DaBillsFanSince1973

chances are he doesn't see OC # 3 in buffalo? edit: OC # 4, my bad.

superbowl?

they should be set for a decade or more. hopefully, maybe not as large a contract but hopefully the bills land their guy this off season? boomers 49ers/bills sb may come to fruition after all?

hats as well, don't forget the hats.

honest mistake on his behalf I'm sure.

well, they both go hand in hand but he might be a little delusional since he is not the most accurate to begin with.

the thread title is very misleading considering whom it's speaking of.

fake news isn't that the motto these dayz...

absolutely NOT!! unless it had shrooms growing out of it...;)

nice, I mean the ring too

so what's the consensus? is he feeling alright?

I felt the eagles had a chance but have to admit when I checked nfl.com this morning and saw that foles was sb mvp I was relieved to know the brady bunch lost! that is awesome. funny how karma can come back and bite you square in the ass!

why be a dick about it? I just simply said make it CLEAR your thread is a pay source article? simple, not asking much and would save from clicking on it in the first place. I clicked on it yesterday and saw it was bn pay source. moved on I wont go any further as I don't see the need to get worked up over asking a simple question to someone that seems irked about said question.

simple solution: thread title: Buffalo News Article - Tyrod Taylor on goal line pass in Jacksonville *Must Subscribe to Read Article*

this

he's a good kid, real talent. hope he's around for a spell

you think maybe he was referring to those few who are (posting) vocal about keeping him? that would be my guess.

drum solo guitar solo(s)

you can speak of others on that but long before the subscription fee ever came to be I had nothing to do with the bn. just a matter of freedom of choice and I chose not to read certain sources out there, bn being one of them. as for them getting better, that may be from a personal stand point and I wont doubt your judgement on that. who knows down the road they may gain my interest as it had nothing to do with the little chump change they ask for and everything to do with poor reporting, imo.

I never complained about said fee personally yet think of the bn as a not so great source, so I wouldn't subscribe to begin with. if you want to pay, read and praise bn that's your prerogative. meanwhile why the need to call some out as angry or resentful saying they need to get a grip was my initial complaint about your post but maybe you felt the need to do so. no one should be expecting anything to be free and I agree that they have to pay employees some chump change for their work, no problem there. I just think if you're going to share anything from a pay source, make it clear in the thread title "bn article, must subscribe and pay a fee to read" and that may save from the backlash in the future?

yeah, they should be more like you and pay for the "excellent piece" instead of making the choice not to while sharing criticism as to why they choose not to pay a practically free fee of $2.99 a month. did you ever think that it has nothing to do with being self righteous and everything to do with choice? you seem like the self righteous one here.

uh, okay