Jump to content

BillsShredder83

Community Member
  • Posts

    5,537
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BillsShredder83

  1. I mean this isn't boxing and neither is Jacina Paul
  2. Well when you involve gambling, yes. It's fraud at the highest level possible. You'd think with gambling going mainstream right now that officials would be under intense scrutiny with no room for error, for the exact scenario above. I have no clue how this is happening.
  3. Man if you can find it go back and check out that Chandler fight, brawl for the ages Was 15mins of this!
  4. Dangggg my girl was saying I bet she'd be adorable with hair and sure enough. Covington really put up the fight of his life. Best I've ever seen him look. He gets wrote off by alot of people for that persona but he's very talented and was tough as nails. The persona is exactly that... if you wanna get paid, as a businessman, you have to have some WWE in your vains, it's silly and makes me laugh, but get the feeling he's actually a humble guy, with a good business approach. He called out Masdival right after, I'd love to see that fight! I'll come back and start threads a few days before the next fight so we can all talk about the fights!
  5. Anybody watching? Michael Chandler v Justin gaithje is one of the craziest fights I've seen in a long time. Opening fight, hopefully to a killer night!
  6. This was in response to him saying "I'd rather lose without him, than win with him". I just needed to point out he's not oj, ray Lewis, Rae Carruth, tyreek Hill. Or Ray Rice. Those are the types of players you make that comment about.... in the theoretical scenario I responded to, I'm not willing to lose, so that we don't have a dbag on the team.
  7. Well it's pretty dumb... we've done plenty of losing so, maybe we can win. I'm not saying he would make us win, that's up for debate, and I have no clue I'd hed help or hurt.... but if beane likes it I'm on board. Dudes a diva but you saying you'd rather lose without, than win with makes zero sense. He didn't rape or kill anyone. He's not hitting women or breaking his kids arm.... soooo this take makes no sense.
  8. Maybe cause we're contenders. That or the sports books know about a WR we were going after at the deadline maybe?
  9. Got CC:d in an email? 😆😆😆
  10. If the Saints were my team at this point I'd welcome the rebuild. Brees nor Rivers are more than a very short term stop gap. They played the heck outta - kick the can down the road, and have done it well. Time to bottom out, live a year in dead cap hell, and hopefully get some nice picks to re stock the cupboard.
  11. I dunno a whole lot about Laurent D-T, but im cheering for him. Class act big time
  12. Must be a family thing, cause it appears his wife does too
  13. we doing the joke thing here still errrrr?
  14. is this a real question? not only 1st rd pick, but elite speed like that YES. 32 teams will have files with their own information on him, not one single team wouldnt... and if they dont, its because they believe the hip injury to be career ending
  15. Henry Ruggs avail now? Hes got that killer instinct
  16. always liked that "stat" when he was drafted.... their GM at the time said a team reached out about a trade that same day LOL there arent a lot of trades in the NFL, but that goes to tell you how much these guys call around to try and make them happen
  17. can you dumb this down further? im having a hard time interpreting
  18. And here I thought I punched in to work F5!!!
  19. No Rodgers rate being negotiated on that trade!
  20. well theres a reason these trades are rare.... coming in mid season in NFL isnt exactly like trading for a superstar in NBA/NHL, so if we dont pull the trigger thats a huge reason why, not cause Beane is timid thats for sure
  21. If we're going obscure I'm going Vaclav Verada lol it's my guess and nobody can tell me what to guess
  22. I'm shocked anyone's saying classless. I don't care how much times left, if you're within 2 scores, you do what you can to make it atleast 3. Nobody wants to be the answer to that trivia question, plus tie breakers. Even without that we had a rough loss last week, and a rough start to this game... you gotta chance to get the offenses juices flowing you gotta let them eat
  23. I wish Gesecki was a possibility. In division trades do happen but I can't see MIA s front office doing it right now. Trading him would be bad enough PR, but making a team like us better would really be a nail in the coffin on their jobs. Gesecki n Knox would be a stud 1-2 lineup
  24. Weird. I thought he was having a pretty solid year. Proli just from catching highlights I know I've seen him catch 2 Homerun tds. Must be that's about all of it
×
×
  • Create New...