Jump to content

Richard Noggin

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,772
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Richard Noggin

  1. See my Murray post above.
  2. ROLLING ball of butcher knives, to be exact
  3. Fascinating frenemies these last couple millennia
  4. I fancy this organic approach when I don't have an obvious favorite. But I can't see myself ever actively rooting for the Chiefs, unless it's some obscure playoff seeding scenario? Even then. Would need a cold shower after.
  5. Keep it simple: who do you hate more? Boom, Chiefs.
  6. Is that never happening already on likely run downs? Feels like teams are coming downhill with more frequency/aggression than they should against a Josh Allen offense, but I don't have numbers to support that sense. I CAN say with confidence that the Bills are NOT throwing it deep one way or the other. Whether that's due to Allen's decision making, Brady's play calling/passing concepts, or the way defenses are playing them...I can't say.
  7. Has to be Chiefs until proven otherwise. Difficult to disagree with posters saying Ravens, but it turns out the Bills have shown an ability to win those matchups when it matters. Cannot say the same thing about the Chiefs. Yet.
  8. Nope. 2 TDs with 2 PATs would have tied it up. Maths.
  9. So many reasons why the Lions are my NFC squad. The football reasons alone are sufficient tbh. The size and weight of Dan Campbell's and his team's collective "marbles" are also sufficient. They make it fun. Mucho cajones.
  10. Put the offense out and Goff can either punt or pass based on the read.
  11. I thought McDaniel's plan this week was solid tbh. Doubling down on it (running game emphasis and throwing it short/horizontally) later in the game was smart. Given the state of their OL (Mia was fielding their 3rd string RG. whom Walker absolutely clowned on that last interception) McDaniel probably should have stuck with the run more? Hard to say. They were having success attacking the sideline through the air. Throwing it up the seam with a midget QB maybe was the more specific mistake? I dunno. I think McDaniel is a very good offensive coordinator.
  12. I'd argue the back shoulder fade and the over the top fade are essentially the same route concept with a different target point. The lines have blurred a bit imho as time goes on, but yeah Rodgers has always thrown the best damned back shoulder sideline fade. Bar none.
  13. "centre" looks more like Francais to me, garcon
  14. SLOPPY STEAKS https://www.thesportsmemery.com/satire/fb7x46iysg3b9a63ak09dl1emv9ly4
  15. And completely pass over one Jameis Lanaed Crab Legs Winston?! That's crazy talk. We deserve newly released Jameis snaps and Jameis soundbytes, at least those of us who are pure of heart.
  16. Or for such a parabolic thrower, everything has the mathematical and emotional beauty and potential AND horror of gravity's rainbow. **not likely a beloved Bills MB reference, so apologies
  17. That's some Trent Edwards post-concussion energy.
  18. Wilson ain't it. I mean that's 100% UNACCEPTABLE.
  19. Historically, doesn't the SB loser usually usually have a frustrating, shite season the next year? Like more often than not? (Part of why Buff was so anomalous in the 90s and also why dynasties are SO impressive (and HATABLE!)).
  20. Meh I mean we'll always weeks one and two
  21. My clan celebrates Bourbon, specifically.
  22. I hope for exactly this end to the game, where starters are off the field almost entirely. BUT I don't think the McD PLAN will be to put the Saints away early and get his essential personnel out of harm's way. Seems more likely the PLAN will be to possess the ball, establish the run, and proceed with only as much offensive passing balance as needed. Controlling the game and keeping the football out of harm's way seem to be the offensive foci so far, except when absolutely forced to pass aggressively against Baltimore. WHAT IF THEY TOOK THAT APPROACH at times when it's less compulsory? Sprinkle in the up-tempo, spread-out, horizontally and vertically aggressive passing attack whenever it's favorable. Even if for just a couple plays against vulnerable defensive personnel, like almost any time when a defense has only 4 DBs on the field. Gotta be able to make LBs and Ss and CB2s pay, the way teams do to us often enough. Edit: I can't say for certain the Bills haven't tried this at all to date. But generally it sure does feel like they are keeping it VERY close to the vest and are 100% willing to sacrifice that inevitable snap when the defense finally adjusts to stop the running play the Bills had been calling with success for several snaps in a row. So rather than change it up a snap early and call the downfield shot play designed to counter the defense's inevitable adjustment, the Bills have been content to keep it horizontal and short to medium in depth of target more often than not.
×
×
  • Create New...