Buffarukus

for the shoot in the leg less lethal crowd take yourself out of your comfort zone and watch this. its very important. im not a fan of steven crowder comedy but he brings points that should not be ignored. if you would like start at 2:50 and ends at 4 if you dont want added commentary. its not easy to watch, i hope she survived. but it shows you the truth about the situations that you are talking about.

is she talking to the people who called them?

this is where i truley get angry. how the left just allows these race vultures to edit the story and even if they are caught red handed nothing happens to them. did they want that girl to get stabbed to death? if she was murdered the leftist would scream at him for not stopping her and want him held on charges for that as well. that racist just stood by while a young black woman was murdered! but that victims name would not be known. i hear alot of talk about big chain store destruction as violence is the language of the unheard. tell that to secoriea turners family, or david dorns, or Horace Lorenzo Anderson's to name a few. do they even know these names? black people are being killed in the area that has been turned into george floyds memorial near the street named after him! no outrage. no demands to end this type of violence. its just crime, deflect, whatabouts, ignore, from the very people who say no one cares about black life. https://kstp.com/news/shooting-kills-1-near-george-floyd-memorial/6033788/ so why do black lives only matter in a certain set of circumstances? why are people who perpetuate a false narratives allowed to try again and again giving story after story, edit after edit until the lies sticks and people are full of rage. hundreds apon hundreds of black lives are still being needlessly lost and the real racist intitution is the one that has trained the public to not care about them at all. leftists, you are holding that one up quite well.

i think its time to give places like Portland and Minneapolis exactly what they want. they win. abolish the police. completely. the police departments should go on strike and stop responding to all calls. the public believes in ACAB right? they are getting no support from their leadership. the DAs are cutting anyone loose regardless. the media is demonizing them. the public is not standing up for them and has voted this in to begin with. why are they half azzing it? we will defund ooh wait murder is skyrocketing come back so we can tell you we hate you...please. enough! let the activist defend the innocent. let social workers put their resumes in. let mobs take over chops and chazes with no worries of issues from police "invading" to solve the crimes that take place like in the past, and present. let them explain to the families of the innocent victims they ignore its only crime or put their lives on the line daily if they wish to help them. lets see them stand up to power when that power becomes the cities gang violence. if a business gets destroyed leave it. its only property is what i hear, so it shouldn't be missed by the community it serves. free things for everyone until there are no more things. hopefully none are put in a situation they die but if they have to defend themselves they can deal with the hindsight mob rule of what they should have done in split second situations. who knows, maybe it will be a testament to the rest of the country and positive changes will be made in this utopia free from racists institutions and capitalist. maybe it will be war torn chaos. i think its time to find out. why are we arguing and fighting so hard to stop people from what they want. all we ask is that you stay there, don't bail on your ideas or community you fought so hard for if it does not turn out how you envisioned. show us all what it was you were trying to tell us whether it ends good or bad. either way, it will be a important lesson for the country.

now they are over only 75% instead of 175% capacity .....progress

well whatever you think i answered your question so i think its fair if you answer one of mine. can you name a single thing that biden has done since he has taken power that you disagree with without resorting to a trump reference?

no. at least i hope not. i was not a trump fan but i also did not fall for the narrative he was given. we will pick this up later. you still referenced trump but i think we are on to something. ill reply again later. have a good night.

im not convincing anyone of anything. im talking to you directly. and yet again a trump reference.

as stated in my first response. every reply so far contains a trump reference. every one. at some point your going have to look at the present. look at what's going on today. i could research all the "kitchen sink" facts and links but i think we both know you don't care. its alot of work only to get a trump meme as a response. like i said. people are coming around and seeing what's going on. if you ever become one of them maybe we can have a actual discussion.

there is so much hindsight to go my friend kids in cages turned into: kids in cages. sleeping under bridges being sexually assualted crammed side by side in covid camps forcing biden to....build the wall defund the police has ended up in anarchy killing innocent people, most are disadvantaged minorities. liberal governments that are in no better position covid wise have been found to murder their most vulnerable. crippled their economies making them come up with new ways to tax their people. again hurting poor people. good thing poppa biden floated them a loan or it would be far worse. still coming as they have made no changes to their budgets. instead of the "attacking journalism" we now get " ignoring journalism" i could go on. that's the thing about false narratives. you can't hold up the lie forever. too much data being accumulated. people are waking up. its ok to join them. step onto this side. all is forgiven. i have so much more to show you.

you referenced him again!? what did you think the funniest line was in the video? mine was. "the same people who laughed at trump for suggesting digesting bleach are the ones who used cleaners to wash their fruit for over a year" 🤣😃😄 common thats funny! thats not you is it? what percentage bleach do you use? 50/50? be careful out there.

there you go 5 word sentance that still referenced trump. keep up the good work, they will need it.

better get your memes and emojis ready. the information on how well he has done in the pandemic compared to the democrats is getting to the point even devout liberals see it. 😂🤣😅 the narrative is falling apart. they are going to need your "whatabout trumps" like never before lol

people seem to not understand its not particularly about the actions that are taken. its the unbalanced actions.

sorry you may have caught me in a edit. what was the context for that quote you want a link for. speaking of which. edit: so i see what i wrote. you want a link to what is expected of websites when it comes to its operation as a platform? heres the first article i found. https://www.city-journal.org/html/platform-or-publisher-15888.html offensive is a pretty loose term. if you think a company should ban people for this then its free reign to do as they please. that can defined as anything really. as for the rest read my previous response. more input and conversations are a good thing even if we don't agree.

i am mad they are a monopoly which is why I'm speaking out about it. ill try to leave that part out. you seem to be overlooking my point. terms of service are made as a agreement to the users. you saying the largest platforms in the world can arbitrarily pick and choose what people can or cannot speak about even when they are ABIDING to that agreement is not a good stance to take imo. not only this but you also think its ok to administer the rules everyone agrees to unfairly? when the buisness is information that is incredably dangerous stance. your giving companies that have special protections by the government zero standards or ethics to abide by and seem to be offering corporations complete autonomy. under your line of thinking you are perfectly fine with companies discriminating for any reason really, as long as it is not strictly covered by the law. so if a black man walks into a restaurant that has agreed sneakers are ok. a owner can kick him out because he doesnt allow "nike" sneekers. the black guy says hey there are five guys wearing nikes right there. sorry as a buisness i can do want. id like you to know you are not being kicked out for your race..its our new nike policy i decided on. whats that? you are talking about abortion at a table. please leave your no longer welcome here. shall i go on? these are pretty extreme examples but so is blocking a story by a established publication to prevent the information from reaching the public during a democratic election. so is making death threats to children for being "racist" by standing in front of a indian. so is allowing advertising for get togethers that repeatedly result in courthouses being attacked and attempting to burn people alive in the building. so is comparing people you simply disagree with the worst murdous scumbags from germany. all things twitter allow that goes against there very own tos and leads to actual broken laws. but...free market.

if you think twitter has clear cut terms of service, are transparent in applying them then you are only looking at the surface. if you have a few hours to kill watch this episode with Twitter CEO jack dorsey. its long but very informative. also note it was years ago. nothing has changed, only intensified. watch it or just believe me lol. its right out of the horses mouth which is why i find it credible party affiliation is a protected group. its called freedom of speech and its a foundation of this country. there are no terms of service that state if you are conservative we can delete you even though many seem to want to go down that path and have no issue when it happens. lastly you are missing the point i made. if i want a cake and there is one giant cake store that denies me that also has power to prevent me to get cake elsewhere while also lobbying my credit card to cancel me if i order one while also hiding info on any competition that WOULD be willing to make a cake. i think its a problem. i dont think you understand how much power these tech companies have and how they are using it as a collective.

well whatever monopoly laws should be enforced and these guys should be broken up first of all. second they dont have any clear terms of service or are not transparent in how they are applied. it seems to be at will. when you deal in the assumption you are a platform then you are just the host. anything not illegal is protected. if you are a publisher you can pick and choose what you want...like they are doing but also responsable for whats published. they get both. claim platform but act like a publisher. its pretty sick its been allowed to get this far especially when the parler takedown was found to be false. people still dont care 🤷‍♂️

because those private companies are juggernauts and everyone knows it i see the baker example used. if bakers owned multi billion/trillion dollar companies and used there power and influence IN TADEM to crush or absorb up and coming bakers with a clear agenda to stop anyone from baking a gay cake. with the bonus of having special governmental provisions no one else has. then we can compare the two. way to many monopolies in this country. our leadership keeps conviently forgetting capitalism's history and why anti monopoly laws exist. too big to fail is the new excuse to rape the treasury and american worker.

right wasn't pointing at you directly man. it seemed like there was a dog pile for the narrative that i was speaking about. intertwine all that with peoples need to rush to judgment the moment a story is out and having to much ego to rethink there original ideas as being wrong when more facts emerge. its a powder keg. its not looking good for the critical thinkers.

you also cannot just look at one set of datapoints and say case closed. not saying you personally. i dont know. but many are. disparity. a higher percentage of blacks are killed by police. case closed. racism. but when the same percentages are used to show a certain race is at a higher percentage to commit violent crimes, the disparity is given a excuse. even though that leads directly to a higher percentage of interactions between the two groups in the first place. so blacks are at a higher percentage of being killed by cops but also at a higher percentage of killing cops themselves https://ucr.fbi.gov/leoka/2019/tables/table-42.xls this is a important point! as it leads to both sides interacting with each other knowing it can be a more dangerous encounter because statistically it is. bias unconcious whatever the factor when your life is on the line it will not be ignored.saying stop thinking that way to only one side is not a solution. my issue is the second half of the story and percentage ive shown is VERY hard to find and labeled racist if you do! the media is saturating the public with the first half only and burying the second so people don't even concider it or even worse know very well but excuse it. there isn't any honesty about the facts or anger towards the manipulation we all are being overloaded with noone cares about honesty. that's not how problems get fixed and unfortunatly society seem to be on a unstoppable path in the wrong direction. has anyone in here actually sat down and watched videos of police doing everyday stops being very professional and in a split second getting gunned down? same families left without loved ones as any other, regardless of race. thats part of this story as well!!

ok fair enough just curious how many black groups have you been in? have you ever been a minority? i grew up on the eastside and can assure you racism is in every group. it teaches you to judge others as individuals. so then youll talk about power structure and police having it. yet SEVERAL of the incidents have black police chiefs and captains..i guess they are all for white supremacy as they instruct people where to go and what crime to fight. not to mention they attained this position to begin with. but they were fired...progress. we are going in the weeds. sorry the hockey team you play with is racist and im also sorry you believe a narrative that is highly exaggerated. i could go further but we are 4 years removed from a black man holding the highest office in this country, twice, and 0 from the second (woman). black people cannot achieve there goals and not be arrested do to racism, seems to be the overarching argument. many of my black friends and family must be outliers then. that's my experience at least. as for the cops doing the same to whites. yes im against police brutality in general...who isnt? asians lives matter, black lives, trans lives matter ,we are going towards all lives..just give it time.

this isnt about police. its about psychology. because you dont see, hear about police interactions with whites you think it doesn't exist. because you constantly see "white man attacks", even in the headline without even reading you gain a perception. like i said statistics facts show otherwise. there are plenty of daniel shavers prob out there. yet not many given the same if any coverage...hmmmm

so race being used in headlines only when the perpetrators white isnt mental conditioning? go ahead google search "black man attacks" see what pops up for headlines. it must think i meant attacked? honest mistake as that headline is hard to find, if you can. now "white man attacks" gee now google knows perfectly well what i mean. look at those headlines. your being gaslit. facts and statistics are there to discount all this headline bs and simple proof they are skewing everyone perception. this isn't just one channel man.

that could be the case for many but you cant just write off the factors i stated. there are historic, never seen before numbers of illegal aliens pouring into this country and democrats dont seem to mind..period. certain states say yes please come we will protect you..promoting it further. regardless of trump i promise regular people want secure elections due to this..it has zero to do with trump or software. im glad your rational enough to not fall for the full on board propaganda "on steriods and such". but both sides have their zealots and that will never change. if you have a problem with the drop boxes #'s. thats perfectly fine. i heard you can vote absentee no questions asked. thats basically a solution to any dropbox issue but it requires standards to be secure. if you, the democrats or anyone in community think the standards are restrictive or too high there is NOTHING stopping anyone from having campaign drives, fundraisers or outreach programs to help those achieve the standards such as IDs. instead there are threats, corporate interventions and inflated toxic accusations. this is from the self proclaimed, great uniter. you can litterally start right now. why is the solution always lower expectations and lower standards. instead of lets raise up communities to achieve them. dont have a id lets get you one and now you can also use it from other things your "restricted" from. this would be different if the hurdles were completely unreasonable asks. you can't look at the bill honestly and say that's true. without any bias involved i want secure elections..and could care less if trump anywhere near them. i want a standard that cannot be argued over and litigated EVERY 4 years...and yes the democrats routinely declare voter fraud as well. 2016 russia anyone? so in order for this to end there has to be COMPROMISE. maybe the republicans need to sit back at the table to fine tune things, but that was not in any democrat response. just a overblown overreaction which is all we can ever expect from american politics and the loudest folks on any website.