Figster

You started a thread on dual threat QB's and went on to show QB's leading the teams in rushing. How do you expect this to be interpreted If you don't mind my asking? As mobile? Tom Brady is a master at QB sneaks. Do you consider Brady a dual threat?

If you don't distinguish the difference between mobile and dual threat you need a bigger list. Myself personally, as another posted earlier the better a QB can throwthe ball the less he runs. Or needs to run IMO. (Qcity) By your definition all QB's are a dual threat including the GOAT, Tom Brady.

I consider dual threat a QB/ player used frequently in the O with called runs IMO. Mobile on the other hand like Mahomes is someone who is clearly going to beat the crap out of you passing the football.

On a side note I kinda liked the flow of the game without all the excessive crowd noise. Being able to hear all the natural sounds of football more clearly. The hard hits sounded louder. Reminded me of how well you can hear the sounds of a hockey game / players. I'm not hating it...

Given the missed TD its a reasonable assessment. B+ for breaking the 300 mark and giving Diggs a good opening day workout. Something special is brewing in Buffalo I Billieve...

Josh Allen can put the ball anywhere on the field on any given play with plenty of play makers to help him. Myself personally, a little less of Allen running the football is a healthy way to remedy the problem.

Aside from the Allen fumbles its hard not to come away from the game without being very pleased with the performance of Josh Allen. Diggs fits the Bill. Who needs preseason games This is one tough Buffalo Bills football team. MERCY!!!

The US has never had anything close to what I would consider to be a full nationwide lockdown IMO. I agree, its been the worst of all worlds here in the United States Perhaps the Divided States would be more appropriate...

You have to get the job done in a united shutdown. Not 50% of the outbreak. Not 75% of the outbreak. All of it. Or as close to all of it as you can get IMO. Until the virus becomes more then just manageable. You finished the job when the virus becomes the hunted. Everyone seems to think the country's businesses running at a quarter to half capacity. Empty stadiums, schools half empty, our whole economy crippled for month after month as some of our oldest and wisest citizens continue to fall prey to Covid 19. Everyone seems to think this is better then a 30 to 45 day united lockdown. Its not, not in my humble opinion. The US never got the job done right to begin with IMO.

I agree, From a continuity standpoint on O the main core of Bills players excluding Diggs already has a good understanding of the Daboll Offense IMO. I'm also confident that McD is preaching play smart. Stay focused. Protect the football. Taking a more conservative approach to start the season would be the smart thing to do IMO. If Buffalo runs up the score against the Jets it will probably have more to do with the Bills running game then anything IMO. Still, the ball can bounce many ways. No twelth man to help turn the tide. I'm cautiously optimistic...

My thoughts also...

I needed this ROCKPILE REVIEW. It just didn't feel like the season was about to start until now. Thank you

Well said, Greg Roman has found the perfect fit with Lamar Jackson IMO. Elte RB that can throw the football. The Roman > Daboll analogy is probably true in Baltimore.

Whats getting to me is the amount of division that continues to build in our country at the worst possible time.

T Mobile says hello...

Do you honestly think someone is going to wave a magic wand here in the USA and gain compliance? You will never get everyone to wear a mask, or to stop the partying, or the low participation in contact tracing. To many freedoms. To many people worried more about their own privacy, about their own personal wants and needs, and its not going to change. Our younger generation will continue to rebel as some of our oldest and wisest citizens continue to fall prey to the pandemic. Sigh So while I agree, a united response with everyone on board could work and already has in other countries. It won't work here in my humble opinion. The candid discussion is much appreciated, Thanks

Asymptomatic people are brought into the discusssion to side step what the CDC recommendation change was really about and to make a political party look incompetent IMO. I explained to you how people who don't show symptoms could be quarantined without creating a back log. Allowing the people who are showing symptoms a quicker response on test results so a contact tracer can get control of the outbreak before it spreads to 100's even thousands of people. The guideline change prevents hundreds of thousands of people who don't have Covid 19 from being tested so sick people and the ones they've already come into contact with can be notified quicker.

Cellophane flowers of yellow and green towering over your head look for the girl with the sun in her eyes and she's gone. Lucy in the sky with diamonds Lucy in the sky with diamonds Lucy in the sky with diamonds.

What do you think the CDC was expecting you to do when they inform you that you have been in close contact with a Covid 19 carrier? Hello, we think you might have Covid 19, but carry on with your normal daily routine as you get tested and wait for test results? Seriously? Meanwhile you create a back log slowing down the whole testing process when we have actual sick people waiting to get results back. How does your employer or fellow workers feel about the situation? Do you think they want to work with someone waiting on test results? Talk about disrupting a work place. I'm not sure why testing or not testing asymptomatic carriers keeps entering into the discussion. Well, we did all get together ( party up ) to play in the Warzone...( C O D )

If you look back on my posts I made the same point earlier. We have been testing the wrong people is the point that I'm trying to make. It wouldn't surprise me If other states are worse. Or better, depending on ones perspective I suppose. I think testing data/ totals is a reflection of the virus spread and the states ability or inability to control it IMO. Myself personally, I think I may have a better understanding now on why our president thinks we are testing to many people. The Trump administration is trying to correct the problem IMO. Thanks

Absolutely, everyone assuming they have the virus and a National shelter in place order is the only way we stop Covid 19 IMO. No argument there Dean. You guys make good points. Break the transmission chain when possible. Of course. Its something that can be accomplished through quarantine. Test when symptoms show. Its not that I think we should focus on the symptoms. Slowing down the testing process with people not showing symptoms is causing a delay for results in positive cases that do need to get tracked down IMO. I'm sure everyone must realize how important getting test results back in a timely manner would be when you are trying to get on top of the situation from a contact tracing standpoint. My nephew has been waiting for longer then a week now for Covid 19 test results. Fever, coughing, and yes, even sneezing, all gone before he gets confirmation. Myself personally, I can understand the kind of back log the CDC recommendations would be creating. The friction and non compliance you will face trying to get people who don't feel sick to get tested. I'm glad we made the change. Thanks for the discussion fellas...

We're not talking about people that have Covid 19 and don't show symptoms. We're talking about people who came into contact with a confirmed Covid 19 carrier for 15 minutes or longer. A big percentage of which never catch the virus. I also tend to disagree with someone who has Covid 19 without symptoms being the most dangerous. They don't sneeeze, they don't cough and If all the guidelines are followed. Social distancing, mask wearing, I'm not sure how from a general public standpoint it makes them any more dangerous then your typical carrier displaying all the symptoms. With all due respect Dean

The scientific explanation is obvious IMO. No symptoms, then why test? You are asking thousands of people that don't feel sick to get tested. People are reluctant enough to get tested when they are sick. You can't force people to get tested. If you want to test people without symptoms wouldn't it make better sense to monitor people on the front lines serving our community? My home state of Pa by way of example has tested almost a million and a half citizens to find a little under 127,000 confirmed cases. Seems like an excessive amount of testing right? It works out to about 1 in every 12 people have tested positive. Its not the cold or flu season. Covid 19 symptoms are fairly obvious. So why did we have so many people testing negative for Covid 19? Testing people without symptoms was not helping the situation IMO.

I am, I am, I amI said I wanna get next to youI said I'm gonna get close to youYou wouldn't want me have to hurt you tooHurt you too!

2018 and 2019 for the same reason eball Josh Allen...