NoHuddleKelly12

Mac needs to be treading lightly imho, as this is going to come back around on him, bet.

But didn’t they just win their Super Bowl in Week 1?! 🤔

“Allow myself to introduce…myself…”

I’ll be too busy chewing my nails worrying about our 4th Q defense to bother about who’s singing. 🤷🏼‍♂️

Or alternatively, he took his new bride literally when she said, “Take all your man cave stuff outside this house!” 🤔

This is definitely classic. We get all hyped for a guy only to see them decide it’s just a game and want to walk away with all limbs intact??!! I’m still ticked about P. Harvin too.

NFL +. Prolly a free trial available for that as well.

I nominate this post for post of the day—perfectly encapsulates what we should be taking away from this point in the season, imho.

The Kelly botched snap broken play rollout/helmet falling down TD to Lofton as Kelly remarked, showed everybody what type of day they were in for where the Bills could do no wrong…simply awesome 👏!

I believe the mantra from the pitchfork wielders was something along the lines of, “can’t he ever run the ball, or utilize the TE position??”

If only it was training camp/preseason Nathan Peterman brain!!! 🙇

More of this please!

LAMP Alert 🚨: What will happen is that clearly I need to trade him away from my FF team as that roster becomes kryptonite in real life…my first 2 draft picks this year were Josh and then Kelce. Mic drop.

I’ll vouch for this lol

Yes that could be true as well.

I was simply responding to your post prior to mine, wherein you said, “Trotter isn't really publicly declaring this. It's buried in a suit…” To which I responded there is no such thing as burying something in a public filing where names this prominent are featured.

But you realize it won’t be the government asked to decide on the accuracy of those statements, right? It will be a 6-12 person civil jury made up of people like you and me…I would hope they are in fact bound by those presumptions, otherwise they don’t even need to hear any evidence (which in turn must pass basic rules of reliability/admissibility) first? Of course you’re entitled to your opinions, but I’m just asking the board at large to consider that what happens in the court of public opinion often turns out to be premature and just flat wrong after legal process has wrapped.

Ha ha, this is totally what most of my family in western Pa sounds like—“do they sell first downs down at Levin’s?” Classic.

Based on a self-serving unconfirmed hearsay allegation contained within a lawsuit? Let’s see if the suit even survives a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment first before we cast the first stones?

And you would be wrong in Terry’s case. He started his company from scratch on the back of a $7,500.00 loan. Hardly the stuff of silver spoons and Vanderbilt type legacies… https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_Pegula

Soft and fuzzies are his middle names! 😝 https://x.com/SharpFootball/status/1574130467443458054?s=20

Respectfully, it should—otherwise we pillory others based on anything said by anyone regardless of source or any semblance of reliability? That’s something we should all push back against, regardless of your opinions.

I’m confused—you asked why we should start with the default of believing a defendant over an allegation to start…so I explained why that’s fundamental due process?

Suits = public record. He or his atty knew darn right that naming names of NFL owners would get picked up by the ESPNS of the world as well as message boards like this—no such thing as “buried” in a high profile suit. Otherwise why even insert incendiary nuggets like these??

Because all plaintiffs have the burden of proof, all defendants get presumptions of facts in their favor (bedrock due process principles)