Buffarukus

in a state that in no way would lose any abortion rights attacking people that have nothing to do with a decision. makes total sense. are stores that sell condoms and birth control next? they been stopping abortions for years. 🤔

it seems to go both ways as with all things political. the left seems ok with ending life before it begins but fighting to defend it when that life was used to destroy others (death penalty). of coarse we get the exact flip of the coin on the right. saving a mothers life aside which is not really in debate anyways. which seems more worthy to defend? a unborn child or a convicted felon? just strange how even hypocracy on how "precious" life is can be changed quickly when looked through a political lens. im personally ok with both. women can choose but so can a court if someone uses their life to cause nothing but pain and destruction on others...both should be concidered extreme and serious.

good find. your right that cultist is insane! what is she even talking about? could you imagine if instead of just being ramblings of a random person the entire republican party decided that this nonsense was true? no factual basis required. just one day decided jackie O was alive and everyone better start looking or else. that be really idiotic. who would support that insanity? oh, by the way, could you please tweet back ron that "women" do not exist and are nothing more then a social construct. gender is fluid. his ignorant labeling creates trauma. if he doesnt use the government appoved (birthing person) in his tweets i will have no choice but to protest his employer. i cant stand bigots like him!! also around last week our president decided the first amendment no longer covers misinformation he is helping spread. dhs has been notified. i can't stand radicals like him! tib, you just spread it too! i guess ill let you off with a warning cause you seem like a decent non birthing entity. what were we talking about again? oh yeah those insane trumpers and the cult they are in. 🤪

there ya go. so far left they push another common sense liberal who is on the team to the right. the flock just keeps getting smaller. when all is said and done who will bring home the wokey award by being the one TRUE victim? keep us updated.

head scratcher simply because i think they really like his effort and locker room leadership but i dont think you pick a guy that has no shot to compete for a start this early. hes slated to be in a role you just extended a very good starter? so a STmer that may replace milano way down the road or maybe milano at mlb if Edmunds leaves? we have had issues with titans, ne, Indianapolis, big physical run teams, just as much as a fast twitch kc team. a cb that has tackling issues and a undersized lb has me worried we may be leaning to far in the speed direction. glad the dl looks to be much better so maybe thats the reason. or maybe they have a exotic nickel type package or two so the kid has at least a chance to get on the field.

ehh i been hearing section 230 alot and its pretty convienent to have that seriously brought up only now, trump did have his chance as well mind you but i think as for platform rules the free market will decide if elons changes are a success for most changes implemented. seeing as offering free speach will be "unique" for a established platform. sorry but i don't want this administration touching something along the lines of what's "misinformation" in a law. im sure both sides would love to convien to bring society back to the days of 3 tv stations of certified gov approved info as controlling the narrative has spiraled out of their control...more so one side. but i would support common sense changes like doxxing having harsh penalties and death threats and such. as of now these things seem to not even be taken seriously and people do them pretty freely without any regard to a punishment.

it would just be nice to see a platform adhere to a straight forward set of common sense rules and implement them evenly. i hope this isnt about "allowing" a type of extremism, what your calling far right but instead ALSO removing the other side of extremism that has become normalized simply by the platform and corp media ignoring.

musk is looking at this thread licking his lips. this is prob 100 grand in cut and paste revenue from a single user alone. bad side is he says he will try cleaning up the bots so you may suddenly vanish. either way 😏 good stuff ahead. 👍

holy crap. the dems arent playin around. that campaign is going to be brutal. rich and poor arent the same, the less you make the more skin in the game. ohhh man its catchy too. how bout this democrats 2022 this party has got it locked down! oh thats good. what on earth can republicans hit them back with? nothin! thats what! little nitpicking chumps dont have a thing, right billstime. the social work interns have reimagined these streets into peace festivals. people losing all this weight from jogging for their lives everywhere in the city. avoiding needless expensive crap like food and shelter. never been better! can't wait for the blue monsooooooon!!!!

no i definitely do not read what you post but you say you read the bill? so you just cut and paste lies on what it can enforce for what...propaganda? then switch to "what it really means" lol do leftists ever dm you asking you to stop making them look bad? anyways happy easter billstime. hope you have a good one. take a day off from defending groomers and enjoy the family..bro. 🐰

cut and paste opinion from a twitter thread to give billstime a perspective for him!? shocking! impressive research as usual. lets see..... mathew chapman a program developer "on the spectrum" is the new cult leader for billstime or is dreamweasel? whenever you want to cut and paste from the actual bill that "conversations on the existence of families with two moms and dads is illegal". so many members have gone through this bs with you repeatedly. how bout just this one time. you actually read the bill and back up what nonsense twitter oops i mean you say. its more reading then twitter but no memes to distract you. so on the pdf its page 4 #3 that most closely resembles the lie your trying to tell. ill hold my breath waiting on any new information.

by the way you argue topics it no wonder why you are so desperate to push rhetoric on little kids, cause you show no signs of being able to defend it to a adults. bro.

from what i read and its alot of longform law talk. its basically says you must notify parents of any mental or physical behavioral issues that are noticed in children. something one would think is standard and unnecessary. guess not because not only is it not standard but people..actively fight against it!? the big one is teachers cannot enact a curriculum where sex or gender identity is taught in k through 3. a curriculum as in a topic or class taught. nothing to do with answering a child's questions in class or independently, they just cant construct a curriculum on it. i would think this would also be standard for a school to inform parents if a child is bringing up certain adult topics and a parent should be aware of that curiosity and handle it in the best way THEY see fit. if there's anything that seems out of line or transphobic..its not in there as its been pointed out the "dont say gay" bill doesn't say anything about gay at all. media and leftists decided teachers should have the ability to. 1) keep parents in the dark about any issues kids may have which can include something such as gender dysphoria as a example, thats not in the bill. so what about depression? what about showing signs of ADHD ect ect. if a teacher sees signs of a disorder what in the world makes people think this info should not be informed to the parent and that schools can unilaterally become aware or worse treat a condition without parental consent? 2) parents should not be aware of specific topics being taught in class and k through 3 is a good time to teach kids adult topics in a age range they still believe fat men fly with reindeer and giant bunnies give them candy. again what exactly are people fighting against here besides a republican put it out so i need to fight against it.

this entire thread you look really desperate to want adult strangers to talk to young children about sexuality without the parents knowing. the bill is for ANY sexuality, gay, straight..any! they are fng children man. that's it! media says its for gay only and you all blindly rush towards that virtue signal to blindly follow their bs rhetoric. but its not a cult. biology and teaching about sex ed, trans, gay whatever can come later when they are older in school or at any time by the parent. no law against that. the hell is wrong with you people? you ask when do people know when they are straight, who cares! the question is when is it appropriate to teach sex ed!? so twist it into anything you need to try and live with that fact. bring up criminals doing criminal things to just use as a talking point as if they even relate to the topic of the lefts infatuation with young children. seeing the left and yourself desperately NEEDING to do this is as sick as it gets. get ahold of yourself and read the bill. if you oppose it, seriously stay away from kids cause there is something very wrong with you. no joke.

what law would you like used to stop the mass migration of millions of illegal immigrants into this country? because thats all this is about. conservatives simply want laws to be upheld, any law that will contain the crisis that has been going on since biden stepped into office will do. no fed authoritarian over reach needed. title 42 is just a placeholder that is completely in line with what democrats have been happy to enforce on its own citizens for a very long time. regardless of these facts and studies that they miraculously now want to stop censoring and ignoring. funny how that happens when its a issue they seem to care about. just another hipocracy shown as the ( all clear ) signal is turned on. all clear to enter, as our young children are still being forced into masks all day. all clear as our countrys own citizens who had natural immunity are still looking for work after being fired...ect. ect. ect. ect. the data on what restrictions were necessary was made by simply comparing florida to california. no significant differences saving lives. clear data quite awhile before your jan/dec (of this year!??) assessment. so again, what law can republicans use to stop the onslaught of illegal immigration? as the dollar continues to lose its value. as our president warns us to prepare for the upcoming food shortages. oh! and a war going on with plenty of enemies out there that would love nothing more then to infiltrate a weak point and destroy us. saftey was REALLY important to the dems just a second ago. so whenever joe wants to pick a law im sure conservatives will agree with it and be more then happy to end any title 42 talk. just as long as it actually gets enforced.

supremists infiltrated? hmmm never thought of that. i was wondering why the democrats set up funds to bail out the rioters and refused federal support to stop them. makes sense now. 👍

i doubt it. more like how to make a beer can into a crack pipe and alot of financial info on big guys but since you bring it up. the lefts position was to burn it all to the ground for awhile there. when the right joins in you get all pearl clutchy about preserving buiildings and demanding justice? what changed? was it the innocent civilians and buisnesses? the right didnt attack enough of em before going for the federal building?

wait, what? ignore? lol a full impeachment trial and over a year of investigations using every federal resources with full media coverage every step of the way. the entire corporate press machine colluding with the federal goverment to coverup for over a year easily convincing idiots theres nothing to see here. these are the two things you comparing when it comes to ignoring? your not a serious person. november is coming and that labtop is going to be a real problem for you, the crackhead and grandpa. tick. tick. tick.

its good to do what your doing as your right. as long as it is on topic, in most cases i see it is. you also use the post as a tool to redirect things back on track instead of what others do..try their best to derail a thread they don't like the discussions on or let it devolve into pages of arguments and whatabouts..which we are all guilty of at some level i guess. at the same time. i think that you should at least add a touch of personal thought and context as well though. adding information not easily found is fine but what is it about that information that you feel is important? do we auto assume when you post a story info that you agree with everything it is saying every time?

cut and pasting twits that are pure satire again? let me get this straight. the woman who left Libya a complete cesspool. that has given rise to slavery! today! a slave trade is going on right now over there because of her. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/11/27/clinton-ponders-2020-run-lets-not-forget-her-real-libya-scandal-glenn-reynolds-column/895853001/ thats the woman we should listen to who "warned" us about a WAR VET. who..went on television show? whew! good thing biden got in or who knows what russia would be up to now adays.

kind of helps when the president doesn't announce his leniency. states don't announce that they will take any and all no questions asked, administration doesnt purposefully villianize/ penalize boarder patrol that are doing their job off of one propaganda photo that even the photographer immediately said was a lie. on and on. anything rep said or did to prevent this situation was called the same old racist, supremist, blah blah this is on purpose and it is 100% democrat run crisis they want. which is why they gaslit everyone to normalize it over the years as preparation.

i never thought a man could afford a closet full of scarfs to wear in warm weather or 10 dollar a cup "coffee" addiction either. all things seem possible through liberalism.

i dont really write out those points to change anyones mind on here. most people are firmly implanted and wont budge even when confronted with logic and reason regardless. i argue with [ billstime ] afterall. but there are lurkers, there are people unsure, and hopefully maybe a few read what i say and look alittle deeper. prob wasting my time like you suggest but its not hurting me to put it out there.