about Catholic relief cuts caused by the dismantling of USAID. Shame on them both. It is through those tears that the fake Christian B-Man failed to see that Jesus was a brown migrant. I bet St. Peter is sitting at the gates to heaven simply delighted by everything Trump has done and that the fake Christian Right empowered Trump to do.

I know the difference between approval and rating. That's an aggregate of the handful of issued polled. And not what you said it is.

That's weird. Job approval also isn't mentioned in that link. More disinformation from you. Or you're only moderately literate. Maybe it's both. Whatever. Point is that you don't know what you're talking about.

Hoax. You're spreading misinformation. Nowhere in your link is there polling data with respect to Trump's favorability. Which happens to be underwater.

Hoax. He won a plurality of the popular vote. And his favorability is still underwater. Or we could reinstate the top marginal tax rate effective at the time Trump first took office. Who is against that?

Apparently you felt the same way about your elementary school grammar class. LMAO!

I have another one! ICE isn't hitting Trump's numbers. What's up with that? Either Trump overpromised, invented a problem that doesn't exist, or that agency is ineffective and the people assigned to the task of rounding up all of these illegals (like the Haitians, for instance) should be fired. EDIT: Another one is in! The press secretary can't spell Colombia. Not qualified for her job. Obviously a fraud. Adios to her!

Let's start with Mack Hollins and Ty Johnson and go from there. Me neither. As of a couple of years ago, it's my understanding that he worked out here in the off season. And that he likes Elmo's, for what it's worth. Ying and yang of presence in Buffalo for health purposes, I guess.

Washed.

The CIA has low confidence in that theory. What makes you so confident in said theory? DOGE is wasteful. Not cutting anything yet. Maybe they should either do something or cut themselves. Also, eggs are still hugely expensive.

Looks like we have another internet tough guy here. I bet you get all the chicks telling them about how tough you are on the internet and all of the owning of the lives that you do. Attitudes like that are why guys like you make their living on late night scrap and jelly rollers. You’re so tough!

I don’t think anyone disagrees with that. Literally nobody. But tariffs aren’t the way to do it.

That's the thing. The businesses pay the tax up front, and you reimburse the business. And, in that scheme, more of the tax burden is shifted to the middle class. So you're still funding taxes, only your payment is indirect.

Great news man. Keep up the good work. Yeah, it's brilliant if you want to shift the tax burden from the very rich to the very middle class. It's a consumption tax, which people like Steve Forbes have long thought is a wonderful idea. If it's good for Steve Forbes, then it's probably not going to be good for you. And yes, you would pay more to private companies to acquire products. But that's essentially reimbursing the private companies for the up-front tax those companies paid to either import goods or to pay higher rates for unskilled domestic labor to produce those goods.

All fair points. I’ll add only that the great running game was committee-based, with two other guys under contract and one a relatively low priced FA. I’m reluctant to give 11m to a guy who plays less than half of the snaps at his position. And, I’ll superfluously add this: maybe those monies go to McGovern or (less likely) Torrence in a year. Food for thought I suppose.

Based on his effort in the Super Bowl I think he’s checked out.