Buffarukus

i wrote a pretty big paragraph on mandate effectiveness and made reasonable conclusions based on 2 distinctly different ways gov has responded. even included a study but you continue on as if the mandates are without a doubt effective and save lives. i cant do much more to show at this point that it isn't pointing in that direction data wise. i didn't cherry pick cdc, i used it because many have decided its the gold standard of info even though its flip flopped regularly. im glad you agree noone should be fired. when they fight for their job back down the line i hope your on that side. people do have to face the consequences and responsability to one another and my above statement goes into that as well. its not just "them".

well thats not good. glad they reached a agreement. seems like the protestors are being reasonable if confronted with the fact that they are unnecessarily hurting people. it looks like police are clearing them out from what i read so it might be over.

bill mahr has been red pilled to the insanity of his party this season. i highly recommend watching the episodes in full if you havent. aclu, covid, government regulation in his state, censorship. i expect if he keeps it up there hes going to get a "roganing". its pretty interesting predicament leftist shows are in. ratings seem to be tanking so you better shift narratives to get ACTUAL viewers but if you do then the company you broadcast on has to deal with the virtual mob screaming to deplatform. maybe it will force the hand to force stations to realize the internet only gives you ratings when they want to find things to be outraged by. if you want to survive then you better concentrate on building a actual audience and turn off your twitter feed. i dont think having one is worth it if at any moment a slight breeze that pisses em off could force you to be under huge amounts of pressure that destroys the company.

just so you know the protest reached the peace bridge in buffalo last week. the first night traffic on the 190 north was backed up for miles. the second night semis were parked far right on the shoulder and traffic on the thruway could move freely. day three you could tell was backed up but i saw vehicles going over the bridge at a decent pace. i also saw a video where police told truckers around Ottawa they could peacefully protest but must make openings for service vehicles to pass through and they complied. i never seen the actual protest but i don't think its a true blockade. they are making travel difficult to make a point but pretty sure they are not forcing people to be locked in or out.

its interesting that you use alot of nuance to the pandemic response/factors, which is a good thing. im not sure that would explain things as most of your factors can be erased simply by switching to a location that is more similar like California. we should see a significant difference when the approaches were not slightly different, they were completely opposite. i think the answer is when you give people access to options they generally know how to take care of there health and saftey just as much then when the gov forces them on people. so the only absolute i see is alot of economic destruction, segregation and division. the data is not confirming it is worth that damage. you know about the study done by johns hopkins that says exactly that correct? https://www.americanexperiment.org/a-closer-look-at-the-johns-hopkins-lockdown-study/ there is also a study on the ineffectiveness of masks by the cdc. just put it on people in this very thread are saying. go right ahead, the cdc itself conflicts with that. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cdc-admits-cloth-masks-ineffective-armstrong-economics natural immunity is far superior then vaccines. there are multiple studies that have made this conclusion. regardless how long it lasts that should EXEMPT people that are declared unvaxed and DEFINITELY stop them from taking their jobs away. studies, data, science, facts. all things that we were told would be used. so at what point does society admit that at best, it has a very flimsy standing to uphold the mandates? they need to be based on a very solid data stating they are absolutley effective. otherwise how is it not totalitarian? if thats true how do you not stand on the side fighting against it with the truckers. all they are asking is to be left alone and allowed to make their own decisions for their families. its really sad when that is compared to a terroristic threat.

no belief necessary! thats the problem! after all that has been discovered how you can come to such a stringent set of decisions. freedom or death? as if making such a decision will result in a absolute when its been repeatedly shown that's not the case. those are simplistic viewpoints spouted by mainstream media. the fact so many have not investigated on their own, as censored as it is, and fall in line relying on belief and orders from the gov that make no sense is scary. those same people demanding those that don't are the ones who should be punished is what is terrifying. simply asking basic questions is all it takes to understand. why did states that allow freedom not result in far more deaths? this fact alone ends any notion that truckers are not justified. can you answer it? if you can't where is this death or freedom option even coming from. natural immunity is FAR more superior to any vax when it come to developing antibodies and yet these people can't get a exemption? why? what % of people with far better defence to this virus are considered in the "anti vax" group that the government say we must make higher or the public has decided are "dangerous" throughout. when it comes to what this is about. i think its about power but more importantly understanding that admitting to being wrong puts alot of economic and phycological destruction on people who made the wrong choices. all while slandering/censoring those who did so they have dug there feet in all while empowering themselves as virtuous.

whats that at the bottom of the tweet? rand paul calls on truckers? like i said you dont even read your own posts 🤣😄😅😂 dont go deleting this now - KEEP UP! 🤣😂😅😆

iran isnt a deflection. it was a response to you asking for a president who neg with terrorist. you had long list of specifics no one could meet when you asked has this been done. so not sure what that statement meant because i gave examples...they just did not meet your standard so i guess they never happened. truckers is in the damn video you posted with rand paul. so i responded. im not sure you read your own stuff at this point if you think those are deflections. the fact you are making a comparison between trumps economy and biden..one of the two where people are struggling to buy gas because its doubled kind of tells me this conversation will never be honest. the fact you think a 4 year president has done more destruction to ANYTHING then a life long politician whos been involved in presidential decisions for 9 years and in congress since 1972 reveals just how warped your view is. as if trump coverup of Khashoggi is unique to the US longstanding bloodshed for the Saudis. you'll cherry pick it because it pushes your worldview but here's the catch. trump was a piece of s#/t in alot of his decisions. i just dont think he was what the masses were brainwashed he was. he did good things too. that will never be acknowledged by people, like yourself so ill just end it here and let you get back to what you really want. red team vs blue team smackdown session.

i did not get a meme or cupcake reference so that's good. its good you made a opinion on the withdrawal but you are still deflecting. you say who negotiated with terrorist? umm wasnt the iran deal a negotiation with known terrorists? its happen all the time if you include any treaties, ceasefire ect ect with groups. its called compromises to stop bloodshed and all out wars from breaking out. your being hyperbolic so you dont have to confront what i said. hell the taliban was basically recognized and negotiated with the min they took power in the capital in a week..ohhh my god its never happened!! what did we get in return!! idiiiots!! what did we get in return for the millions of dollars in war machines we casually left with the keys in the ignition? has that ever happened before? this was about the incompetence of the operation and how that's perceived by our enemies and how quickly they seem to want to test that incompetence again. truckers aren't terrorist because they are asking for what the government took. nothing more nothing less. your side has been squealing about follow the science for over 2 years!! murders!! same insane dramatics you always use and now that actual studies are finally being done and finding out what you been told THE ENTIRE TIME its hard to admit you were wrong. that comes with a ton of economic and psychological devastation at your feet so i understand. but time keeps marching and more and more will be exposed. cloth masks are useless. natural immunity is superior on and on we go. leave these people alone and allow them to do what best for their families! FREEDOM is the ask but of coarse TERRORIST! NAZI! is the reply. makes alot of sense to the cult i guess. there are more details in your post but i addressed the major ones i think. i know it sucks to be on the side of the one in power. pointing and saying i can do it better when your not doing it is nice and cozy stance free of the actual results of actions. woulda done this and that blah blah blah! now its your chance and we are all paying for the results. embrace it or you can be a unbiased critical thinker and accept that this administration is destroying the country TODAY. more opposition to stop them helps us TOMMORROW. you seem to want to deflect to past admin which does nothing anymore. you should think about that. -40% and dropping. historic low approval. your the cult whether you want to believe it or not. you don't have to be republican! i was no fan in the past and don't even consider it myself. you can be independent, libertarian anything to free yourself. just acknowledge what we all see and most of all..give up the schtick.

your prob right! putin watched the inept military operation that weaponized the enemy with millions of dollars of high tech war machinery, killed service members because it couldn't implement a basic security plan and then proceeded to TARGET innocent people as a "retaliation". hell they were even inept at the lie. the coverup attempt was debunked less then 24 hrs later by every media source we have. yeah, i think he sees a nice opportunity when it comes to this administration. this kind of dysfunctional leadership will be taken advantage of by all our enemies. here's the part where you deflect. funny how putin never tryed to invade anyone for 4 years when his "puppet" would have sat back and let him have it. you cultists can trump your way out of all the disasters this administration is bringing on us. historically low polls shows the flock is getting smaller and smaller. give up the schtick.

vote to order! who here has not prepared a excuse when caught breaking the mandates? 15 people!? come on guys its not like it has to make sense to these fools. reuse the holding breath one during pictures (everyone laughs) now what was it we were really voting on?

i agree with this. there should be a pretext to why people were suspicious of the election but at the end of the day trump had access to the most powerful institutions in the world and plenty of cash to validate his claims. calling out to ordinary people for any reason to fight that battle was a pretty stupid move. if there was fraud then prove it, if not pass the baton and keep fighting afterwards. i think the left should acknowledge the same incompetence with the state funded medical institutions. lack of sensible info. flip flopping. ignoring natural immunity. heavy handed cencorship of what was FACTUAL information. these never relenting mandates that have shown nothing but economic destruction. one of these are still happening as we speak.

news alert live at the scene. Canadian freedom convoy has finally made it to the peace bridge in buffalo ny. traffic backed up for miles, expect delays. ⛟ 👍🇨🇦

maybe people should recognize we need outlets that aren't controlled by others and should fight to protect them from s#/÷ like this. diversity of thought is a good thing. ones that actually succeed and captures a audience beyond reach will always be co-opted or shut down. you have picked your side i guess. i tryed to convince you. the warning can't be any clearer. for the record joe wanted bernie sanders is a liberal and absolutely is not racist. 20 years from cali the bluest state. anyone who thinks he alignes with fox is not familiar with his stances but thats not really required to define people anyways.

im not trying to pick on you. i erased my other book of a reply, if you read it fine. but you are so misinformed my man. perspective. rogan gets 11 million listeners per episode. every major tv show is payed more for production, advertising, and are on major networks. he smashing their ratings. hes been doing his show for 20 years. 2 to 3 hours episodes. how many hours of entertainment compared to a 5 min song? his deal is for exclusivity. musicians can be on multiple platforms getting multiple checks from various means including selling a song for $1 dollar. which is why 1 hit wonders get millions of dollars and can retire into a comfortable life. 1 song. 5 minutes. its $20 for a album. get a fraction of rogans audience to buy just one and your set for life. touring? more $$$! musicians have huge amounts of people to divide money up with though. they sign the deal with the record label, not spotify. joe is literally a two man production who was building a audience from scratch for 2 decades before he got that deal. these things aren't close to each other in pay structure to begin with. to think after a sustained campaign by the media, then gov, and all of a sudden artists. that is just a believable coincedence? suddenly its about how "spotify" pays? somthing joe has nothing to do with? seriously? any word on xm and howard stern or the multitude of other outlets broadcasting music streams with shows that get millions of listeners or is it j conviently just this specific one? yeah he's getting "cancelled".

if the cake ordered was asked to be in the shape of a swaztica and the owners were jewish. should they have to bake it? honest answer? if joe rogans service is talking about subjects you disagree with do you have to listen to it? there is a difference between forcing someone to PROVIDE a service and someone being forced to USE it...or in this case, not use it even if they want to. i don't think spotify wants to remove anything. they are in self preservation mode trying to not give the paranhas anything to latch on to. i wish we weren't in a world view where simple conversation was deemed dangerous. the fact people have a issue he is talking to EXPERTS is pretty scary. after being wrong about so much for so long they still stand on a soapbox as the arbitrator of truth all with state backing. the fact the organizations he is directly competing with are at the for front of the attack. that should be a big red flag of which side they are on and their true intentions. but these are two different issues. you cant create a slope with a example, just when you disagree with it and then talk about how slippery its gotten later on. refusal of service happens all the time for various reasons. you just don't mantle it because it was not shouted through a megaphone for a few months. i can name 100s you would agree with as its been happening long before a baker refused a cake. if you want a acctual example lets talk about refusal of service based on medical history that goes directly against actual LAW, not personal belief. HIPPA is a thing of the past and many love it and advocate it daily..even against children.

i gave a straight answer that had no particular viewpoints besides 1) a parent should have say in what their students should be taught. period. nobody should care whether that is the right or wrong way to look at it because...YOUR NOT THE PARENT. you adding in examples of certain people or viewpoints or wants means nothing. 2) teachers should have a good enough grasp over their curriculum that they can create a standard syllabus. i got one at the start of most my semesters. new teachers it may be difficult for but not where subjects get integrated out of nowhere. for the most part nothing was a surprise to me. what does that have to do with teacher shortages or "karens" calling for firings for not abiding by them in a malicious way? if you cant help yourself but to introduce controversial subject and won't allow parents a opt out option. that's a hard stance for no reason then we are the ones in charge not you, the people who pay our salaries and raise the children in our classes?? what!? what exactly is the school board in charge of? are they there to be just a barrier to protect teachers so they can do as they please or are they there to listen to concerns and oversee it serves the public? watching these meetings it seems like the former. so i dont care how shorthanded teachers are, you obviously can't be trusted with children or act like a professional where you don't have the self control to just teach standard subjects you can openly put on a syllabus. teachers are human and can talk freely but forcing things into curriculums with grading incentives is different, especially if they are not exposing students to a equal counter argument regardless if they personally agree with them. if they cant do this they are BAD TEACHERS creating the echo chamber that your talking about. wanna teach CRT put it in syllabus including the topics that oppose its viewpoints. finally if you want to take your kid out of a class that teaches abstinence. go ahead! right or left view if you'd rather teach YOUR CHILD about a subject in your own way then good on you for being involved parent and crazy on those who want to assert control on children against the parents wishes.

a crazy idea. hear me out. the class is given a syllabus at the beginning of the semester. it has a sign off sheet for the parents. if parents wish there children to learn something else then whats on there. the school offers options. if the teacher is caught giving assignments or forcing participation on subjects parents find controversial, for any reason.. then the teacher is fired. if they are lying about the syllabus..the teacher is fired, and we agree on this. no exceptions. we had to do it with sex ed in my school. why is this a hill so many must die on. the arrogance of we know better then you as a stranger or i only found out this was being taught when...blah blah blah secretive stuff. the fact such young children are being involved makes it all the more creepy. that goes for religious subjects as well....or any subject. the parents have the final say PERIOD. we can all stop arguing what we think other parents kids are exposed to and it will be a better world.

watching the bengals not only stop them for a half but in ot hurts a bit knowing we couldnt do it for 13 seconds. hopefully bengals fans pick a charity on whatever they choose and keep the good deeds forwarding in the AFC.

joe burrow: hey pat can i hold that sickle? things are looking grim 😆 congrats to the bengals. they closed em out. nice to see some fresh blood in the sb. happy for the fans who been droughted so long.

if he wanted a particular person then just pick. nobody would know or care. the fact he makes the anouncment it will be soley on race and gender is a great way to get the go to democratic narrative going to divide people. lets make anyone who thinks picking people on their qualifications, which is the most reasonable thing imaginable into monsters. the great uniter

ticky tack. you do some flat out illegal crap right in front of a ref. thats different.

illegal block in the back twice! clear as day. no wonder mohomes can dance for hours back there.

im not sure why justices cant be a elected position that has a equally diverse representation structure. no, not that diversity. in a perfect world justices would be impartial actors that go strictly by the law. in that case "packing" the court would make no difference. that is obviously not true and should be the main issue the public should be concerned with, not how do i get more of my ideology in there to "win" more. the fact the legislative constantly kicks issues over to courts instead of LEGISLATING is a trend people need to recognize as well. stop getting upset with rulings that have more to do with (this person does not have the POWER to do this). start getting upset the person who thought they did or worse, did not care. a term limit? i dont think that would change much. the party in power will probably throw a nice retirement party and push the judge out the door if a term was anywhere close to ending so they can freshen up "their" judge for another full term. pretty much what's happening. i think this will be the new trend from here on out either way so expect the "teams" to stay the same for a very long time unless something unseen happens to a judge. i do agree having a life long term, people ruling on important issues that have long past anything from their life experience has always been a horrable concept but people love it when looking at our past and current presidents. why do people keep advocating their party subvert the system to gain more power? ending fillabusters, packing courts, ect ect ect. the approval rating for this administration is in the 30%. most people don't want these changes but dems keep pushing on ahead regardless. its pretty troubling how close we are getting to a political party enacting changes that will lead to a 1 party rule. this uncompromising trust that their gov cares about them and will continue to even when they don't need them anymore or have to work with anyone with different viewpoints has made history books pretty thick with the most horrific things humans have done to each other. every one starts with the gov ensuring it is for the best. i certainly hope if the R's get power they dont try a tit for tat strategy and instead enact laws that stop this nonsense from ever taking place again. changes need to happen that stops parties from simply blocking the other side and using suffering as a political tool but those changes should require them to be FORCED to compromise, not ignored. i guess the answer on the court would be find representatives from the major parties and have them select judges they can primary. say 5 repub 5 dems and there can be no hung juries in the judgments they make. so there has to be compromises or at least 1 judge who looks at the case differently. it would be really nice if more parties would finally get some power to add to this concept, libertarians, green party..whoever so the tie breakers would already be ingrained in a less polar structure and clear up all these 1 party power plays on their own.

are you sure about that? it seemed to me most run plays we run are RPOs out of shotgun. if motor got the ball then it was josh making that option alot of the time but im not sure if the specific plays were im really shocked by the amount of people downvoting balance/running. huh? when is having a good rush attack scheme that is more dependable a bad thing? i understand josh is great but the offense is ALWAYS square on his shoulders. giving the guy a break. opening up routes because they have to load the box. less wear and tear/ injury prevention and play action the D have to respect. keep opposition on the bench/end games...all make josh and every other qb in the league better. a improved effective rushing scheme is my answer all day long.