4merper4mer

The "good" news is that once everyone is canceled then no one will be canceled.

Ok, but is it Tom Brady? If not, judging by the clothes I'll say Angus Young.

Whoa. Somebody's not a fan of Greeley.

Interesting that as time has gone by and more is dicovered that theories about the number of alien civilizations has dropped from very large numbers to.....36. More interesting yet is that this number is derived from favorable assumptions where preceding favorable assumptions have been disproven. Now 36 is an optimistic number where thousands upon thousands used to be the optimistic view. Do we detect a trend? 10,000 ----------> 36 ---------> ? I think I see where this is leading. Side note: Even at a low number like 36 sitcom math still holds sway. The number is zero guys. Somewhere Von Neumann and Fermi are laughing it up at Drake.

The initial part of your post, although possible, is speculation, not established fact. Botts more than earned his firing on hockey alone. His tenure included zero developed players. None. Maybe Goaloffson. He also oversaw regression of several. I take no joy in his firing and it was abrupt based on recent statements. With that said, the departure of Pilut was also abrupt and there is no excuse for it happening. I'm not saying you're wrong, but it is possible that you are. The new GM cannot possibly be worse than the last two. If he drives to the arena tomorrow, pours accelerants thruoughout and lights it on fire he will have caught up with Murray and Botts. He has a difficult task with the empty roster Botts has left behind and what will certainly be a strange season for all post COVID. Keep Eichel in the fold, get through 20-21 alive and go from there. If Botts stayed it would be no better than that and probably worse.

Maybe he could levitate like David Blaine with one knee bent and the other leg straight. Everyone happy?

I heard his mom is Jewish and when he woke up he said Oy Vey never have I had such a splitting headache. I'm not saying I KNOW he was doing something with his phone but I saw enough where it easy to believe the police could be suspicious. Stop it. If they turned him around and cuffed him people would be whining they should have just moved him out of the way.

FYI to all John is butt hurt because I don't love Jason Botterill. On the first officer I can see that but it looked more like shoulder than face. On the second officer he was waving it around by the guys hip.

Do you concur that he was waving his phone toward the police in a fashion similar to the way Dr. McCoy waved his magic medical device on Star Trek? What might be the purpose of this. What I've read is that the devices can pick up frequencies being used by the police devices so they can be jammed by other means. This makes sense to me but I'm not an EE. What doesn't make sense is waving the phone around toward specific areas of the cops gear for no reason at all. Apparently that makes sense to you.

@Joe in Winslow could have told this lady burning down the Wendy's not to mess with a red head chick.

The thumbs up I gave does not apply to your sarcastic first paragraph.

You listed one reason: Rampant ignorance. Perhaps you should have said "rampant ignorance is the largest reason but there might be others which are valid". Admit it and move on. Of course that would require you thinking there are valid reasons to vote no. Do you?

He asked "why". You answered "rampant ignorance".

Could it be that your keyboard had all of the necessary keys to explain that the first time but you decided to cite ignorance alone? Could it be that the above is a CYA? Could it be that my post you disliked so much said almost the same thing about there being no need to reduce positions black and white logic? I'm disappointed because at first I thought you could tell me what to think and now it just looks like you're full of crap.

If it walks like a proclamation and it quacks like a proclamation...

I just can't wrap my incapable and ignorant mind why you proclaimed anyone who voted in a way different from you as ignorant. Please please help.

All I asked is that you tell me what to think because you proclaimed me ignorant and incapable. Please teach my why everyone should vote the same way on this poll. As a bonus please explain why demanding everyone have the same opinion isn't an example of groupthink. I don't get that either. Please please oh great one.

Josh said nothing about Vikings fans. Not one word.

Blah blah blah. Your argument is about soccer while my post was about the lame MLS. Sherlock's jai alai comment gets it. Not enough people care about the MLS for its inclusion to be anything other than a veiled ESPN promo.

I wish my mind were capable enough to agree with everything the great and glorious Capco thinks. If only everyone were just like you. Here is how I currently feel: I would neither support nor withhold support for whatever action McD or anyone else takes. I am not aghast that people would vote either way on such a narrowly worded poll question on a football website. I do not pretend to know the opinions each of them hold which resulted in their vote. Even if I understood all of a person's reasons and disagreed 100% I would support their right to express their view. Supporting their right is not the same thing as supporting their action or inaction. To to me the anthem represents the ideals of our country. Personally, I would never kneel or turn my back to it because I believe in those ideals. Do we ever fail to live up to those ideals? Yes we do. That is also true of every other country, indeed every other individual in the history of mankind. So if you're kneeling due to failure to live up to our ideals, you will always kneel. That's fine. Your choice. If you pick and choose some ideals or a threshold of how much we missed by.....also your choice. If someone does not believe in our ideals at all, then they they should take whatever action they deem fit with respect to kneeling, protest, whatever. They have that right. If they want to kneel because they feel our ideals haven't been met I think that is also fine but I find it inconsistent. If they want to kneel because they got shorted on pepperoni on the pizza they ordered....also fine.....even more inconsistent. I do not support or withhold support for any decision anyone makes in this latest go round on the topic....or any go round. It is not my place. I think it is highly presumptuous of someone to express shock that someone gave or withheld support and demand everyone feel the way they feel. I would not get on my high horse and deem either group ignorant as you have chosen to do because of your perceived superior intellect. Because of my incapable mind I am clearly wrong. Please teach me oh great one.

Cuts both ways. Cuts every which way actually.

Lefties have always liked unions and tenures so really don't have any business complaining about the pensions. The firing of the BPD officer is a different issue than the pensions.

He's changed from a drowned out commie voice in the wilderness to a loud commie voice able to take advantage of a group about which he doesn't really care.

If they let the MLS guy in I will get a chuckle out of it.

I have pulled many hamstrings but never my own.