Buffarukus

my donald trump? look ☝️and READ. we all understand you are a brainwashed democrat cultist amongst other things but lets not add you are also illiterate to the list as well. but it does explain alot then.🤔

yeah not a fan of this behavior from a president. but you are! the ton of racist speeches biden gave as a senator? opposing school integration referencing a jungle...yikes. the fact he lost because they found he stole another mans speach as his own like people are idiots... well not back then anyways. his vice president pointing out he's a racist. him pandering to the lowest level by playing a popular latino song at a rally on a cellphone, how embarrassing for him. if you don't vote for me you ain't black. 🙄 i don't work for you!! to a blue collar man asking a question...well that one was true. ect ect ect. constant f ups and lies are ok as long as a D is next to the name. you choose your anger based on political backing. it has no univeral standard. you pick up and drop off your outrage at will. no one believes you.

i agree. at what point do the republicans hold dems accountable? all they do is talk. russiagate was a hoax and it took years to uncover. 1 serious prosecution years later? corona? trillions in damage and lives ruined off clear lies and all its become is a campaign point. all you get is senators making talking points in hearings. when we get in power one day you better believe we will investigate that thing they did before the statute of limitations ran out! its pretty pathetic that a multi billion dollar opposition party is routinely so weak. so they have hunters hard drive you say? meanwhile alex jones is losing millions in defamation, prob correctly, who knew that happens? so while the media slanders along republicans shake their fist at the sky. id say his actions were pretty predictable as the words of dems during blm. you rile a large group of people and stoke anger based on a premise you dont have evidence to back up you should at least step in when things go sideways. the dems had no problem starting bail funds for rioters but i haven't seen him do squat for the people who peacefully entered under police instruction. again Rs play into the double standard and just shake their fist at the sky completely subservient to the jan 6 comitee instead of using their money power to investigate what the dems avoid. security measures, fbi involvment, why they were let in ect ect..."one of these days when we get power we will look into this s#!+!!" this is above. theres a strange grey area the politicians want to play in now that is dangerous. "take to the streets" that isnt advocating rioting. "make them uncomfortable" i didnt say attack anyone. we advocate the right to PEACEFULLY protest judges...which is illegal and ends up with escalation of a assasination attempt. we did say PEACEFULLY "shrug" protest the certification to stop the steal. protest it with no evidence. after all my law suits failing, with fake promises of a big drop by my defense lawyers. on and on you are puting people in a position after gaslighting them for months to stop somthing that id GOING TO HAPPEN. those are easy dot to connect to riot. just because you say, ohhhh noo i cant believe this, i never thought people would be so upset! whoa ways me! then walk away doesnt admonish you were the one who set the dominoes. if the guy had just a tiny sense of understanding of how close this country is to civil war and destruction from policies the elites have been doing for decades he would do one selfless thing. put his ego aside and endorse a canadate instead. hell he can do a biden and pull the strings from behind the curtain but there is just too much ego in his veins. so the prebuilt narrative will be reengaged and "news" org that are currently dying resurrecting garbage. estatic to take up where they left off as he has sit downs with them. people will turn out simply to stop the nazis and america could realistically elect a dem, advocating all this destruction, authoritarianism, globalism, for another 4 years. i don't think this country can endure anymore. we have lost so much that is currently normalising and ill take a solid canidate over a egomaniac that can win the primaries then f it all up blurting some crap out 5hat the media feasts on.

is this a serious question? memory of a very recent pandemic says its all facts. which part do you think is just a feeling is the real question? my only feeling is pessimism. since the same people who pushed/fell for all the bs truley believe they still have a shred of credability at this point. pessimism because of the realization a large swath of our society was perfectly happy to endorse authoritarian control rather then face life with risk, regardless how small. i did not think freedom and truth was so fragile before but here we are. still waiting on where it came from to prevent it from happening. still watching the slow drip of vax studies phizer said they could not put out for 75 years and media to cover it. on and on. now they cant simply give info to people due to fear of offending a group? which is also helping it spread. just a continuation of the same nonsense. i guess this is what we can expect in this country going forward from now on.

feelings over facts...and puss filled pustuls i guess. 😒 if i were a country that say was hostile towards the US. its pretty clear its a great time to release the worst virus you have on hand if you have secretly made a cure. the citizens have great reason to have zero confidence in any guidance given. the scientists that are prescribing this guidance are more concerned about politicizing it and the gov does not seem to care about investigating who, what, when, where, or why it originated. as the population squabbles amongst itself and officials figure out how to manufacture a culture war while bumbling into walls. the eneny can sit back and watch the annihilation.

i agree with this. if there was fraud by all means Republicans leaders need to put up the evidence and show what you got. its been 2 years! its not like the rnc doesnt have the money/power/ or means to conduct whatever investigation is necessary. instead they are relying on ordinary citizens to google evidence and come to conclusions based on accusations up to and including a riot at the capital that many including trump just left them holding the bag when the dust settled. that alone should disqualify rational republicans from assuming he is the great leader they thought he was. someone who fights for them. they missed the part the billionaire stepped up to pay all their legal fees or used any of his platforms to show the american people exactly why he keeps saying that other then broad "they cheated" statements. i really hope he steps aside. there is way to much baggage. alot from people being conned but also alot he created for no reason. at the same time dems are loving stoking the flames further and then complaining (and of coarse also fundraising) that they alone represent democracy that people want. hilarious. my position has always been if you have half the country that has completely lost faith in the democratic process, why are you using all your power pushing some of the same type of blatent lies and villianization you are complaining about? opposing reasonable measures that secure this process isnt a good look. voter ID is as basic as it gets to security. the majority of the country thinks this. nahhh lets call them all racists and fight against something that has always been a basic requirement. mail in was a "necessity" even as the science in human form Fauci stated in person was perfectly safe. dems quick to ignore that one but happy to adhere to the other insane suggestions that ruined lives. so now the excuse is long gone but dems are still fighting to keep that going with no legitamate reason besides trying to maintain democrat power. the list goes on. so dems are doing no favors when it comes to looking incredably corrupt on the topic as well. they are also doing a huge disservice when it comes to uniting anything or making reasonable concessions. voter turn out numbers in georgia after all the "racist jim crow 2.0 suppression" accusations have them looking like fools, but they carry on for power and media just keep echoing it looking just as foolish. the reality to independent americans is they look weak as F that they they have to push this stuff. i guess they feel they have no way to win on the acctual policies they make or they wouldn't be coming across as so desperate. if either side truley cared they would blow it all up and get ranked voting in because this system is completely gutted and used as the main tool to have people at each others throats.

the same 126 that said US inflation was not going to be a issu..is only transitor..is going to get downward pressure from more spendi...[place new extremely credible update here]

you seem so sure from a tweet? that seems to be a theme around here. so its not taught in gradeschool and is a right wing conspiracy? https://www.city-journal.org/nea-to-promote-critical-race-theory-in-schools?wallit_nosession=1 thats the largest teachers union in the US outright admitting it. who states for example. "students in New Hampshire have access to opportunity by recognizing how identity, race, and culture of students and teachers play out in the classroom." 🤔 if thats a good source and they made clear intentions im guessing we will move the topic to what crt is and how it is beneficial. so its a good thing for the kids. thats usually how this conversation evolves and goal post moves once its clear this IS being injected. also injected onto the faculty. sorry its fox but your not going to find this information anywhere "objective". i dont think it makes the vid untrue though i admit its short and edited before pundits show up but this is a quick example how its getting ingrained. you got me researching now. i told you I'm going to crack that walnut sooner or later. anyways my point is not whether crt or sexuality exists in classrooms. im assuming maybe i convinced you. either way, both subjects are controversial, especially for VERY young kids. the point is parents should have a final say and be 100% informed on the syllabus..thats it! thats the big debacle on the subject. if parents overwhelming want it out. take it out. who am I ,YOU or a STATE EMPLOYEE to demand otherwise? they are the PARENTS! if its not there then democrats have nothing to fear. im not sure why this is even a "culture war" issue. instead you have democrats defending to the death that other peoples kids HAVE to be taught this junk or else everyone involved are bigoted/racists. its a very strange side to even be on but are more then happy to scream it from the rooftops. then they say right wingers are the weird ones for wanting it banned so there can be no "mistakes" or rouge teachers after parents say no? hmm. we used to have these lessons called anti-bullying, treating each other as equals. everyone really liked those. people in general aren't in favor of these subjects and stand on the same side so not sure how ron made the comparison to begin with. sorry to derail the thread but you did bring it up.

ok so you havent seen the examples of teachers injecting strange race based questions into grade school work? you haven't seen teachers caught talking about it when they were zooming during the pandemic? im also guessing you also haven't seen the insane teachers talking about pronouns and hiding sexual orientation from parents for young grade school kids. libsoftictock alone has found quite a few self admitting for a brief start. i have no clue how far reaching or there are isolated incidents as i haven't investigated deeply. if you really believe the uproar is from a bunch of parents angry that their adult child is learning somthing at a college level or all this is a just a absolute republican myth that doesnt exist then i think you should research what some parents are finding and also ask why dems are defending it at every level

both ways? no. both are strangers demanding subjects be taught by other strangers to peoples children, regardless of the parents wishes. its very weird how important it is to democrats in both cases, but carry on with the thread.

no they will spin you guys up into the next we must stop them frenzy. desantis hasn't reached trump levels yet, but he's getting there just as the runner up. dont say gay!!!!??? you make them too much easy money to stop now. prepare to fight the evil overlord foor ev eerrr.

either way at least our conversations don't implode into name calling and meme wars. maybe thats not a good thing because i think i can get into that walnut and crack it at some point and this is all false hope. 😅 regardless, my original question of how you declare yourself a sanctuary and at the same time not have that become a open invitation to people around the world to not see that as a reason to attempt a very dangerous treck to take is a important one. if it can't be answered it means there will ALWAYS be a crisis. there will ALWAYS be criminals ready to exploit it and it means there will be a HUGE strain on feds to uphold the boarder..just because you are publically announcing it. you advocate that local should not help and that the entire country should become a sancuary for just one of the negative effects they face..collaborating with police safely. which is just one of many that must be overlooked. but i ask you look beyond that to the other reprocussions that can be avoided by simply stating..if you come, do so legally because we will not harbor you. your saftey is more important then my public virtue signal. but this is about elections and peoples snap emotions so its impossible. even if they did not prosecute or whatever sanctuary "really" means. do it privately! that would at least make a difference imo. but when a open invitation is out there from several states what else could someone possibly expect but for people to risk everything and trust a pos that says he will take you and 50 others across to this utopia in a trailer..as one of MANY grim examples. trust to give a "guide" your children and prey they get there. it promotes the good in our society but at the same time encourages people to become completely vulnerable to pure evil. it provides cover for those who wish to smuggle the leading cause of death in this country of our young. that only gets worse the more its advocated and announced. unintentional is no longer a excuse. ill fight along side you to change immigration law and allow good hardworking people a chance at freedom. covering my eyes to the downstream effects of people advocating they break it as if they are not directly related..no.

but coming to this country illegally is a crime. you are saying red states should ignore it. im not generally disagreeing with you if illegals are living peaceful productive lives. but im not going to ignore the basis of what a sanctuary state is saying. come illegally and you will no longer have to worry about this crime. that is signaling to people around the world..cross illegally and come to us and we will protect you. that's not good in any sense for the multitude of reasons i laid out. people are dying, kids are being trafficked ect ect ect and you are essentially saying endorse it regardless of laws. i drill down to specifics with you as i did with our other conversation...the covid whoopsies! remember? and i think you don't have a good response so you kind of generalize and ignore them. in the whoopsie case your response was, things are hard to get done in the government. ignoring all the work i put into showing clear evidence people who spent their entire lives in virology were either lying or unbelievably wrong in the field they spent their education and lives. in this case we are going in circles on what a sanctuary is actually promoting and its effects. at the end of the day empathy feels great. id love to take that side but know full well that their are major repercussions and victims being produced from this so ill stand up to highlight regardless of what others think, right wing nazi yada yada. the truth is empathy is just as dangerous as hatred if just blindly followed, even more so because its camouflaged. we see alot of negative effects that many ignore with this as everyone wishes to be on the right side of things, thats not necessarily the one you can advertise. sorry I'm ranting on here again. i think we should agree to disagree as maybe you just don't see my point.

ill accept this but all your saying is that mayors that oppose the illegal entry into the country and will not provide cover for this act....should. they should make illegal aliens as comfortable as sanctuary states to speak to police without reprocussions. nothing can be done about this issue federally because its not popular. this doesn't change my original point. you have 2 choices. follow the law or change it. because you say we can't change it and we are in a broken system you want a third choice. ignore it and condemn those who choose not to. (not you directly but many liberals..racist! is the usual response) do it because it creates problem (about police) but ignore the problems created BY IGNORING it. housing, shelter, funds, the response from aliens that continue to enter thinking they can find this guarenteed sanctuary, cartels taking advantage of this, immigrants left in a truck on the side of the road to die on this quest, trafficking...the list goes on. those are direct responses to american leaders saying if you come i will provide cover regardless if the intention is for current or incoming. you see that right? so there is a flip of this coin that liberals completely ignore. so lets change it to a different question. how do you offer sanctuary and avoid that being a signal to make a dangerous journey and avoid all the horrable reprocussions the southern boarder are facing by people in search of it? i dont think you can so maybe stop declaring this and work on daca? im genuinely unsure but tired of this liberal ideology that runs purely off empathy with no regards to disastrous effects downstream. its all over the place in their ideology.

i gave several different points of info to say regardless how grandfatherly he does things. the influx is extremely high. i gave examples of 2 democratic mayors who provide "sancuary" saying it is a problem for the state. dc saying rep are "tricking" them to going there. ny adams saying he needs fed help as the system cant handle the economics of all the new people. goose is saying another issue exists. the fact their status makes them unable to speak with authorities in reference to crime. we can go on and on about problems that are created and im suggesting the root is american leaders not outright opposing people come in illegally but instead many are encouraging it. the fix is not to continue down this path. its to either A uphold the law or B change the law. instead dems want a C ignore it and complain about the multitude of issues that result. thats the conversation. now im in some side issue where you seem to ve suggesting the problem does not exist due to deportation numbers against ALL information that is available. im not ready to even debate something so clear based on another consequence. more illegals equals more deportations...hell trumps remain in mexico policy alone would make less deportations necessary yet your holding this one statistic as some truth to derail what i am saying in the first place.

is that a response to my statement? is there not the biggest influx of illegals coming into this country under this administration? pretty easy to deport really high numbers when there are so many to deport and historic numbers not deported, but ill choose which statistic i like and go with that. is that the variance? anyways, anything on federal law and why its not just being ignored but ENCOURAGED to be ignored and how that effects the situation we were speaking of. think its making it better or worse overall. id say worse and thus more deportations for your comparison. maybe you think trump was soft on immigration? duopoly, interesting word. do something illegal we will not care yet we will talk about the negative effects these people face after we encouraged the illegal activity to happen. is that a good definition of the word. seems like it. may need a thesaurus to continue. every media station has said the southern boarder is a mess and even ny and dc mayors are talking about the hardships they are now faced with dealing with the influx.so its not bias speaking, with me anyhow.

so why is there no pressure to fix it at the national level? seems as though this administration has clear intentions of not enforcing the law yet none to reform it either causing more of said problems you are implying. so YOU have 2 choices. invite illegal aliens to your state knowing full well they are breaking the law to begin with and tell them you will provide cover, thus promoting more illegals into crossing for this arangment and then talking about problems..scared to talk to police. or tell illegals you will not provide cover for a illegal act and instead fight for congress to make necessary changes where "undocumented" is not a major issue by giving citizenship or making legal crossings more attainable. thus they can move/ live free in our society without relying on states to declare they are accomplices to a boarder crisis/illegal citizenship as if its no big deal. declaring you are breaking federal law is becoming pretty common. states just giving the finger as they see fit and we wonder why civil war is on the table.

maybe have legal immigration that documents people? 🤔 if that is a issue..hear me out. you fight to fix the policies to make it cheaper/easier to become a citizen? instead of "welcoming" people who brake the law and saying thier are issues that arise for not doing so. leftists love to look straight past options that involve actually doing the right thing as if there simply no personal choices in this world.

i like the optimism but cant think of a better time unfortunately. im not sure how divided they are? wouldn't internal opposition be quickly crushed as is the major advantage of authoritarian communists? but speaking of divided check out this message board. we are the ones talking about civil war. add to that economic issues and already engaged in a full scale proxy war with russia. the only reason russia hasn't ran through Ukraine is the West's involvement. fighting 2 wars - one directly would be pretty terrifying just economically let alone loss of american life. im not sure of Taiwanese military capability but i cant see them defending effectively just due to numbers. also on the divided topic their are Taiwanese citizens that do ethnically consider themselves part of china. this opinion is just from bits and pieces of different stories so i can be way off base. my overall thinking is the US is looking to withdrawal vital manufacturing and then leave them to fend for themselves. so i think we will try not to instigate any early aggression until we take what we want. then its just another hong kong and we will see its people pleading for freedom and US intervention as they are overtaken to our silence on CCP as been the norm for most the world for awhile. its what happens when you rely soley on their manufacturing. the world isnt even demanding answers on a virus that killed millions so i think its clear we are already well under their thumb. pretty bleak right? not sure what makes this different then any other time we look the other way, including their current genocide campaigns. 😔😡🤬

it explains alot.

my mistake hypersonic but maneuverable like sub. im sure you can find better link then this is the first i found. https://www.timesofisrael.com/china-secretly-tests-earth-circling-nuclear-capable-hypersonic-missile-report/ i also believe russia used one early in the war in Ukraine, obviously not nuclear, just to show they had the capability and it was extremely accurate. https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/22/europe/biden-russia-hypersonic-missiles-explainer-intl-hnk/index.html i hope the billions we spend on defense has a answer for these weopons or like i said all our capabilities are mute when it comes to threats. saber rattle one of these and you have no choice but to listen regardless of command structure. the fact two inferior militaries have these weopons gives me some security ours is prepared...hopefully. our officials at least "acted" surprised by the capabilities.

i think your right on some level. thier military is quickly gaining pretty impressive capabilities. they have no issue showing off their subsonic warheads capable of long distances that cannot be intercepted. that alone makes any military disadvantage mute as tipping one with a nuke means instant mutual destruction. maybe not even mutual, depending on how quickly we can fire our own...I'm sure we have them but have not publically demonstrated. pretty scary. i will never for the life of me understand why the west is so eager to support and allow a country that is so outspoken on their hostilities. they sit back while china continues to gain so much economic power from the very people in which they are intent on overtaking. china has easily taken advantage of our biggest weakness. greed and corruption of government/corporate leadership to the deficit of its peoples national security. its a waiting game and are more then willing to sit back and loan us the trillions, sell us slave labor until we hang ourselves.

lol didnt know that. the dominoes are really falling now! the racist systemics are everywhere!! wait who wore cloths first!? specifically goofy scarfs in the summer?? minorities were involved with inventing soy lattes! please tell me soy latte is not supporting the patriarchy!! where does it start and when will it end!! 😂🤣😄😅

lol investagtive reporter billstime has gathered the evidence. you got me!! i call people idiots all the time. s#it talking is great! i work with men in maintenance so we tend to dig alot deeper then "idiot". my mother would be very upset by their words lol. im not on a soapbox saying noone can "poke fun". worlds a better place with inclusion and having a sense of humor. I'm just saying your a hypocrite.

no, you just call people idiots. very offensive to cognitively challenged folks that struggle with their disability every day. being someone suffering from terminal cult issues yourself. you should probably lay off that label as well.