Mikie2times

I heard him actually talking in the interview and it seemed this way. It didn't seem like he was upset with us. More the situation and circumstances that forced us to respond as we did.

Correct. I was just commenting on that Tampa thing how low his average depth of target was. So I was pondering if he could be a good fit to be featured in our horrible WR screen game because in that Tampa game he was rather good at it, but agree, I think Tampa plays off and mostly zone. It was probably more Bowles alignment than Davis excelling in that area.

I voted no, because while I wish he could be a 4 to 5 with us, he never will be. We will give him starter reps. Defer the real problem another year. I don't want him on the roster because it forces us to invest in viable options at the position.

Sort of interesting how well he did the one time we featured him in screens and with a low ADOT (TB). To your point, I don't know if that means we should change anything as far as trying to get him the ball in those screens. Just interesting. I never was arguing for more?

The main thing it tells me is when targeted he isn't converting a lot of those targets into catches. Which could be because most of his targets are downfield. Which again, indicates his route tree being more of a impactor to his catch% than his hands. For me, I would rather see Gabe as a 4 or 5 WR. With his route tree, he actually fits that mold rather well but I don't believe that would ever happen with us and fear if we did retain him we would still utilize him more in the passing game than a 4 or 5 based on familiarity and the rest our WR core sucking. The fact that we can't get Gabe going is an issue, but it was always going to be an issue. We can't afford to build an offense around getting a guy with 3-4 routes going. He's also our best blocking WR so it's not optimal to try his hand on screens (although he is physical and in some ways it was actually nice seeing a little of that vs Tampa). The fact that Diggs is performing about as bad as he has in his Buffalo career the last 3 games is a problem. A really big problem given how limited our options are. I hope he can get it figured out or heal or correct whatever the driver is. His performance has been bad and you can see it, but it's all over his advanced stats as well.

Having unprotected sex in college while intoxicated is like the goal of half the college population. That is the only thing he did. I would say that makes him a pretty normal 18-20 something. He didn't know she was a minor and probably assumed she had a right to not have unprotected sex if she didn't want to.

I mean, college party, didn’t know she was in high school. Why is he a bad guy exactly?

And what does that 36% tell you? I’m curious how you interpret that number.

Actual data that shows how bad Diggs is playing? What would you like me to do?

It is frustrating to see how many people look at catch% and have literally no clue how that stat works. Then they think because that % is low it must mean Gabe has bad hands. I literally want to slam my head into a concrete wall with the number of posters who reference this. Having said that his catch% is a by product of deeper routes and deeper routes are a by product of his poor route tree which is the actual problem with Gabe. His hands, while not perfect, are not even close to as big an issue as how limited he is with his route structure. If all this was already discussed my bad.

Diggs has only had 7 games in a Buffalo uniform with a drop% above 15%. Drop% is just drops/targets. He has been at 15%+ 2 of the last 3 weeks. Including his highest rate of 25% against the Jets. Allen rating when throwing to Diggs the last 3 weeks has been 44.9, 57.8, 68. This gives Allen 2 of his worst 4 ratings throwing to Diggs, and 3 of his worst 9 in just the last 3 games. This, over Diggs career with Buffalo.

I'm just playing around being dumb. 😄

I always thought Wayne was a good feminine name. Him her he she has point about you it.

You can see so clearly on this tighter film what he does well and doesn't do well. Long, powerful, great release, sneaky fast with a long stride. Poor acceleration, agility, sloppy footwork, route running. I'm not joking, but it would have probably been in his best interest to add 25 pounds and play TE. His skills are TE skills. That's not insulating the man. If anything we would be saying he's an athletic freak at TE. But at WR he's just not twitchy enough.

It would be amazing if he want to Tampa 😂 But several of those teams would be a good fit. Tampa, New Orleans, even Atlanta.

Really gifted voice. I've never heard anybody like him and it helped make his roles more diverse and enjoyable.

I have no kids. But hypothetically if I had a daughter and she brought this guy home I would kick her out of the house with prejudice.

He's going to be hell bent on restoring his image and the only way to do that is get back to form. This was by far his best game. I expect we will see improvement transpire as the season unfolds, we will have to keep him based on cap hit next year and he will likely have one blowout final 10+ sack year in 2024. Then we will part ways in 2025.

They could pay 200 refs 200k per year and it wouldn't even be 1% of revenue.

This photo was taken at AT&T stadium while Wrolstad was seen talking to Jerry Jones.

Is this the only task on earth you don't get much better at with year round training? That would have to be the NFL's stance to not have full time refs. That or they just don't want the additional cost.

You can work out some punters

Probably CJ Spiller. The way Thurman used to run them, it was one of the prettiest plays in the game. I would think we would want to have some more plays that take advantage of how aggressive DL are. Screens, reverses etc.

That's like asking your girlfriend if she's mad before your girl catches you in bed with another woman and holding her to her original statement.

Bill B: How can I add more Tight Ends without calling it a TE?