Richard Noggin

I agree with #1 for sure, #2 maybe a little, and #3 for sure based on 2022 on-field issues/inconsistencies. The difficulty in this debate, to paraphrase one of my favorite late-20th century US authors, is the subjectivity in: What We Talk About When We Talk About #2 WRs. Is it about an up-and-comer with all-around flashes of #1 potential? Is it about a positional (boundary) prototype of traits and skills? Or is it simply about a reliable receiving target (x, y, z, TE...whatever) who sees the 2nd most targets and produces? What we're really talking about with the Bills, of course, is if Gabe Davis is an acceptable starting #2 BOUNDARY receiver. Can he effectively hurt a defense that rolls coverage to the other side, i.e., win 1-on-1s and catch the damned ball. The problem is: we've seen him succeed in spectacular ways, and we've seen him struggle in ugly ways. None of us really KNOWS how Davis will produce in 2023. But maybe someone else steps up and into the functional, statistical #2 receiving role from a different alignment/position. Was my original point.

I have decent season tickets, but I do NOT anticipate extending them beyond 2025. Anything's possible, but there is only so much I can pay.

I think EVERY highlighted play shows Floyd aligned at 9T or even wider. Erik utters the phrase, "wide alignment," repeatedly. So obviously that's where Floyd flourishes. Can really use his speed, length, and flexibility. The Bills weren't really much of a "wide-9" defensive front under Frazier, right? Love this new weapon.

Precursor to a 3-month PIP (performance improvement plan) for the corporate crowd.

Processing speed is mentioned specifically, though. That's not a preparation thing exactly.

I, too, will miss him. But the only colors the Bills showed by not wanting to extend an undersized RB with great lateral agility but no speed and below average pass catching were prudence and vision. Singletary has some undeniable cutback juice. But he also has a documented lack of consistent up-field explosion (his 2nd offseason training program, I think, will google later, was openly devoted to converting his lateral elusiveness into actual yards gained). He admitted on record then that his mindset needed an adjustment to focus more on using his skills to move forward (paraphrasing). That's troubling. As a testament to Singletary's growth mindset, I think we saw glimpses of that rookie explosion in years 3 and 4, but it was eventually obvious to just about any objective observer last season that James Cook is a much more dynamic offensive threat. Even Moss had a couple prior moments that flashed elements (physicality/pass catching) lacking in Devin's game. His Houston deal is totally reasonable for a guy of his skillset, but he has limitations and inconsistencies that make him VERY replaceable.

I don't have quite enough evidence to offer my unqualified assessment of Dorsey's play-calling, yet, but Daboll was SO bad at marrying the pass and the run and putting defensive players (esp. pass rushers) on their heels throughout a game. Just NO sequencing. It was always so deliberate and pre-meditated with him. He installed and built upon a really nice scheme of passing concepts, but often, to my eye, failed to keep things balanced in a way that helps offensive linemen, for example, do their jobs well.

Thank you for this. Hilarious. While he DID have a career day against NE man coverage, including some truly great catches, this highlight reel doesn't quite have the shine it once teased. Should have included a reel of him against Miami in that week 17 laugher to drive the point home.

Just scrolled up to see you really DID thumbs-down me! Woulda been WAY cooler, and more authentic, without the explanation...

It's interesting that posters here don't usually just say, "Find it yourself, loser!" then boo you relentlessly. Guess I prefer the gameday stadium experience.

It's awfully positive up there ⬆️; almost...too positive

Ken Dorsey never gets the recognition he deserves smh

Sure seems like modern offenses spend less and less time attacking the parts of the field most impacted by ILB play?

I have often supported Beane's stated goal to field a perennial contender as a valid counterargument against going "all-in" or mortgaging the future now that we have this fairly expensive franchise centerpiece in place longterm. I no longer have any patience for that nonsense. (And I think on some levels, Beane has used that more conservative, "sustainability" refrain only when the really aggressive personnel acquisitions don't come to fruition. After all, he IS the GM who signed a 32/33 year-old HoF pass-rushing/edge legend (a "ledgend"™️) to a 6-year deal despite bad/at-risk knees (as determined by medical imaging team). That's not a draft-and-develop, re-sign-your-own, Pitt or GB type of move. And I'm here for it.) Win ONE championship. Just win ONE effing championship. THEN we can worry about the future. (I would be fine with just one, to be honest. The catharsis of that alone would be powerful and lasting.)

Say what now? (I am honestly missing your meaning.)

I'm not the gatekeeper of potentially racist names/mascots. I'm just a guy who thinks the name "Redskins" was worthy of removal due to its unfortunate origins. Let's not turn this into some kind of culture war, okay?

It's not about a specific person being offended; I'm no morality scold. But sometimes seemingly innocuous language can contribute to historical blind spots and ongoing ignorance. If history is written by the victors, then so, too, is our language. We are well equipped to evolve beyond the atrocities of our past, no? A sports team name should not evoke genocide/apartheid/ethnic cleansing. I think that's fair... I favor the WFT moniker, personally. Has an old-school feel and is appropriately easy to confuse with WTF.

Redskins has a very specific and violent meaning. It refers to native scalps gathered as trophies and/or currency.

Dion Dawkins has always been surprisingly nimble for a big guy, especially when dancing and also when catching TDs. His RAS is initially supportive of this stance, until we realize it's calculated for an OG instead of an OT...(I snipped an infographic of Dawkins scoring an 8.8 but it's as an OG and it's too large a file to attach for some reason: https://ras.football/2019/12/29/dion-dawkins-ras/). I don't think it's wrong to call attention to a generally shared perception of Dawkins's recently (2022/23) increased BMI.

Have you ever been told what "Redskin" refers to? I'll wait...

I've had multiple "made" men at the W Ferry location openly poop all over the pizza sold at the stadium; there was at some point a schism within the family that has the national LaNova's brand selling out (which ships and licenses wings and pizza at a prolific-enough rate to allow for entirely above-board operations since a while back)...the old-timers do NOT enjoy seeing their brand's quality bastardized at the stadium while also price-gouging WNYers at the same time. The younger generation is not exactly concerned with quality. Say what you will about the generation still running the actual restaurants, at least he's there every day, actually concerned about his customers. Such a shame what Bills fans have had available to them inside the stadium for a LONG time.

Say MORE...(DM if necessary)

Solid post. One disagreement: the Bills didn't keep 10 DL on the initial 53 in 2022. They went with 9 (5 DE + 4 DT). So 10 can't really be standard, can it? **upon further, last-second googling, while they kept 9 DL in 2022, they actually rostered 11 in 2021 (making 10 the mean, or standard, here). 11 is kind of crazy, especially given the "uneven" impact the DL was having on most games. They have also, interestingly, kept 7 WRs each of the last two seasons while the TE number went from 2 to 3. ***while they did roster 10 OL in 2020, they have since kept 9 two seasons in a row. You are correct that 8 is not enough. (I might have been conflating the gameday active roster rules that allow for two additional roster spots if a team activates only 7 OL? I might be mistaken still on this point...)