-
Posts
4,313 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Richard Noggin
-
Miami probably shouldn't have too many 1 PM or 4 PM games at home in the first 6 weeks of the season, tbh. Or conversely, the rules about sideline fans/shade could just be adjusted to prevent dangerous and unethical gamesmanship. I'm not aware of the Bills actively preventing visiting opponents from accessing vital heating equipment during extreme cold weather games. Why is Miami allowed to block medically vital sideline cooling equipment during extreme hot weather games? Because their sideline is shaded, they can then medically imperil their opponents? Crazy.
-
Big Badazz Beane on Pat McAfee today
Richard Noggin replied to Chandler#81's topic in The Stadium Wall
Finally, someone with eyes that see. Shavers vs Virgil (vs Shenault vs Hamler) for WR5 in 2025 lol. Draft WR and OL and RB in 2026 like an offensive mirror to 2025's defensive picks. -
Is Ed Oliver still on the team by September?
Richard Noggin replied to HOUSE's topic in The Stadium Wall
-
Bills 5th Round Pick (#2) : Jackson Hawes - TE - Georgia Tech
Richard Noggin replied to Simon's topic in The Stadium Wall
-
Agree for the most part with where you're both going here. Beane HAS in fact invested in receiving targets with Kincaid and Coleman in the draft and Samuel and now Palmer in FA. Problem is, the results haven't been immediate or impactful. Shakir was both drafted and re-signed, though, so that's another much more successful target acquired and developed. Beane is now taking at least one more season to let his coaches maximize the aforementioned investments, with maybe one more addition to the room at some point in 2025. With the way Royals and Horton fell, of course we're frustrated that we didn't get one. But I think it was maybe more egregious to miss out on adding at least one more WR each of the past two drafts. This 2025 draft was at least properly milked for its specific depth at DL and DB. In a way, Beane is mirroring top NFC teams more than his AFC counterparts, with his emphasis on stocking the trenches overall and the defense in particular. I was happy to see him triple up on DLs and DBs. Go ahead and just fix those pipelines in a draft really well suited to doing so.
-
Miami Herald: Dolphins players have turned on McDaniel
Richard Noggin replied to Einstein's topic in The Stadium Wall
What if the league's DCs caught up with McDaniel's offense faster than he (and his roster) have been able to evolve. What if Miami's defensive roster was absolutely gutted by poor management and brutal injury runs. Those things are somewhat outside McDaniel's responsibility. But also, eff him and his unethical owner and the Dolphins overall. They get what they deserve. -
Elijah Moore Visiting the Bills today
Richard Noggin replied to bills742's topic in The Stadium Wall
Oof. -
What positions we prioritize in the draft: Part 2
Richard Noggin replied to Mikie2times's topic in The Stadium Wall
BUT DID YOU INCLUDE THE PICKS SPENT ON DIGGS -
Bills 5th Round Pick (#2) : Jackson Hawes - TE - Georgia Tech
Richard Noggin replied to Simon's topic in The Stadium Wall
Your explanation continues to evolve and become more convincing, if I'm being honest. I was initially arguing only a strict statistical rebuttal to your claim of "very average" athleticism. The published RAS is nearly a quartile above average. That's irrefutable. However, you continue to erode my faith in that metric for Hawes, and now I'm sad. Thanks. -
Was totally kidding, but being way too subtle about it, apparently. You are a gentleman and a scholar.
-
Hey gang, been offline all day. What did I miss?
-
Bills 4th Round Pick : Deone Walker - DT - Kentucky
Richard Noggin replied to Simon's topic in The Stadium Wall
Just don't get caught. Depends if his patient gets caught? -
Elijah Moore Visiting the Bills today
Richard Noggin replied to bills742's topic in The Stadium Wall
I mean, you're responding to a Chiefs fan, so...classic Chiefs Planet really -
Bills 5th Round Pick (#2) : Jackson Hawes - TE - Georgia Tech
Richard Noggin replied to Simon's topic in The Stadium Wall
Problem with your conclusion is that size and strength very much are part of the athleticism equation in football. Being bigger and stronger in such a leverage-based contact sport IS necessarily better. So explosiveness at a larger size = athleticism (in part). He's not terribly fast, for sure. And I guess we don't about agility scores. But being big, strong, and explosive is a nice trifecta for a Y/F TE coming in to block and play teams (and run a few routes here and there). -
Unless the Bills can get another year of maximum effort out of Jimbo as he makes his final case for $15-20M AAV in FA. Beane has shown a consistent comfort-level with guys playing on 1-year or expiring deals. I agree that trading him now would be the Patriots/Chiefs method of maximizing value, but there is another way to derive future value while also maximizing that last contract season: play it out. Jimbo can ball out one more time by maximizing his freshness with ~40% usage and earn that deal he seeks. The Bills can get that cheapish 4th year production AND a boost to their 2026 compensatory equation when Jimbo signs elsewhere. Or if he doesn't find his market, they could potentially have him back at a price they deem reasonable (doubt that one). RBs playing hardball while still under contract hasn't worked out GREAT for them in recent history. Cook is dynamic with the ball in his hands, no doubt. Special, really. But he's not a $15-20M guy IMDO (in my dumble opinion™️). One could make the argument that he's not worth it simply because the Bills are still paying too much to many former players who weren't worth it either.
-
Bills 5th Round Pick (#1) : Jordan Hancock - CB - The Ohio State
Richard Noggin replied to Simon's topic in The Stadium Wall
And separately, what do you all think about moving Tre White to S? -
Bills 4th Round Pick : Deone Walker - DT - Kentucky
Richard Noggin replied to Simon's topic in The Stadium Wall
Absolute beast in these highlights. Saw him line up everywhere from 1 to 7T. Menace in 2023.- 432 replies
-
- 12
-
-
-
-
WR value, in their eyes, didn't line up with how the board fell. That much is clear. Where fans are upset about this is in how the Bills set up their board in the first place, which always seems to undervalue WR (and WR speed) compared to other positions.
-
Bills 5th Round Pick (#2) : Jackson Hawes - TE - Georgia Tech
Richard Noggin replied to Simon's topic in The Stadium Wall
But which numbers indicate he isn't athletic? Or, are you applying your own eye test instead? RAS just formulates a number based on comparable athletic testing. Those tests are not the only way to determine athleticism, but they are the only way to objectively compare raw athleticism. -
Bills 6th Round Pick (#1) : Dorian Strong - CB - VA Tech
Richard Noggin replied to Simon's topic in The Stadium Wall
I think your point is fair, in that many of us fans and possibly many in the Bills org would have preferred to draft speed/production to WR room earlier on day three (Royals and Horton and hung around for a while, among others; but then again, why DID they go later than commonly projected online?). I suspect the Bills actually LOVE their WR depth entering 2025, with a top 4 of Palmer, Shakir, Coleman, and Samuel, plus Virgil and Shavers and Prather and Shenault and Hamler. There is some "hope as a strategy" happening here wrt Coleman and Palmer, and the depth guys, but you have to draft and ultimately count on development at certain positions each year. Hence the importance of drafting. Took 3rd round Spencer Brown a few years to sort himself out, and didn't always look promising along the way. Bernard was a perceived liability in his 2nd season when injuries thrust him into starting role. Maybe Allen helps a bunch of his skill guys "play up" and maybe some of them also simultaneously "step up." I'm excited to see if Kincaid and Coleman take needed steps, or if next year's draft goes heavy on offensive weapons. Probably should either way, just to maintain healthy pipelines. RB and WR and possibly even TE are on track to have unfilled slots in 2026. It's ultimately understandable that fans see Houston and Kansas City and Green Bay and Cincinnati and even Baltimore (and others) investing MUCH more heavily in the WR position than Buffalo has, and they get frustrated. I've been hoping for another day two/early day three WR each of the last two drafts. Specifically wanted Franklin as he "slid" last year, and wanted Royals or Horton as they "fell" this year. No way to know if the general consensus will turn out to be right, or if the Bills will be vindicated by progress in the existing ranks. This season will likely clarify a few ongoing questions about how effectively the Bills build and coach their roster. -
Bills 6th Round Pick (#1) : Dorian Strong - CB - VA Tech
Richard Noggin replied to Simon's topic in The Stadium Wall
Oh the magnificent angst on display on day three of the NFL draft! Such drama! Such unheralded/amateur expertise! Such oversimplifications of rather incredibly complicated and interrelated outcomes! Such certainty! -
We now have the flexibility to play 4-3 and Big nickel
Richard Noggin replied to SoonerBillsFan's topic in The Stadium Wall
Some puzzlers in the OP imo: 1. Hoecht at MLB with Bernard freshly re-signed to play that same position? 2. 3rd round Rookie Jackson starting over a presumably healthy 30-year Joey Bosa on a one year prove-it deal? 3. Walker winning starting 1T? 4. The big nickel alignment includes only 4 DBs and 1 of the 3 LBs is Hoecht? That isn't just a standard 4-3 or really a 5-2 (as Hoecht will be classified as a DL)? -
Bills 5th Round Pick (#1) : Jordan Hancock - CB - The Ohio State
Richard Noggin replied to Simon's topic in The Stadium Wall
Agree until the number 15. Yes, he's being viewed as a S/NCB according to Beane, and yes he's larger and faster than Cam Lewis, and yes that's who will be competing with at least first. And yes he might want to (along with majority of draftees) add some strength/mass. But...adding 15 lbs of lean muscle for a speed/agility athlete is both difficult to do and especially difficult to do without a deleterious impact on speed/agility (especially change of direction). Maybe 5 lbs this year and see how that goes. He's not small as is.