Simon

Yeah, he's not here to shovel, the man is here to punt!

While this is true, it also means that at some point tomorrow he's probably going to make an upside down, one-handed, behind the back catch between three defenders on 3rd/20.

It doesn't help that Benford is out there running around in a #47

The reason I said nevermind is because I knew it would just be more of your weird agenda that didn't make any sense. Assumption confirmed.

Illness? Shed that virus, brother!

No wonder you're so ******* cranky....

People compare you to Nick Wright? Yeah, I guess I could see that.

OK, now I'm getting it. I guess I forget that the bottom of the upper deck is sort of closer to ground level outside. Thanks! P.S. Some day, will you call me "Blondie"?

Yeah, that is pretty much what I'm getting at. Do you think they have chutes that go directly from the upper deck all the way down to the field? How would something like that support the weight of that much snow over that much space? I would think that shoveling the upper deck down into the lower bowl, then shoveling the lower bowl down onto the field would make the most sense. Although maybe when the accumulation is that massive, shoveling the upper deck into the lower bowl creates a whole new set of problems?

Those are a couple good points that may belie the assumption that the entire stadium will be done anyways.

This explains so much. The fact that you actually know what trolls and clickwhores are saying, and are then eager to come here and repeat it provides a ton of insight into why you've been such a terrible fit here.

Yeah, I get that. But if you're working under the assumption that the entire stadium will be done anyways, why not shovel downward?

Because the original poster has a lengthy history of starting inane threads on subjects already being discussed elsewhere, that seem to exist for no other purpose than to draw attention to himself.

You can bet that the coaches have looked at film of ALL their matchups. What point are you even trying to make here? Actually, scratch that; I don't even want to know.

Wondering why they wouldn't complete the upper deck first and then do the lower bowl?

I think this is hilarious. Oops, I now see Ned already got it. Oh well, funny enough to repeat, imo.

Your calm snark is not problematic. At least not to anyone who doesn't already have it coming.

The man knew what a must-win is.

Stolen from a McDermott pregame speech?

Those aren't rules; those are lifestyles. 🤙

Awesome; I'll be over for brunch! Is it cool if I bring some friends?

My computer is in a different room than my TV so I occasionally find myself running in to type an observation between plays. I usually try to avoid it though, so that I don't get dragged into any mod foolishness while I'm trying to watch the game. Occasionally I see a problematic poster bitching about the game being over in the 1st qrtr and I do them a favor and lock them out because I am a selfless, thoughtful and empathetic man with a heart of gold who always does what's best for others.

He's actually tried it a few times in games previously. Dr Dawk had a good post with some videos in a thread we had going after the game vs KC earlier this year.

It certainly doesn't look like he would have been aware, although the guy does have what is possibly the greatest peripheral vision I've ever seen so it's hard to discount it entirely.