Buffarukus

holy crap. the dems arent playin around. that campaign is going to be brutal. rich and poor arent the same, the less you make the more skin in the game. ohhh man its catchy too. how bout this democrats 2022 this party has got it locked down! oh thats good. what on earth can republicans hit them back with? nothin! thats what! little nitpicking chumps dont have a thing, right billstime. the social work interns have reimagined these streets into peace festivals. people losing all this weight from jogging for their lives everywhere in the city. avoiding needless expensive crap like food and shelter. never been better! can't wait for the blue monsooooooon!!!!

no i definitely do not read what you post but you say you read the bill? so you just cut and paste lies on what it can enforce for what...propaganda? then switch to "what it really means" lol do leftists ever dm you asking you to stop making them look bad? anyways happy easter billstime. hope you have a good one. take a day off from defending groomers and enjoy the family..bro. 🐰

cut and paste opinion from a twitter thread to give billstime a perspective for him!? shocking! impressive research as usual. lets see..... mathew chapman a program developer "on the spectrum" is the new cult leader for billstime or is dreamweasel? whenever you want to cut and paste from the actual bill that "conversations on the existence of families with two moms and dads is illegal". so many members have gone through this bs with you repeatedly. how bout just this one time. you actually read the bill and back up what nonsense twitter oops i mean you say. its more reading then twitter but no memes to distract you. so on the pdf its page 4 #3 that most closely resembles the lie your trying to tell. ill hold my breath waiting on any new information.

by the way you argue topics it no wonder why you are so desperate to push rhetoric on little kids, cause you show no signs of being able to defend it to a adults. bro.

from what i read and its alot of longform law talk. its basically says you must notify parents of any mental or physical behavioral issues that are noticed in children. something one would think is standard and unnecessary. guess not because not only is it not standard but people..actively fight against it!? the big one is teachers cannot enact a curriculum where sex or gender identity is taught in k through 3. a curriculum as in a topic or class taught. nothing to do with answering a child's questions in class or independently, they just cant construct a curriculum on it. i would think this would also be standard for a school to inform parents if a child is bringing up certain adult topics and a parent should be aware of that curiosity and handle it in the best way THEY see fit. if there's anything that seems out of line or transphobic..its not in there as its been pointed out the "dont say gay" bill doesn't say anything about gay at all. media and leftists decided teachers should have the ability to. 1) keep parents in the dark about any issues kids may have which can include something such as gender dysphoria as a example, thats not in the bill. so what about depression? what about showing signs of ADHD ect ect. if a teacher sees signs of a disorder what in the world makes people think this info should not be informed to the parent and that schools can unilaterally become aware or worse treat a condition without parental consent? 2) parents should not be aware of specific topics being taught in class and k through 3 is a good time to teach kids adult topics in a age range they still believe fat men fly with reindeer and giant bunnies give them candy. again what exactly are people fighting against here besides a republican put it out so i need to fight against it.

this entire thread you look really desperate to want adult strangers to talk to young children about sexuality without the parents knowing. the bill is for ANY sexuality, gay, straight..any! they are fng children man. that's it! media says its for gay only and you all blindly rush towards that virtue signal to blindly follow their bs rhetoric. but its not a cult. biology and teaching about sex ed, trans, gay whatever can come later when they are older in school or at any time by the parent. no law against that. the hell is wrong with you people? you ask when do people know when they are straight, who cares! the question is when is it appropriate to teach sex ed!? so twist it into anything you need to try and live with that fact. bring up criminals doing criminal things to just use as a talking point as if they even relate to the topic of the lefts infatuation with young children. seeing the left and yourself desperately NEEDING to do this is as sick as it gets. get ahold of yourself and read the bill. if you oppose it, seriously stay away from kids cause there is something very wrong with you. no joke.

what law would you like used to stop the mass migration of millions of illegal immigrants into this country? because thats all this is about. conservatives simply want laws to be upheld, any law that will contain the crisis that has been going on since biden stepped into office will do. no fed authoritarian over reach needed. title 42 is just a placeholder that is completely in line with what democrats have been happy to enforce on its own citizens for a very long time. regardless of these facts and studies that they miraculously now want to stop censoring and ignoring. funny how that happens when its a issue they seem to care about. just another hipocracy shown as the ( all clear ) signal is turned on. all clear to enter, as our young children are still being forced into masks all day. all clear as our countrys own citizens who had natural immunity are still looking for work after being fired...ect. ect. ect. ect. the data on what restrictions were necessary was made by simply comparing florida to california. no significant differences saving lives. clear data quite awhile before your jan/dec (of this year!??) assessment. so again, what law can republicans use to stop the onslaught of illegal immigration? as the dollar continues to lose its value. as our president warns us to prepare for the upcoming food shortages. oh! and a war going on with plenty of enemies out there that would love nothing more then to infiltrate a weak point and destroy us. saftey was REALLY important to the dems just a second ago. so whenever joe wants to pick a law im sure conservatives will agree with it and be more then happy to end any title 42 talk. just as long as it actually gets enforced.

supremists infiltrated? hmmm never thought of that. i was wondering why the democrats set up funds to bail out the rioters and refused federal support to stop them. makes sense now. 👍

i doubt it. more like how to make a beer can into a crack pipe and alot of financial info on big guys but since you bring it up. the lefts position was to burn it all to the ground for awhile there. when the right joins in you get all pearl clutchy about preserving buiildings and demanding justice? what changed? was it the innocent civilians and buisnesses? the right didnt attack enough of em before going for the federal building?

wait, what? ignore? lol a full impeachment trial and over a year of investigations using every federal resources with full media coverage every step of the way. the entire corporate press machine colluding with the federal goverment to coverup for over a year easily convincing idiots theres nothing to see here. these are the two things you comparing when it comes to ignoring? your not a serious person. november is coming and that labtop is going to be a real problem for you, the crackhead and grandpa. tick. tick. tick.

its good to do what your doing as your right. as long as it is on topic, in most cases i see it is. you also use the post as a tool to redirect things back on track instead of what others do..try their best to derail a thread they don't like the discussions on or let it devolve into pages of arguments and whatabouts..which we are all guilty of at some level i guess. at the same time. i think that you should at least add a touch of personal thought and context as well though. adding information not easily found is fine but what is it about that information that you feel is important? do we auto assume when you post a story info that you agree with everything it is saying every time?

cut and pasting twits that are pure satire again? let me get this straight. the woman who left Libya a complete cesspool. that has given rise to slavery! today! a slave trade is going on right now over there because of her. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/11/27/clinton-ponders-2020-run-lets-not-forget-her-real-libya-scandal-glenn-reynolds-column/895853001/ thats the woman we should listen to who "warned" us about a WAR VET. who..went on television show? whew! good thing biden got in or who knows what russia would be up to now adays.

kind of helps when the president doesn't announce his leniency. states don't announce that they will take any and all no questions asked, administration doesnt purposefully villianize/ penalize boarder patrol that are doing their job off of one propaganda photo that even the photographer immediately said was a lie. on and on. anything rep said or did to prevent this situation was called the same old racist, supremist, blah blah this is on purpose and it is 100% democrat run crisis they want. which is why they gaslit everyone to normalize it over the years as preparation.

i never thought a man could afford a closet full of scarfs to wear in warm weather or 10 dollar a cup "coffee" addiction either. all things seem possible through liberalism.

i dont really write out those points to change anyones mind on here. most people are firmly implanted and wont budge even when confronted with logic and reason regardless. i argue with [ billstime ] afterall. but there are lurkers, there are people unsure, and hopefully maybe a few read what i say and look alittle deeper. prob wasting my time like you suggest but its not hurting me to put it out there.

seemed to be prominent only when it comes to police. can you name 3 victims of police violence that were white? if you cant then seems as though lives mattering may not be as simple as color of someone skin. if you can then maybe its something that effects "all lives" and could be less divisive in the name. statistic state you should know alot of names and faces from all walks of life. yes? if we are talking specific to black issues and lives. why dont we see large blm showing support to the hundreds of thousands murdered each year? i see small anti violence groups wondering why there are no large gatherings or media attention to support justice for there friend or family after they just watched the world put the words on signs, instsgram ect ect. even if blm itself is responsible! secoriea turner. Horace Lorenzo Anderson who had blm activist stop police and medical personnel and cleaned the scene of evidence afterwards. i dont see blm protesting the inner city gang affiliates that will take black lives tonight, tomorrow on and on you will never know, because i guess lives in street violence, even children, don't matter. i dont see blm protesting the media who at best glosses over and at worst covers up the daily violence in their stories unless it has a sick division that they can focus on. coverage would be attention, attention means it matters. i don't see any big campaigns to track down missing minorities at any level of gabby patito case. so again, what does blm stand for and why in the world would anyone want to single out a particular group when it comes to murder or wrongdoing by the powerful of any race when we ALL should be against it and we ALL want the forgotten to matter. all lives matter seems a bit more simple to me but then certain people wouldn't get that polarization that they planned.

you know, im really starting to wonder if cornpop was a "really bad dude" now. i think cornpop was just a nice guy who saw a rich weirdo at a public pool sniffing hair and asking kids to touch his leg hair so was going to kick bidens #$$ mr pop if your out there. i want you to know your an american hero sir!

wow points really go right over your head don't they. i got a little more then nothing. i got a nuclear war about to go off in europe. i got hyper inflation and gas prices crushing my friends and family. i got a impending food shortage scaring the crap out of younger people i know asking if i can loan them money so they can stock up. i got people more scared about their future TODAY then i have ever seen in my lifetime. and i also got about 35% percent of the country, including yourself, that are more concerned about what the previous president was doing then holding the one who is currently watching all this happen accountable. as you say so often idiots.

damn you! im melting under the billstime pressure! especially when you type out your laughter at the end of statements like a teenager. so to answer all your questions before i melt for good. this is all i need to know to talk russia into not killing thousands of people. to stop russia from pointing nuclear warheads at our allies to not have sonic warheads from being fired at Ukrainian cities. biden could have prevented this war by scheduling 141 meetings with russia, sharing his disapproval poll numbers and facilitating trumps banned twitter from kamala.

so if putin attacks america, bidens fault. if they attack Ukraine trumps. not sure on the difference or why that event is specific to biden if they attack america you'll blame trump. who are you kidding.

holy crap you like to box people in. you put a hell of alot of words in my mouth there bud. one example. trump said mexico would pay for the wall. it was a lie and his supporters should hold accountable for that. see how easy that is? how un cultish it sounds now let me tell you!! MEXICO was getting freebies from obama! they got used to it so them not paying for it is obamas fault!!! thats exactly what your doing just flip the narrative. that's cultish. just cause your on the opposing side doesnt mean your any less of member of the indoctrinated. so then you put out a list of what "conald" has done? i see alot of hyperbole there to try to make a point. your someone who still believes in russia gate even as every credible unbiased journalist has debunked it and now outed it as a dem plot. so forgive me for not taking your list as pure facts. regardless of how much you want to start and stop the history of american russia relations with trump the outcome of any of those things was not hundreds of thousand dead civilians and the western world on the brink of nuclear war. that's what is happening RIGHT NOW! mass murder who benefits!!??? i gave a answer to your question...for starters. then asked a few of my own. you neglected even acknowledging any of it and shifted right back to trump to ask me again. as usual.

he ran on returning the US to the position of strength and leadership that the previous administration destroyed, somthing along them lines. i will deal with russia, putin knows me and i am not to be messed with blah blah campaign. the point im making is leftists seem to absolve biden of everything that has gone wrong under the "its trumps fault" narrative as if the problems were unforeseen. the economy is in the tank. "well there is covid" and because of TRUMP." biden knew very well there was covid and ran on "crushing the virus". so how are they excusing him when he in fact does worse then trump? same here. now that we are a hair away from nuclear war and ww3, again far worse then we were under trump...its still trumps fault? when exactly is it bidens fault? im guessing if its negative....never.

swing and a miss? 🙄 because i want to know why biden made false promises on being better then trump that you also promote all over the board yet, has us in the position of mutual destruction, collapse of the petro dollar and our enemies uniting? and you want ME to explain how he could have prevented it? lol. its always the same with you. but in the spirits of trying to keep this a message board for discussion off the top of my head. maybe he could have showed that the US has a shred of military competance under this administration. by you know, exiting a conflict responsably. not leaving millions in advanced equipment, stranding allies, killing troops, bombing innocent civilians in "retaliation" and caught lying about it immediately as his first military operation....for starters. that might have helped. your turn?

no you explain it. he ran on alot of promises that he was better so why is he not accountable when it was false.