ngbills

Every team is getting hit. Can’t blame it on covid. Blame losses to pit and jac for starters. Ten win last night with half its OL and still no Henry.

Both these teams know how to throw slants routes and get the ball to guys in space. And how many OL were out for tenn? Still look d way better than ours.

It’s gonna be a lot of quick slants, screens, crossing patterns. Most college qbs can throw these passes let alone nfl. Still need guys that can cover.

This CAR that people want to praise so much gave up 29, 33 and 27 the past three weeks to ATL, MIA and WFT. Don’t give me that it was impressive what we did. I am happy and take the win. But our O is so clearly out of sync. Even when Josh has teams his mind thinks he has guys all around him. The run game has some life but I don’t get why we insist on delayed handoffs. Don’t get the lack of slants. Allen is only completing line 90% of them yet we through only a couple a game.

I would not have complained if they tried 5 straight times to start the game.

We don’t

Allen had two bad throws. Not all on OL.

Same story. Different game. D came to play but O not showing up. Allen two bad passes and fumble.

Footwork

Makes no sense. Delaying every game would support this reasoning. All delaying does is give teams more time to have guys test negative not stop spread. And a couple days is all that is needed? Sounds like - let’s see if we can get baker to test negative. Makes no sense. Delaying every game would support this reasoning. All delaying does is give teams more time to have guys test negative not stop spread. And a couple days is all that is needed? Sounds like - let’s see if we can get baker to test negative. While we are changing things. Can we go back and look at the TB game. Upon further review PI called. Bills ball 1st and goal on the 1 with 30 seconds in the 4th.

Josh ankle still hurts a bit and need Dawkins time to test negative. Can we postpone until Monday too?

I just dont like "rewarding" a large outbreak. Not that an outbreak is always due to negative actions. I just dont trust the NFL to be fair in deciding what teams have to play and what teams get to reschedule. If you want a level playing field they just need to follow the rules of testing positive. If the Bills had 40 guys break their ankles would they reschedule or tell the Bills to scour practice squads for a full roster?

Dont like rescheduling. If you cant play you forfeit. Otherwise the NFL is now deciding when to reschedule or not. So if only Allen is out vs the Pats we would play. But in other cases because a bunch of guys ae out you get more time for guys to play.

Honestly should not be hard to do or playoffs are pointless anyway. NE is over-rated and we better beat CAR, NYJ and ATL at home. Lose any of those with the season on the line we dont deserve it.

Same here. Have not seen anything from the guy in the limited action we have seen.

No solution gets this right. Change the rule to 15 and they still get it wrong, just cost less yards. Even if it becomes a sky judge ruling those guys can get it wrong less but how do you determine when you review? On any given play there can be some bumping etc. Do they review every receiver on every pass play? Or review only the plays called then it does not help for no calls like on Diggs. When I get pissed at refs like this week I want them to just get rid of PI altogether. Just let it be a free for all so at least the refs cant impact the outcome. Will change the game quite a bit obviously. You will need big physical WR's and TE's or run plays to create space.

Bills beat Pats they are basically guaranteed. Well assuming they win the "easy" ones. With Bills going to 3-1 there are really two things that stand out that could help knock the Bills out. 1) NE loses to Indy. Sadly we need to root for the Pats here 2) KC loses to CIN Sucks to be dependent on both NE and KC.

Josh plays first half. Bills up 28-0 and Mitch plays second half.

I will say it again. Exactly why we should have been all in for the measly $275K for Z Cunningham. LB is one of our thinnest positions.

How did I imply we won in spite of him? Said nothing close to that. Someone commented that we would only have 3 wins with out Josh this year. That is what I disagreed with. We won many games this year not needing him to be great. We win those games with Mitch as QB. Do we have a chance beating a good team with Mitch? Not likely. With Josh we can beat any team on any day. With Mitch or another avg QB we can beat most bad teams on most days.

Not if the first half team shows up. The same one that played vs Jax, Indy and Ne. Not Indy or pit

Our defense played well the second half today and last week. Would you have taken the D holding TB to 27? I would have expected we need 30 or more to beat them. Early bad play, conservative nonsense cost us. Not on the D or Allen.

Allen is the best player on this team. I don’t blame him for the 7-6 record. If we are being really look at our 7 wins. Go watch the replays if you need to. With Mitch we are minimum 6-7. The D dominated in those wins and the opponents played awful. Honestly I can’t recall a game we have won that was a game that you would say both teams played well. Hence our record in close games.

That sucks. Bad call on refs but someone left there zone. Still a first down but not td.

Disagree. What games have we won this year because of him? Not saying I don’t want him but that just is not true this year. He has kept us close but a bad loss does not count any different than a close one. We are 7-6 and our 7 wins were mostly easy ones.