Buffarukus

hmm strange takeaway from the post. how about this simplification? crazy people live in our society. repeatedly after something like this happens we hear how there were tons of glaring red flags showing this person was indeed crazy and should have been closely monitored. so we can try to do something new where things like kids threatening to shoot up schools or say posting racist videos online for all to see talking about black supremacy and killing white and asian folks are taken MUCH more seriously. or we continue to figure out afterwards what side of the isle the crazy person latched on to and use THAT as a justification for why they were crazy. the latter has been going on for awhile now, interestingly without results. but continue on.

recent tragedies say, shut up. NY subway shooter..still alive suv driver in Wisconsin..still alive school shooter in texas..still alive, and was also allowed to bond out of prison. but keep the bs narratives going so people stay divided. if you took a look at what these psychopaths were reading before they killed innocent people it looked exactly like your dumb ass post that propetuates these things further.

found a tragedy to set up a little soapbox on and convict everyone who may not have the same ideology. i live in the city. all i can hope is race baiting vultures like this spreading their garbage dont get anyone else hurt here.

of coarse he would. victims only know how to be victims.

jesus! our government has such low expectations. so "adding" legislation to billions of dollars of aid to make sure it is spent properly would take too long? wouldn't want our elected officials to work hard, fast to do something properly. you'd think that would kind of be built into every aid package. that's what people with a functioning gov would expect. not only do some of us not expect it, we get mad and start threads about anyone points it out?

your percentages almost show why this may not be the god given right the left claims. there is a varying opinion on what should be a reasonable cut off date. your arguing about the percentages of people who think it should be legal but also showing the vast amount of OPINIONS that people have about when life starts. that alone should give people pause for a second to think about the gravity of the subject. what your showing is there are a array of people that think it is murder after a certain time or certain circumstances. i think that means we as a nation have needed to have some very difficult conversations about creating a very logical science based cutoff point. this is not simplistic as for or against. there are philosophical ways to poke holes in even logical outlooks. life doesnt begin until the 2nd tri? so if someone attacks a pregnant woman before that stage can he be charged with murder because she planned on giving birth? so are intentions introduced in deciding whether she has life in her? having the supreme court rule it has kinda swept the subject under the rug. i guess its time to really hold our elected officials accountable to have this discussion. the votes can change this if the percentages work out the way you say which is kinda the point right. if it is outlawed why isnt that under the same circumstance as other debated topics that threaten both women and men that is up to the state? defunding police, concealed carry laws ect ect. alot of health and saftey issues affecting young women in states in general yet this one is the one that MUST be ruled by supreme court and getting everyone angry? as for the GOP hiding behind the supreme court. this is both sides and abortion has very much been a political football. please watch this from a very progressive krystal ball that explains how what we are doing in this thread is exactly the point and dems play their role well. at the end you point out the hipocracy of the right when it comes to funding the very children they wish to protect. at the same time the left is saying that not only can we do it but its our god given right so keep your nose out..and help pay for it. if you think its murder, you better help pay for the childs health care? is there a option where people who don't agree with it not forced to help? both sides just instantly flip when it comes to women making personal medical decisions right down party lines. a second ago the left demanded med info and procedures under threat of losing their livelihoods without a care from the left and the same villianizing. not trying to argue as i think we mostly agree on this topic when all things boil down but i havent changed my stance on womens privacy, have you? just some things to think about.

where did you watch it? buddy sent me a link. but i don't click those.

not really sure why there is blame to the extent on either side. united states is basically little tribes of democracy. hell we have states that outright refuse legislation from the federal level and yet state governments still blame there issues on it. you wanna see the success or failure of your ideology then simply look at the state that has the most laws that align with your view. pretty crazy that most dont want to believe the results they wish to prescribe on all others even when they are obviously destructive. covid was a excellent lesson in this and shows how many simply refuse to say i was lied to, i was wrong and i should shut my mouth and pay more attention to who and where i get "trusted" information.

im sure this has been discussed so excuse my questions if they are redundant. why hasnt congress voted on abortion as the dems have had super majority in the past? i saw this and it raises good points. second why is abortion considered a human right that states cannot legislate themselves? what makes this any different then the different laws for health and saftey that states are responsible for? i dont like aspects of bail reform measures in NY as i feel it puts dangerous people on the street. that infringes on my and my love ones saftey. others may not like gun laws ect ect. the choice is to vote or move. is this much different? my personal opinion is the two extremes of outright banning or get one whenever are both probably supported by fringe of Americans.

in a state that in no way would lose any abortion rights attacking people that have nothing to do with a decision. makes total sense. are stores that sell condoms and birth control next? they been stopping abortions for years. 🤔

it seems to go both ways as with all things political. the left seems ok with ending life before it begins but fighting to defend it when that life was used to destroy others (death penalty). of coarse we get the exact flip of the coin on the right. saving a mothers life aside which is not really in debate anyways. which seems more worthy to defend? a unborn child or a convicted felon? just strange how even hypocracy on how "precious" life is can be changed quickly when looked through a political lens. im personally ok with both. women can choose but so can a court if someone uses their life to cause nothing but pain and destruction on others...both should be concidered extreme and serious.

good find. your right that cultist is insane! what is she even talking about? could you imagine if instead of just being ramblings of a random person the entire republican party decided that this nonsense was true? no factual basis required. just one day decided jackie O was alive and everyone better start looking or else. that be really idiotic. who would support that insanity? oh, by the way, could you please tweet back ron that "women" do not exist and are nothing more then a social construct. gender is fluid. his ignorant labeling creates trauma. if he doesnt use the government appoved (birthing person) in his tweets i will have no choice but to protest his employer. i cant stand bigots like him!! also around last week our president decided the first amendment no longer covers misinformation he is helping spread. dhs has been notified. i can't stand radicals like him! tib, you just spread it too! i guess ill let you off with a warning cause you seem like a decent non birthing entity. what were we talking about again? oh yeah those insane trumpers and the cult they are in. 🤪

there ya go. so far left they push another common sense liberal who is on the team to the right. the flock just keeps getting smaller. when all is said and done who will bring home the wokey award by being the one TRUE victim? keep us updated.

head scratcher simply because i think they really like his effort and locker room leadership but i dont think you pick a guy that has no shot to compete for a start this early. hes slated to be in a role you just extended a very good starter? so a STmer that may replace milano way down the road or maybe milano at mlb if Edmunds leaves? we have had issues with titans, ne, Indianapolis, big physical run teams, just as much as a fast twitch kc team. a cb that has tackling issues and a undersized lb has me worried we may be leaning to far in the speed direction. glad the dl looks to be much better so maybe thats the reason. or maybe they have a exotic nickel type package or two so the kid has at least a chance to get on the field.

ehh i been hearing section 230 alot and its pretty convienent to have that seriously brought up only now, trump did have his chance as well mind you but i think as for platform rules the free market will decide if elons changes are a success for most changes implemented. seeing as offering free speach will be "unique" for a established platform. sorry but i don't want this administration touching something along the lines of what's "misinformation" in a law. im sure both sides would love to convien to bring society back to the days of 3 tv stations of certified gov approved info as controlling the narrative has spiraled out of their control...more so one side. but i would support common sense changes like doxxing having harsh penalties and death threats and such. as of now these things seem to not even be taken seriously and people do them pretty freely without any regard to a punishment.

it would just be nice to see a platform adhere to a straight forward set of common sense rules and implement them evenly. i hope this isnt about "allowing" a type of extremism, what your calling far right but instead ALSO removing the other side of extremism that has become normalized simply by the platform and corp media ignoring.

musk is looking at this thread licking his lips. this is prob 100 grand in cut and paste revenue from a single user alone. bad side is he says he will try cleaning up the bots so you may suddenly vanish. either way 😏 good stuff ahead. 👍

holy crap. the dems arent playin around. that campaign is going to be brutal. rich and poor arent the same, the less you make the more skin in the game. ohhh man its catchy too. how bout this democrats 2022 this party has got it locked down! oh thats good. what on earth can republicans hit them back with? nothin! thats what! little nitpicking chumps dont have a thing, right billstime. the social work interns have reimagined these streets into peace festivals. people losing all this weight from jogging for their lives everywhere in the city. avoiding needless expensive crap like food and shelter. never been better! can't wait for the blue monsooooooon!!!!

no i definitely do not read what you post but you say you read the bill? so you just cut and paste lies on what it can enforce for what...propaganda? then switch to "what it really means" lol do leftists ever dm you asking you to stop making them look bad? anyways happy easter billstime. hope you have a good one. take a day off from defending groomers and enjoy the family..bro. 🐰

cut and paste opinion from a twitter thread to give billstime a perspective for him!? shocking! impressive research as usual. lets see..... mathew chapman a program developer "on the spectrum" is the new cult leader for billstime or is dreamweasel? whenever you want to cut and paste from the actual bill that "conversations on the existence of families with two moms and dads is illegal". so many members have gone through this bs with you repeatedly. how bout just this one time. you actually read the bill and back up what nonsense twitter oops i mean you say. its more reading then twitter but no memes to distract you. so on the pdf its page 4 #3 that most closely resembles the lie your trying to tell. ill hold my breath waiting on any new information.

by the way you argue topics it no wonder why you are so desperate to push rhetoric on little kids, cause you show no signs of being able to defend it to a adults. bro.

from what i read and its alot of longform law talk. its basically says you must notify parents of any mental or physical behavioral issues that are noticed in children. something one would think is standard and unnecessary. guess not because not only is it not standard but people..actively fight against it!? the big one is teachers cannot enact a curriculum where sex or gender identity is taught in k through 3. a curriculum as in a topic or class taught. nothing to do with answering a child's questions in class or independently, they just cant construct a curriculum on it. i would think this would also be standard for a school to inform parents if a child is bringing up certain adult topics and a parent should be aware of that curiosity and handle it in the best way THEY see fit. if there's anything that seems out of line or transphobic..its not in there as its been pointed out the "dont say gay" bill doesn't say anything about gay at all. media and leftists decided teachers should have the ability to. 1) keep parents in the dark about any issues kids may have which can include something such as gender dysphoria as a example, thats not in the bill. so what about depression? what about showing signs of ADHD ect ect. if a teacher sees signs of a disorder what in the world makes people think this info should not be informed to the parent and that schools can unilaterally become aware or worse treat a condition without parental consent? 2) parents should not be aware of specific topics being taught in class and k through 3 is a good time to teach kids adult topics in a age range they still believe fat men fly with reindeer and giant bunnies give them candy. again what exactly are people fighting against here besides a republican put it out so i need to fight against it.

this entire thread you look really desperate to want adult strangers to talk to young children about sexuality without the parents knowing. the bill is for ANY sexuality, gay, straight..any! they are fng children man. that's it! media says its for gay only and you all blindly rush towards that virtue signal to blindly follow their bs rhetoric. but its not a cult. biology and teaching about sex ed, trans, gay whatever can come later when they are older in school or at any time by the parent. no law against that. the hell is wrong with you people? you ask when do people know when they are straight, who cares! the question is when is it appropriate to teach sex ed!? so twist it into anything you need to try and live with that fact. bring up criminals doing criminal things to just use as a talking point as if they even relate to the topic of the lefts infatuation with young children. seeing the left and yourself desperately NEEDING to do this is as sick as it gets. get ahold of yourself and read the bill. if you oppose it, seriously stay away from kids cause there is something very wrong with you. no joke.

what law would you like used to stop the mass migration of millions of illegal immigrants into this country? because thats all this is about. conservatives simply want laws to be upheld, any law that will contain the crisis that has been going on since biden stepped into office will do. no fed authoritarian over reach needed. title 42 is just a placeholder that is completely in line with what democrats have been happy to enforce on its own citizens for a very long time. regardless of these facts and studies that they miraculously now want to stop censoring and ignoring. funny how that happens when its a issue they seem to care about. just another hipocracy shown as the ( all clear ) signal is turned on. all clear to enter, as our young children are still being forced into masks all day. all clear as our countrys own citizens who had natural immunity are still looking for work after being fired...ect. ect. ect. ect. the data on what restrictions were necessary was made by simply comparing florida to california. no significant differences saving lives. clear data quite awhile before your jan/dec (of this year!??) assessment. so again, what law can republicans use to stop the onslaught of illegal immigration? as the dollar continues to lose its value. as our president warns us to prepare for the upcoming food shortages. oh! and a war going on with plenty of enemies out there that would love nothing more then to infiltrate a weak point and destroy us. saftey was REALLY important to the dems just a second ago. so whenever joe wants to pick a law im sure conservatives will agree with it and be more then happy to end any title 42 talk. just as long as it actually gets enforced.