Buffarukus

you keep moving the goalposts. you wanted evidence of democrat manipulation. i gave it. you said my source was bad for voter software issues i gave you another source for a entirely different story. i made my stance very clear. i think if its not clear proof for widespread or election changing then it will be discounted as nothing significant as it has been thus far. i even stated how recounts DID find something as well.. VOTES! some places "found" thousands! some hundreds. a problem existed that otherwise would not have counted those voices. hopefully it is being looked at and rectified as well as the other issues i raised. if you believe the election was flawless and democrats are well intentioned group of leaders that will implement positive voting changes for all americans by strengthening voter integrity then im glad you have that level of optimism. i see some very dangerous thinking on it. opening boarders mixed with no voter identification nessasary for instance has been on a bill I've seen. the breath act contained those things clear as dau on the website until it was removed recently. of coarse im a bigot for my opposition to that ideology by some. the fact they eliminated the green candidate shows they care nothing about disenfranchising people, integrity and I'm just learning about this HR1 that looks to have loads of corruption, especially against 3rd parties. as for the russian propaganda thing i accused you of believing. that was a tounge in cheek remark hoping you would draw similarities to 4 years ago. when a huge amount of people and elected officials demanded that our election was infiltrated by outside enemies of the website you said i shouldn't use, seeing the comparison? ahhh maybe poorly executed, anyways, large amounts of calls to reform our susceptible voting machines and their software as well as our system in general. so it is never infiltrated again. i supported those reforms, without a lick of evidence provided. i produced alot more proof in this thread then they ever did. but it did not matter either way, why would I fight against demands to secure our electoral process and continue to make half the country feel disenfrachised? not alot of upside to that stance...either🤔 i read your edit on your first reply. no man. no hard feelings. hopefully none your way either. just internet jabber.

several sites to choose from that reported that so i could choose another site if you like. if its false claims against the software that's fine with me. I'm providing evidence to the contrary that these machines were perfectly safe with no issues. that statement was made by a independent..non Russian investigation team. sorry it was presented on RT. im not seeing anything on this from the mainstream but there are other sites that have the exact same story if it makes you more comfortable. strange how your not a democrat but you seem to be pushing the russian collusion propagada that the last "election fraud" debate was propagated from....... and lasted in the media for 3 years! a impeachment trial, and is now universally understood to be baseless. i guess ill go back and get the other research i found just to show this isn't a singular story based on russian propaganda. https://leohohmann.com/2020/11/13/software-engineers-report-dominion-flipped-minimum-of-138000-votes-from-trump-to-biden-in-michigan/ anyways back to the topic. your original claim was the election was absolutely not stolen and people need to stop saying it was. in which i basically said democrats have had issues in their own election and are telling others they must agree on absolutes? do you absolutely know if Bernie gets a fair shot he loses to hillary and trump never becomes president? they should be screaming about their own issues before they tell others they are insane. the democrats are fighting to make some of those concerns permanent laws now. yes i know your not a democrat..i was! so i think its important. i am also an american who wants to not ever have this happen to our country again. you then wanted evidence on the democrats and i provided it. i wrote a very long post that should be at the very least be eye opening for those on that side who are hypocritically condemning.. showing striking similarities. after i provide it your stance is so I'm not sure why you wanted evidence in the first place. yes i know candidates sling mud at each other. i also know when the establishment aligns all of its power against a candidate that is corrupt and wrong. i stated "why even run candidates you will destroy if they get to far?" you seem to absolve these things because you don't care and selections were done in secret in smokey rooms in the past. thats fine and basically confirms my original statement minus putting you in the democrat side. for those that are interested in selecting the person who represents their party its important that they receive a fair unbiased chance. its the only way we see someone not in line with the establishment ever actually obtain power. that's pretty important to me no matter which party wins but according to some, only the general election is important so we can choose which establishment backed candidate we think is less evil from now on. not a good outlook for the future with this ideology. when it comes to fools declaring election fraud. somehow ive been put in the strange position of defending trumps allegations and having to scour the internet for factual proof that he himself has not. that's not what I'm saying and never was my stance. my stance is that there is validity to peoples idea that we have alot of troubling problems in our election system and yes i believe corruption was involved. the overwhelming evidence seems to say that joe biden was elected as presidents but that in no way means that there were not very troubling ways in which that happened. that also does not mean if they were corrected he would not have been. this isn't as simple as the answer is 4 and everyone else who does not agree is flat out wrong. if your independent as you claim to be then you see the issues i brought up. only a partisan would fight against measures that degrade the confidence all americans should have in our elections, primary and all. trump may have lost and you may be right that covid forced changes. odd that Fauci and the cdc said voting in person was perfectly safe. odd that the mail in ballots were made in the way they seem hard to retrace after discarded. now that vaccines are going to be out will those laws that were changed last minute, you say justifiably, be changed back? hmmm so ill restate some of my issues. and yes i fully support you grabbing your bootstraps, get a job and buy some water not on the taxpayers dime if you want to vote in a line!!! georgians! always with the water gimme gimme gimme 🙄 just kidding. of coarse i support that measure.

how a nominating process of a party is up to them? what exactly is the point of having primaries if the will of the american voter becomes subverted by what a party feels is best for them. Bernie was winning many delegates up until Iowa! why even have Bernie or any of the others "not approved" waste money, time and resources, only to do everything within their power to not get them the nomination regardless. if that isn't concidered blatant corruption on the highest level then your pretty much agreeing with me that democrats don't care about election integrity. they are perfectly fine with the establishment making the choice for them as long as they produce the facade they had any say in the process. perfectly happy to tow the anyone but trump line after the decision was made on their behalf...TWICE! you say both do it, which is true on a level but i can promise you if the RNC were as corrupt, donald trump would have never become the presidential nominee. established republicans were not in support of a outsider stepping in. the people voted and that's where the chips fell. its how democracy is supposed to work, like it or not. so this was the basis of my argument. the democrats are not calling for in depth transparent investigations into their own elections and think the other half of the country should share their low standards, shut up and sit down. i gave plenty of reasons why, true or not, rational people would believe their were problems with this general election as the same issues happened in the democratic primary. you seem to suggest well if there were problems then they would be presented on a right wing platforms. im pretty sure they have been, continuously. i gave two examples of problems. one that led to a arrest. the other that was immediately censored instead of what should be the standard debated. then you say that they are not presenting it and is not censored? i tryed my best not to include right wing sites as my links, it is not easy but does it make it less true? i wish there was less biased media but it simply one or the other for MOST well known publications..period. i haven't conducted full research of the general election but you go rather in depth on voting machine software basically saying it is proven there were no issues. a quick search reveals. https://www.rt.com/usa/509674-michigan-dominion-audit-errors-fraud/ "We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results." you talk about recounts and everyone laughed as alot of them revealed biden actually gained more votes in areas. noone really stopped to think how most recounts FOUND hundreds and in some cases thousands of uncounted votes. all voices that would never have been counted. but every vote counts and if its not enough to change the outcome..no issues here? there seems to be a overarching theme of "widespread" and "changed results". there are alot of issues found that dont fall under that very exclusive umbrella and can be dismissed as untrue! [ fact check : FALSE! ] this issue def would NOT have changed the election! no one asked that question in the first place. 🙄 you talk about the court hearings thrown out. i agree for the most part. but when laws are changed by those in power the last minute its pretty easy to not break it. not saying that is the case, mostly cause i dont want to research it all, but the last minute state changes are just another reason that draws suspicion regardless. broken pipes that stopped voting that evidence showed never existed. ballot watchers being told as long as they were in the same building then that constitutes the process was "overseen" regardless if they were near the actual ballot processing, due to covid of coarse. being able to actually observe at a reasonable distance had to be fought in court! the list goes on and on. we can go back and forth but i think it boils down to this. when you have a huge population that has lost confidence in the electoral process you cannot just say..get over it. you cannot just say corruption did or did not happen as a absolute. I've provided alot of aligations that produces suspicion and im not sure why anyone would disagree regardless if true, its suspicious. in many cases these are not some off the wall way out there conspiracy theory type accusations. the things i shown are just the tip of other accusations. crazy idea but how about a full and transparent investigation of the election by a completely independant body? when it comes to postal, or insurrection our gov loves to deep dive into issues, somtimes repeatedly. not so much here. how about the democrats address why voter ID is so difficult to obtain for democratic voters, even though its not, and address THAT, instead of eliminating it from elections..which invites SUSPICION. people are fighting AGAINST HAVING A ID!!? i think we know the real reason why! address signature verification issues conservatives have. why are they trying to pass unsolicited voter enrollment...which is SUSPICIOUS. why are they trying to allow people to collect ballots on others behalf regardless of reason...which will make the system open to more voter harvesting! instead of eliminating things that provide more election integrity they seem intent on endorsing the things that produce fraud allegations. like i said the democrats have a very low bar and the supporters will not like the outcome of one party rule if they don't demand better. historically one party rule is where things become very scary.

i wasnt calling you a democrat, but those are mostly the people who vehemently deny the accusations. as i said, as their elections have had repeatedly been manipulated in different ways. if your looking for flat out fraud or undeniable proof. sorry i am not a lawyer and lack concrete evidence in that regard. ibut manipulation towards targets is numerous and your asking the dems to investigate themselves. good luck in that regard. if you want to go piece by piece you can start at the information in the wikileak drop showing the corruption the DNC was working against Bernie Sanders for Hillary Clinton. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/23/us/politics/dnc-emails-sanders-clinton.html then we can talk about the iowa caucas and the "technical issues" with "shadow inc". https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/shadow-vendor-iowa-dems-reporting-app/story?id=68754002 guess who contributed a large sum of money? just the guy who declared a early victory. pete butiigeig. https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/04/politics/pete-buttigieg-iowa-caucus/index.html how about the treatment of andrew yang. how he was not allowed to debate do to dnc "rules" yet bloomberg could enter stage left at his choosing. how the media repeatedly would not even include his name in the standings? https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/undaunted-missing-tuesdays-debate-andrew-yangs-absence-creates/story?id=68257838 how about the targeted slander campaign started in unison by the DNC and media against tulsi gabbard on her being a russian asset, conviently after she dismantled kamala harris on the debate stage? the threat became real and they cant have that past brought up when your plan is to run on the identity politics. heres a dnc lackey trying to propagate the lie and the way "news" should react. its why i like the youtube show (rising). subscribe to it and help keep true journalism alive. plenty of parrots on video that simply amplified that message if you take a search. but the media is not under any directives. and just as tulsi is gaining steam "also conviently" google has a glitch on her donation page as her name search skyrocketed. but the tech monopolies aren't in bed with the democrat establishment. all this censorship and coordinated elimination of conservatives and any talk of election fraud is just a interesting conspiracy. looks like they were priming the pump to me. https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/25/8930373/google-tulsi-gabbard-democratic-candidate-lawsuit-ad-search-ban-political-bias-debates is that enough? are you willing to look past these similarities to what alot of people are saying about the presidential campaigns? from russian asset, to suspicious voting software, to organized media slander, to tech censorship? so again, its very odd that people regard the same accusations towards the presidential election with such certainty. when you talk about actual voter fraud its pretty hard to make a argument when any and every bit of evidence given is censored or is written off as right wing propaganda. project veritas showed voter harvesting...that was written off as propaganda then later the women featured was arrested. im sure it was the only incident in the country. thank god we got the lone wolf. https://www.houstonchronicle.com/politics/texas/amp/TX-woman-arrested-election-fraud-project-veritas-15867537.php steven crowder recently showed locations in nevada that were used as voter residents, they were empty lots with a newspaper and live feed...then his twitter was immediatly deleted for disinformation. both are concidered right wing cooks. yes they are biased but ill also remind you crowder had a rally questioning michigan gov whitmer on lying about nursing home murd..uhh deaths. loooong before anyone in the media was concerned and similar governors were getting emmy's how about the democrats removing the green party candidate off the ticket...every vote counts, except for theirs. is it ok if they declare fraud? https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/09/18/penn-s18.html so. its really hard to show evidence when it is immediatly deleted, people are punished. Im not saying the election was stolen. i don't know either way, but I'm not going to say for certain it was not when i cant even hear the evidence and a open free conversation. whhew. this research paper brought me back to my college days.

just curious if you feel the democratic primaries for the last two major elections were on the up and up even though there is clear evidence to the contrary? funny how democrats defend elections with such certainty when their own elections had massive amounts of manipulation. they dont seem to mind at all, so i guess no one else should.

if you want a neutral prospective on what is going on in my opinion listen to this. i think it sums it up well. im a old school democrat. the party has done a complete 180. i cant blame younger democrats as they really dont know any better. but if anyone is like me and felt they represented you in the past and you still support them now. to me you never had principles. you were given them. i have to sit here and defend the right wing because they are all that is left of the resistance. each side will always bicker over garbage that's thrown into the mixer. its why it always ramps up during election time. keep looking at the red beam and pay no attention to who has their hands on the levers. bombs keep getting dropped and the working class keep getting siphoned...regardless of who is presented as the face of the party in power.

thank you for your question senator. i can absolutley affirm that i will not allow the government to supersede a parents decision and will also absolutely require adult parental consent and full consultations. it is important to fully discuss all options and negative lifelong effects before ever begining any treatments toward gender reassignment, hormone or puberty blocker procedures for minors. if she already believes this then it should be easy to say out loud while in a confirmation hearing. seems pretty reasonable and easy to me. not sure where a argument could be started.

you son of a parent. lol. you made me download the pdf and try to comprehend that garbage. 43 pages!! i see fact check that says it was for that single piece of legislation then i also see Under the changes, words like “father,” “mother,” “son,” “daughter,” “brother” and “sister” will be replaced in official documents by the gender-neutral terms “parent,” “child” or “sibling,” respectively. so what is a "official documents"..plural? im not sure but it would lead me to believe that this can easily be seen as a beginning step. i never thought that they were banning gendered language from speeches. if a republican said father i wasn't implying that they would halt the proceedings and arrest someone from speaking. but did think it was required for all bills and rules as i would think that would be concidered having to be written up on "official documents". either way it looks to be a virtue signaling tactic that does not encompass as much as i thought. ill admit i may have not gotten the full facts on it and have been enlightened. ill def look more into it more now. what i will say, when it comes to this. its a drop in the bucket. so then you have this interaction between rand paul and rachel levine. i think that deserves a direct answer. but maybe thats me. just another drop in the bucket. then you have attempted censorship by the ACLU of a book on the study of the damage to transgendered teens who have made irreparable decisions. WHY would this be on a censor list? why would someone have to fight a organization that used to fight for freedom of speech? just to hide that there ARE negative consequences to these decisions. it isnt all sunshine for some people and the decision should be taken VERY seriously. another drop. https://www.iwf.org/2020/11/16/some-in-aclu-have-new-cause-book-banning/ so then we look at the amount of childrens books, shows, influences, forced educations, even against their parents wishes. (some examples shown in this thread). the fight against established science of two sexes. the rise of "violence" if you use the wrong pronoun and banning off platforms for even discussing the other side. the women right advocates being attacked for wanting their own sports, scholarships ect. ect. its almost if there werent gay pride parades all over the country. gay bars and night clubs. gay actors and performers who have been very successful. gay right to marry. shows specifically designated towards this lifestyle, some of which was established decades before any of this. but the lgbt community has a subsector of trans so we MUST focus all our attention on that now. if you don't, or question it publically, then you are a bigot. and you wonder why this subject envokes a emotional response? why people are swayed by another announcement of a drip going into the , you must conform to this thinking or else, bucket?

i always try to conversate with those that will do back with thoughtful discussion. the internet has more then enough name calling spats that go nowhere. i was not calling you personally a supremist. i was just pointing out how the cancel mob has no issue superseding the voices of who is being effected the most. as with most things today it turns into a all or nothing referendum as i am a white supremist for not agreeing and trying to maintain a racist trope. at the end of the day i think we should ask those mostly effected and stop allowing others to step in and make those demands. it brings obserdity to the conversation. it also become profitable as those calling for the attention have stories to produce for clicks and gofundme to link for support. manufactured outrage. we can look at a potato toy and agree (id hope) removing a gender is inconsequential to anything as they even still have genders in the actual product, just not brand name. but when you combine that with the fact a major body of government has banned all gendered language you (id hope) say hey that's crazy and may be going to far in society. when it comes to historical writing (id hope) that all can not be viewed under the same glass. some writing requires the historical ugly past context, some doesn't. will you fight on behalf of the ones that do? instead of snap decisions from a mob that clearly has no basis in reality for some of what they call for.. this needs actual debate. unfortunatly anyone making these arguments is given a label regardless of the content of the discussion. so the right will fight EVERYTHING because it IS leading to some impactful negative changes. such as abolishing police area violence spikes, 3 year old given options to gender change. THREE!? ect ect there's a middle ground and we may disagree but as long as there are people willing to make a honest dialogue then hopefully neither extreme will fully win, but lets be real, the left is in the drivers seat. if leftist dont speak up on these things then its not going to end well. imo. so i am. the fact you don't simply throw trump argument at me and stick around to defend your point truley does give me hope. believe me when i tell you ive taken your points into consideration on my stance.

i wasnt generally talking about you. just giving the question to those who feel that way. is it a racist trope if the people that are closely associated with it do not see it that way. the fact noone seems to take their opinion as the end of the discussion seems pretty supremist to me. so the question really is how far does it go? when is it (lol) they mad at a potato toy and oh my god that is wrong and should be stopped? it doesn't seem like the left is concerned about drawing a line and will attack everything with impunity. case instance the set design at cpac..racism!! designed by a liberal owned company whos done tons of sets designs for biden in the past and meant nothing they say was intended...opps. but are targeted just the same. on to the next one. you went back in time and showed a racist advertisement as justification but removing her also removes that history. noone will ever see her face and look back at her life, the companies history, and how her image persevered through that time to a point where society now simply saw her as a well known brand identifier. a smiling face to greet you for your pancakes. you are the ones seeing the racism then calling others that name..for not seeing the same thing?

so when you bought pancake mix you saw this black face on the brand and thought about slavery and minstrel shows and it offended you? so now that you see pearl milling company as a logo your more at ease at the breakfast table? even though i put a story that said her descendants and community felt her dipiction was a homage to her. your thoughts on the subject override the people most closely associated to it?

we live in a world where a famous black person was removed off of packaging of rice by the demand of mostly white people. the company removed a black face from their product...so they can sell more rice. and not be racist. read that again. now lets talk about pancakes and syrup. do you know who nancy green is? don't worry. that person will no longer spark curiosity about black history and culture. https://abcnews.go.com/US/untold-story-real-aunt-jemima-fight-preserve-legacy/story?id=72293603 I was, I was taken aback. I was really shocked. I knew people didn't realize that those were real people and, you know, to phase them out, would kind of erase their history,” Harris said No time ever have I heard anyone in my community say that this image was one that was derogatory. So I don't know where that sentiment is coming from," she said. just a few examples of how the racists are winning. keep up the good fight sjws!

there is also a major news paper that picked it up. https://nypost.com/2021/02/24/buffalo-students-told-all-white-people-play-a-part-in-systemic-racism/

[district analysis of the program found that more than 70 percent of students enrolled in the program were white and Asian, even though nearly 80 percent of all Boston public school students are Hispanic and Black. Last fall, 453 students received invitations, 143 students applied and 116 enrolled this year, officials said.] so 310 students did not even apply and 27 who did, did not make it in. unless all 27 were black and hispanic the real issue might be why aren't black/hispanic kids applying!? could a contributing factor be kids not thinking they have a shot because they get told their skin color will be a factor that holds them back in their lives? it doesn't even say what % of black hispanics are eliminated that attempted to attend yet has leaders, who should be well aware of specific stats when it comes to enrollment, getting "disturbed". I'm disturbed these people need a pandemic to notice things like this and year long "studies" to figure them out for the first time.

yeah, when you call out the radicals they usually come out and try to derail the topic. i try not to give the desired attention as its usually a waste of time. not like i can have a reasonable discussion or change the mind of somone who includes "filthy bigot" as a predisposition. i can imagine he fine tooth combed my post again, saw nothing more to latch onto after he cherry picked topics of his choice, and will not reply again. i went to buffalo public schools. if this is true its somewhat personal. i guess that's why im more inclined to engage with posters i normally wouldn't on this one.

did i give any assumptions i agree with banning the morning after pill? i specifically said theres a middle ground. there are people advocating late term abortions under right to choose!! the hell are you reading. that second paragraph shows your a zealot who pushes everyone into a box but talks about demonizing. i clearly stated these are RADICAL positions. but proving my point for me is a good thing.

i didn't think it was that bad. lol i agree with most of what you say but your ideas are coming from a adult who has lived experiences not the children its aimed at. im all for inclusionary lessons about anti racism and anti bullying but there just seems to always be a extremist viewpoint that is getting injected into the things most people agree with. the normal citizens do not seem to identify it and fight against it. anti racism seems to have to include demonizing a race and ironically promoting segregation. it does not need those things to be successful at creating a better society trans rights seems to have to include removing scientific understanding of 2 genders and terms like mother, father ect ect womens right to choose now means terminating a fully formed human with pain receptors up and until it is birthed. when did the debate about life shift to that extreme? i find that as crazy as stopping all rights to choose and sending women back to horrific stories of back alley doctors. there's a middle ground being against illegal immigration somehow equates to racism. but immigration reform is most likely neccessary if it has become overtly difficult. being proud of america and its values suddenly became holding up a white supremist patriarchy? if all these extremes would be denounced i think we would be on a better path to at least be able to compromise but sadly i think its turned into all or nothing proposition from both sides. your either fully on board or not at all. we as citizens have to fig out how to tell our leaders we want to compromise...but im not sure that is even true anymore. 😔

i presented a 3 hour documentary on the topic from professors that were in a school where this was taught. they are giving their own personal accounts. it doesnt get much more in depth then that. this may be a extreme circumstance...but it did happen by eveyone "screaming and moaning" do you mean this forum..that you made the fourth reply to? or twitter which is nothing but those things mentioned. im not seeing allot of screaming here. just giving their opinions on the topic for the most part...out of the 6 replies. if you want the story as in a news format here you go. https://www.city-journal.org/buffalo-public-schools-critical-race-theory-curriculum other then that i guess we will see how long it takes for a full unbiased, in depth story on a specific school district takes before people are able to discuss it.

critical race theory was brought into schools a long time ago. it made the news for alittle while but many may have missed it. i encourage everyone to take some time out of your day and watch this documentary on it. its free. costs you nothing and is told by a teacher that, remember, worked in the most libral culturally sensitive place in our country. i have no children and if you do, you owe it to yourself to see the other side of what this has the ability to do. you may notice some similarities with recent events. part 1 part 2 part 3

you have to include whats happened during the pandemic. governments have historically used time of crisis/fear to whittle away at freedom and cease more control. its at this time people have to stay hyper vigilant. im not talking strictly democrats...for instance, see the patriot act and listen to what snowden says it entails i agree with you that small buisness needs help but unfortunately its too little to late for many. the fact so many were arbitrarily closed with no guidelines to stay open is a direct power grab. like i said the basic human right to earn a living taken away and for many, its not coming back. the hypocracy of allowing big box stores to remain open while funneling all revenue in their direction when there was no evidence it slowed any spread. there was info later on where places like barber shops showed miniscule spread. this was how small buisness and middle class were targeted for no legitimate reason. hindsight is not making that reasoning, as many were protesting these truths a very long time ago. as for religion. many were closed. jewish temples were overtly targeted with padlocks in NYC. yet thousands protested in much larger groups. both are under rights to peacefully assemble correct? there is also the division of church and state that was trampled. not sure how the two are any different. luckly the supreme court stepped in...it the only reason both ruling are being laxed, under direct court order. unfortunatly you don't seem to understand how deep censorship has gotten. i dont think i can tell you just how many people have been "cancelled" and lost thier livelihoods for simply speaking their own mind on a topic that does not fit the narrative. not spewing conspiracies, not attacking anyone yet those that have made direct death threats are perfectly fine. promient people who called for the killing of children (covington). antifa who can and STILL organize to this day on platforms. this isn't about terms of service or consequences for wrong actions. its not even close to equal. this is about steering society into the condemnation of those who don't agree. say its a private company and go elsewhere and when you do.. they attack it with ( a place where HATE SPEECH is allowed to thrive ). label anything hate speech and its easy to shut things down. wallstreet bets were labeled all those thing...even russians! to try and get them to stop forcing hedgefunds to pay on their shortselling, eventually they just unlawfully stopped the ability to buy the stock. that's not the america i knew and it definitely is not a example of having "the same rights no more or less"

are you a small buisness owner? i think they have the right to provide for their families and not be arbitrarily shut down under threats fines and padlocks. no scientific evidence, complying with cdc guidelines and hypocritical big box stores open right next door...as a start losing everything you built up over your lifetime and no way to put food on the table might have people worked up are you religious? did you want to peacefully assemble to practice your faith last year? even though it is in the constitution and other groupings were allowed to group as they pleased? do you think you have a right to protect yourself and your belongings from others without prosecution? how many were denied that right last year? can you enjoy freedom of speech? do you think that extends to others who don't have your political or social ideaology? do you think all those that lost their livelihoods because a mob decided they "deserved" it? would you like to read a book on the negative effects transgenderism is having on teenagers? the ACLU (they used to stand up for free speach) tryed and was successful at blocking its sale for a time. would you like to talk about or obtain information on covid medically and origins that is not confirmed with the mainstream, how about elections? see how far the convo goes before its censored. would you like to buy stock in a company called gamestop? it was perfectly legal..nope. shut down. but only if your hurting the hedgefund gov financiers. would you like to use a buisness service alternative to twitter. a legitamate competitor that broke no laws but was still shut down by major tech monopolies under lies that it promoted extremism..while facebook where the groups really formed was unmentioned and untouched. soon we will be talking about gun rights..thats coming. im glad you still have all your freedoms and rights but look outside yourself to see whats happening. these were just a few things i guess we took for granted 5 10 years ago. should i go on?

this one im alittle torn over. there is no way the min wage comes close to allowing someone the ability to care for oneself let alone anyone else. i think a jump that high is definatly destructive to small buisness, brings all other wages down and will quickly be nullified by inflation. so anyone cheering this on. youll be talking about low wages but also higher unemployment very shortly. but i also see how companies are using the gov to sublimate their workforce on the taxpayers backs. welfare, food stamps, heap ect ect. there's a unspoken agreement where workers and companies are taking advantage of social services so incentive by both sides to not offer "full" time or simply not enter the workforce is pretty high regardless. so whats a good solution? alot of bootstrapers say get a skill to not work min wage. most of those people have good jobs and many i talk to are from the older generation. a good paying factory job with benefits, pension was waiting with your hs diploma. those are pretty rare today. now higher education isnt the answer unless youd like a house payment..to get a job. so whats left? picking a trade school, join the military or be connected enough to be given a opportunity your not really "qualified" for. thats about it.

alot of qbs hitting the market. josh has dodged the injury bullet matrix style with his style of play i think we need to upgrade the backup spot because as of now josh goes down our season ends. thanks barkley time to look elsewhere.

i could of sworn the fbi was arresting people all over the country, are they not asking questions? people are getting cancelled simply for being in the area having nothing to do with breaking the law or storming the capital while others are being placed on no fly lists as investigations continue. the person everyone feels is responsible just went through a impeachment trial where any and all evidence could have been presented and he is also possibly facing criminal charges from states. banks have closed his accounts, contracts have been negated, blacklists have been made with anyone he was involved with. yeah um a new commission is needed to uncloak this organization shrowded in mystery. 🙄 maybe if they left parler up...they could just READ about it!? yes? no?maybe? that's a no because most the groups formed on FACEBOOK! and facebook does not track a log information so its gone forever. lol hey LA times there a little place close to you were groups are still openly organizing and causing havoc. latest one was blocking police from going to emergency calls, emergency calls are kind of important to regular people. they dont get 24 hour national guard watches and walls. if we learned anything from texas recently is snow storms are minor innconviences and if not, they are just peasants anyhow..no rush. by all means the democrats should finish what they are doing first. https://www.lacortenews.com/n/antifa-blocks-seattle-pd-from-responding-to-emergencies-with-snow-barrier

i love the argument that this government is taken by surprise by anyone. if you believe snowden and anything in the patriot act then they can tap into any phone text or website. yet.. "what is this parlar app?" "is this where the PLANS were made?" " we must BEGIN to watch for this for a protest organized by the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. so either they fully knew about EVERY riot, every plan and every participant and allowed it..again or the fbi/cia was caught off guard and has been proven to be the most inept organizations when it comes to domestic security on the planet.