4merper4mer

The first four words of your post were egregiously incorrect and did exactly what you accused me of doing. I hadn't shown malice toward anyone.

Who defines the need of an individual?

I read four words. My response: I have no hostilities towards others. None. Zero. I do have hostility toward bad ideas. I've shown hostility only toward ideas. I haven't judged you or the other folks with the bad ideas. Only the ideas. You've decided to take the opposite approach. Whatever. I'm guessing the rest of your post is based off this false premise. If so it is worthless. I'll read it now but probably won't comment.

From each....to each...ring any bells?

Red hair ring. The leaders of many parts of this current turmoil are avowed Marxists. Who is against a just society where people are equal?. Those are pillars of our founding. Being against collectivism does not mean one is against justice. I am against communists/socialists/anarchists/collectivists seizing the exclusive license to define injustice and develop solutions. That road leads to millions of dead and subservient paupers as survivors. It always has. No thanks.

How many of our freedoms have come from proletariat revolutions? What at I find absolutely hysterically funny is that you appear to espouse freedom in your first paragraph. It only took you until the third to let your true feelings about individualism be known. So we should be collectively free? How does that work? Your desired form of government doesn't work and it won't start working just because you think you're smarter than everyone else.

You could write 1000 more pages of this, you can quote the Beatles and Woody Guthrie and any number of bearded academics you'd like and collectivism still won't work.

Laughter = violence? Got it.

You've confused mockery and hatred.

He expects Utopia.

Ok great. If we're guessing the short kid now, my guess is: James Earl Jones little brother.

So definitely not the short kid in the middle?

Sucked. When you're best jokes are about Blake Bortles, you suck.

The anti baseball crowd has been at this for 40+ years and they're batting 0-40+.

Well you're both wrong about that show. It pretty much sucked. Three average jokes in the beginning and repeated ad infinitum from then on.

If Trump wins again these guys are more than capable of kicking the can down the road for four more years.

Unless they're commies, they have to go.

Gump's growth of a long beard was a clear case of cultural appropriation from Muslims. Elroy Jetson

I just read that now Eskimo Pies are having their name changed because the name is offensive. I thought it might be fun to have a game around this. For or the first post I'll name something. The next poster should list a way to be offended by this so it can be canceled and then list something new for the next poster to be offended. You can make the offending matter easy or difficult to find. Your choice. You can list from any category : product, person, place, song, movie, whatever. Example: Cathedral ceilings. These should be banned because they remind people of oppressive religions. The initial entry: Liquid Plumber

That rule helped Monday Night Football.

On the left from our perspective or from their perspective?

I'll watch later but I'm guessing he was talking about Canadians. Unless he used the word intelligent.

Not a fan. She said we'd meet again some sunny day but she was a liar.

No. He means by being awarded the Nobel Peace prize on Jan 21

He said Trump was "apart". I think that is correct but Occum's Shaver thinks he meant "a part" which is different.