Jump to content

TPS

Community Member
  • Posts

    7,747
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TPS

  1. Thanks. I'm sure Beane (and McD) know, so we'll see if they go after him. Personally, it would be great to get an upgrade then move Ford to G.
  2. It wasn't their grade that worried me, rather it stated he gave up 12 sacks. If that is true, that is worrisome...
  3. I was for going after him until I saw this ... https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/daryl-williams/9535
  4. Yeah, Oliver's play is the reason I no longer think they should sign Phillips, unless he came cheap, which he won't. Oliver needs to get 60-70% of the defensive snaps next year at 3T. Find a cheap vet or draft someone to back him up. Let that dog loose next year!
  5. Yes, yes, it isn't Q ....and doesn't fit the narrative of Trump's 3D maneuverings....
  6. I would think the way Bills Mafia travels and kicks up sales in other markets is another reason...?
  7. Naw, most libertarians have integrity and consistency in their views, and most importantly adhere to the constitution....
  8. Former Reaganism David Stockman’s take... https://www.unz.com/article/the-donalds-assassination-of-general-soleimani-as-stupid-as-it-gets/
  9. Doesn't sound like Trump sent the A Team to congress...
  10. Definitely option 2. I was in favor of signing both Shaq and Phillips, but I'm now leaning toward Shaq only. Shaq has outperformed Trent, who is over-paid for his production. Also, his clueless play against the Titans, collapsing in on a fake, was not the first time he's done that. Go with Shaq and Daryl Johnson at LDE, and Jerry/Yannick at RDE. Hughes played 64% of snaps this year, and it's most likely time for him to throttle down to 50%. As for Phillips, 2020 is the year of the horse, Ed Oliver. Get him over 60% of the snaps, then both add a 3-tech vet and draft someone.
  11. I have a narrower view of the deep state, somewhere stated in the first 10 pages...and it's a narrative that hasn't changed.
  12. Didn't you read the first 300 pages of this thread?
  13. Agree mostly. A couple corrections. Harrison is the back up to Star, so they’d need someone to back up Ed if JPhillips goes, and it sounded to me like he won’t be back. I think you mean Daryl Johnson, the DE. If they bring Shaw back, then Trent is most likely gone, especially if they like Daryl.
  14. Hopefully Sweeney will have a bigger role next year. He's one of those guys that seems to know how to get open.
  15. Because they're idiots...
  16. And Iraq had WMDs.... Administrations will say whatever is necessary to justify the endless wars. This suggests to me @Deranged Rhino that the Deep State has won. The plan all along was to take down those countries that are simultaneously enemies of Israel and not under the thumb of US influence. Trump is no different than his predecessors in this respect....
  17. Rand Paul has a good take on things... https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/01/06/rand-paul-iran-trump-bolton-vpx.cnn
  18. Thanks. It took Oliver 4-5 seconds to get him up, too! I don’t believe they scored on that TO too.
  19. That happened on the scrum out of bounds, which occurred because Edmunds waited so long to get up. Had he got up quickly and ran, there was a lot of daylight. Not a criticism, more a what if...
  20. There were 3 blockers who could’ve taken that guy and sprung Allen for another long gain. I thought we wanted josh to throw for 300 yards?
  21. Good assessment. It’s too bad they can’t find someone who is a beasely/McKenzie hybrid. As it is, they have too many one-trick WRs. Oh, btw, I got slammed for suggesting Roberts was a waste...
  22. You're creating a straw man argument. Most of what I've seen is people suggesting they needed a bigger target as an option, especially with Foster's lack of production. From my perspective, he produced significantly more than I expected as the fourth WR, and he gave them the opportunity to actually make that type of throw to the end zone.
  23. What most of us have been suggesting, given the roster, he is a better option than Foster. You suggested playing "Duke "didn't work." It's clear that he gave the Bills passing game more than Foster has all season. So what makes you say it didn't work, one play?
  24. So you're saying they would've won had Foster played instead of Duke? Easy to criticize, but what would you have done?
  25. No blame here, but it sure looked like Edmunds could've taken that fumble a long way. Oliver was trying to get him up, and he finally did but too late. Would like to see a wide view of that play.
×
×
  • Create New...