Lfod

I'd probably rather drink a beer with Nate Peterman than try to stomach being in the presence of his haters on this board.

I've been out on this season. I still check in on the results of games but that's about it. That's probably why I'm not all mad about it looking to fire everyone and kick some one in the Peterman.

Classic deflection of personal responsibility. We should all be NFL quarter backs because of Peterman.

Tyrods on the bench in Cleveland and I told you that would happen.

Did we get the obligatory posts from the people who don't like the name BillsMafia yet? Didn't want a post to slip by you fine folk.

That's a bold prediction.

Right now no Bills QB scores points for the Bills, so I guess you like to ask questions with painfully obvious answers.

I like McDermott but I don't see any growth with this team offensively. To go into next season without any offensive success is just not going to be good for the future of the team. To have absolutely no foundation doesn't lead me to believe it will appear from nothing. Unfortunately as much as I like him the team is becoming the punchline of a lot of jokes. If the offense doesn't show at least something before the season is out I predict it won't be good until maybe the next HC.

I just can't imagine all the winning that would be going on if the team had been more diligent in getting that all pro QB Anderson before the season was toast. Shame on you Beane...

I'm on the edge of my seat with anticipation of who will start at QB this week.

Wake me up when something happens the opposite of terrible for the offense.

Did anyone mention Colin Kaepernick in this thread yet. It's an obligation.

I'm not counting on Shady anymore. It would of been nice to have the run game be something the team can lean on.

38 Patriots 7 Bills Nathan Peterman comes into the game late after Anderson gets injured and scores the only touchdown.

I didn't expect much from Anderson. I wouldn't call it a successful start. I'll give Anderson credit for stepping in and trying to move an offense that has a track record of bad. The meltdown at the end of that game specifically with him was not good. The interceptions and fumbles all in a short amount of time is a thing a QB like Peterman gets written off for in his first start or am I wrong? So am I wrong to believe Anderson could just repeat a rapid meltdown in the Patriots game? As for Peterman yes I fully expect him to throw interceptions. I also know that he can lead a TD drive in the NFL. He has the capability when not throwing interceptions to do that. I like Peterman a lot. I'm disappointed in him but if I'm the coach that started him I'm still the same coach your asking why I keep him in there and the same coach you may fire for it. Anderson can start good luck to him. Chances are I'll see my boy Peterman by the end of the game. It was already dangerously close to that.

The ideas people want to do right now are moves that needed to be made before now. It's unlikely the status quo changes to much.

I think as long as people keep talking like trading Sammy was a mistake you will have others pointing out how Sammy isn't a #1. On topic: The Vikings game is that glass is half full moment of the season for me. I look at it like McDermott can coach a struggling team to victory.

I probably don't like Rex more but I didn't have to see Hue Jackson as my teams HC. I always saw Rex as the washed up Jets HC. Never once was I fooled by the celebrity he was.

I'm not shocked that people want to write off breaking the drought the season after it happened. I guess the highlight of the playoffs is an Andy Dalton touchdown pass as if it was the sole reason instead of just one determining factor. It's ok to feel that way but it's also leaving out the other team victories like they never happened. To me it was a championship defense and a limp noodle offense all season. It wasn't a "fluke" to me. I guess it's because I saw an entire season and not living in the moment with Andy Dalton. Like the Bills beating teams that people didn't think they could beat. It wasn't any secret this team had no offense coming into the season and yet people are still surprised. Different options were available and McDermott decided to be skimpy and just ride out the season. People are reacting as if this wasn't a bite the bullet year and the offensive choices that were made we're suddenly going to turn the offense into a scoring machine. AJMcarron? It's obvious no splashes were made to solve the short term. McDermott told people the plan and what to expect and the plan is on track despite people not liking the pain. It could be 10 years from now and McDermott could be gone and still be the only HC to take the Bills to the playoffs. I didn't get the Jim Kelly years. McDermott is my Jim Kelly as far as Bills being successful.

I'm not seeing a lot of loyalty this season. It might just be the people who want everyone fired are the loudest. I don't think it's time for heads to roll yet.

I didn't ever think Peterman gets another shot. I understand the motivation to stay with Anderson. I don't fully agree but the show must go on. Get well soon Josh.

All I want this season is a Tre White interception on Tom Brady. The second thing I want is a noticeable development of Josh Allen. If that doesn't happen I'll light the torch and join the mob.

What you say is fair and I don't disagree. This discussion about Peterman or Anderson will dissapear when Allen is back. I think the reason Peterman is even in the discussion is because Anderson didn't get the job done. I honestly don't believe in either of them and I'm not sure Tom Brady can make this offense run. I'd have to see it to believe it.