BB2004

If that is true, there will be a lot of happy faces coming from this board. This would be an excellent move. Very interested to see if this actually pans out.

I think the LT position is our biggest priority. But DT would be fine to if there's a player worth taking. Center would be a third option.

Mr T. I don't think a push for Brees is the answer. After all why didn't we draft him when we had the chance? Instead we waited a few years and drafted Losman. That is our guy. We have to see how he is when he has a offensive line that can give him protection. The only time we have really seen that was in the first game against the Texans.

That will be something if he plays this week. My attention will be on that game if he starts. I didn't see his comeback game against INDI that year that could have been his best game, but the game against the Broncos was painful to watch. I'm glad Marv went back to Alex Van Pelt that game and he gave us a good chance to win. Great clutch kick in that game from 55 yards by Steve Christie to send it into overtime.

I think Denney has outperformed Kelsay for the most part and could be starting in there against Kansas City. As far as DT is concerned, Adams and Edwards are the two guys that we have. I'm not sure you can replace either of them with Bannan or Sape.

Absoultely. We didn't lose becuase of the officials. We lost becuase we played poorly in crunch time. All teams get calls are going to get there share of calls during the season, but its the good teams that take advantage of them.

I think the answer is yes. If we continue to struggle on defense the second half of the season someone will have to take the blame for it. One of the reasons is because this defense had high expectations coming into the season.

The fact that so many people left the stadium and wanted to come back in. I remember reading a post by someone earlier this year about that.

I think you will find some people that will be interested in a story like this.

I like what you have there but I don't think Peters could play LT, I think he'd be better playing RT. One of these days I'd like to see Mike Williams switch over to LT. Hopefully we can get Bentley.

I'll give you the Williams thing but you said they have the makings of a good offensive line. That's why I asked you who are you kidding. Gandy at guard? Maybe as a backup. And yes, I don't think Peters would be a good fit at LT. But if the group that you mentioned is our OL next year, I think we'd have an average line, not a good line.

I agree 100%. I'm not sure why so many people are against Eric Moulds when clearly he's done a tremendous amount for this team and our best wide reciever.

I wonder who's been calling the coin flips for our team

Marcus Spriggs was alright that one season he came in and played RT tackle for us.

He's right on. I'm not sure who mentioned this about a week ago but they said that the game was won between the trenches. That is a clear cut weakness for us. London Fletcher is a good football player but he can only do so much if the people in front of him are at least putting up a fight. Several have criticized Brian Urlacher this year for being overrated. Now that he has a defensive line that is improving he's starting to become the same playmaker he was his rookie season.

Give me a break. You think that will end up being a good offensive line the way you've lined them up? I certainly don't think so. An effective LT is essential and Peters is not that guy. Maybe RT, but LT? Come on. LG with Gandy would be trouble, and I don't think Mike Willaims will be with us next season.

Unfortunately that was the last time we were in the playoffs

I agree on everything except LT. I would put a C there instead of B-.

I get your point. Still, I don't understand how you can get rid of a playmaker like Moulds. If for some reason he doesn't play in a game this year, lets see how good our wide receivers do without him. If I'm wrong about this, I'll be the the first one to apologize to you.

So basically you'd give up one of our best players and 5.5 million for a DT, OL, #1 early draft pick, Clements, replacement for Posey. That's obviously going to cost more than 5.5 million for the 4 or 5 things your asking for.

He's a very good backup quarterback. He gives the team a chance to win. That's what he has proven. I'm not sure why he doesn't throw the ball longer than 20 yards other than maybe twice a game, but maybe that's the play calling.

What would you spend it on?

That would truly be a bad thing if we cut Eric Moulds. The question is why? To save 5.5 million and spend it on what?

Agreed with the second line of your post.