Coach Tuesday

It's not over until we find out what the Lyft drivers of Orlando, Florida think of Josh Allen.

"Responsible" is a stretch. Littman squeezed every last nickel out of the state and county and secured a beautiful parachute for himself in the process.

His teammates should totally troll him with vacuums with Beiber’s face pasted on them.

So kind of a permanent Stage 18, then, for eball?

Quote is from 2017. Good analysis in the article.

Lorenzen's Lifelong Battle with Weight

Carwell Gardner, in an airport. Not the Buffalo airport.

Oh boy.

Can we also have a separate set of individual threads discussing what Josh Allen thinks about various municipalities? Someone wanna start with: "Chicago Josh Allen"? I hear he likes it, but oh boy does it get cold in the winter!

100% false. But moderation is really the key. There are no real shortcuts. Just: eat less. That’s it. Eat less. Eat less. Eat. Less. Back to Lorenzen - he was part of some incredible games at UK. Wasn’t he in that insane thriller that ended on a Hail Mary? Sad to see him die so young, whatever the reason.

Must be nice to have the luxury of learning on the job.

Never change Tipster, never change.

The opposite.

Um, position value dude?

The point? That no one can prove what would’ve happened in an alternative universe where Sammy wasn’t dealt? I mean...

Now I know you're just Teefing my Gugny. Read the article I linked. It quotes actual first-hand sources. It's pretty clear what happened. The Rams' Plan A was to keep Sammy. They tried. KC offered him $30M guaranteed and he bolted. They then turned to using their #23 pick to acquire a replacement and reached out to the Patriots about Cooks. At that point their options were more limited and they did what they had to do. Doesn't mean Sammy "didn't live up to expectations, so they decided to look for wr help elsewhere." You're pushing a false narrative (a) because you find it fun, and (b) because you don't really follow football too closely.

By your “logic” Cooks sucks because the Patriots were willing to trade him. Stop being so dense. From the horse’s mouth. Sammy was Plan A.

They valued Cooks more. That doesn’t mean they “let Sammy go” because he “sucked.” You people bad argue.

I know it was widely reported that the Rams aggressively tried to keep him and multiple teams tried to get him and the Chiefs gave him a monster contract. Nevertheless your little sidecar Teef is opining that the Rams “let him go” because he underperformed. It’s an incredibly weak take. I like you better as “The Funny Gugny.”

Stick to the comedy.

Maybe they wanted injury protections and the Chiefs were more flexible? Maybe they didn’t want to commit the $30 MILLION guaranteed that the Chiefs ponied up? The Rams (and other teams, including I believe the Cowboys) also were bidders.

Lies.

Sure it's possible - but since there is no objective evidence of it, it sure makes it hard to change minds... (not that Americans are persuaded by evidence that disagrees with their view of the world - they simply disregard it as "fake news").

We gonna hit 100 pages on this? I guess this is what happens when a respected local writer offers "high praise" for a yet-unproven regime during a critical offseason.

You have two of the best offensive programs in the NFL in a bidding war over his services, with the Chiefs willing to pay him a huge contract just to be their #2. The ONLY legitimate gripe about Sammy is his injury history. If he can't stay healthy this year, he's probably toast. If he can, I predict he's going to put up monster numbers and the Anti-Vaxxers like you will be scarcely heard from.