4merper4mer

Nice theory. Knox getting dumped too? Davis? Bass? Elam?

Make up call DPI would be the right thing to do.

All signs point to yes.

Uncalled for name calling. I disagree with people here but it is not personal.

If one side of a discussion takes hundreds of factors into account and another takes 6 or 7 and purposely ignores contradicting info, one is superior. Superior does not mean perfect…but still superior.

Actual math > Sitcom math

That was true, but we put on some glasses and we see better now. Unfortunately, the speed of light is still a thing so I blame the photons. Dude, if you don’t understand why the observable universe is the observable universe, then we are at a standstill. It’s called the observable universe for a very good reason. It isn’t called the permanently observable universe, but it would be difficult to find a scientist that thinks the condition is temporary. On a side note, I’m wondering if I should interpret your fixation on the unobservable universe as a capitulation that math has indeed shown the observable universe to be devoid of intelligent life outside of Earth. Please do get back to me on that.

Do you understand WHY the observable universe is the observable universe?

Vegas not up to date on how incredibly horrible Beane’s drafts have been?

Unless something drastically changes in either physics or our ability to control it, I think it is reasonable to limit discussion/speculation to the observable universe. Agree?

Score more points then the other team does what? I can’t take the suspense.

I know the Bills can’t be in on him and I haven’t seen them play enough to have an opinion on whether he will earn the big contract he’ll get but i have seen enough to say he is faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar better than Clowney.

Ok list a team or two’s drafts from top to bottom…..not cherry picked and display Beane’s deficiencies. It ought to be easy for you. Also, where does “top flight” end? Top 10, 5, 3, only 1?

Especially in cheesy movies. Which provides a clue displaying that life does not exist elsewhere.

Do we know that decks of cards can be shuffled in different ways? Yup. Why? Because we’ve seen it. Do we know that proteins can fold in different ways? Yup for the same reason. It may or may not be random….impossible to tell because there are too many possibilities to count, but we do know there are an inconceivable amount of ways it CAN happen and that we’re only aware of one that fosters life. Obviously life is possible because it exists here. It is becoming inescapable that the odds of it happening on a given planet are 1/x where x is a number far far greater than the number of planets in the universe. That might not be the answer we’d hope for, but it is the answer.

No I’m not. He took a shot, it flopped. The potential payoff was big this year. The cost was sustainability moving forward. The point is that Beane’s mythological ineptitude at drafting is not the issue others will make it out to be. What cost us most was the failed Miller gamble. On what planet is a 10-7 record an indicator of a bad team….in any sport? If you’re going to claim the Ravens and Steelers are better at drafting than the Bills overall then make your case without cherry picking one or two guys. If your going to claim Beane is bad at drafting, repeat the excercise with at least 15 teams.

But we do know there are trillions upon trillions upon trillions of ways they can fold and yet only one of those formed life. You can twist as increasing the odds aliens exist but in fact, it makes it far far far less likely. Math.

We’re there any other players on the team drafted in the same year that might have taken precedence over Edmunds and altered the equation a bit? Why did you seem so definitive in your first post only to use phrases like “seems like” now?

This is what I’m talking about. Cherry picking things and calling them failures. He’s had some hits? You mean like 3 straight division titles? But the standard is now every third round pick has to be an immediate superstar? You’re not going to get every pick perfect and the guys you list are mostly still young. Miller was a calculated risk, but a risk nonetheless. Beane might do it again given the same circumstances. Heck, I might. But there is no denying that it created more holes than a perceived “miss” on Bernard.

My post was not to say it was a bad move or to say “I told you so” about Miller in any way. It was to say that the move for Miller came with a cost. That cost has created holes that need to be filled. There are people all over this board saying Beane has drafted poorly which is simply not true. Poorly would imply worse than at least 16 other teams. Has anyone even attempted to make that case? No. They cherry pick how we could have had DK Metclaf or other stupid anecdotal stuff. The Miller move could have resulted in a Super Bowl championship this weekend. It didn’t. It resulted in a video with stuff burning, a bunch of roster holes, and an injury. Now, if Beane doesn’t fill all of those holes it will just “prove” that he is bad at drafting to some here. That’s dumb.

Anyone ever read about how 52 factorial is such a big number that it’s likely that no two card deck shuffles in history have resulted in the same sequence of cards? It’s fascinating and interesting and a fun read if you have the time. Its also “amateur” when compared to the topic below. But, but but….there are more stars than grains of sand. More math:

He made a really good play and helped us win a big game. Was that worth the cost to you? If so, congrats, you win. Well that’s a difficult question and pretty complex. What it doesn’t contain is an expectation to get hall of famers with every pick or be able to pick guys at 27 that were actually drafted at 4. It also doesn’t include expectations that all players we pass over will become abject failures.

1. How many players have been re-signed to their current team since the new cap number was announced? Why do you assume no extension by now is a data point that has any finality to it at all? 2. If you think Leighton Vander Doodle is a solution to anything, much less replacing Edmunds, I’m not sure what you’re somoking.

I don’t criticize the dice rolling, but the result was poor. It cost us Poyer, Edmunds and more. We received a burn down video as the season highlight, Out of the hundreds of players available AFTER our picks at DL, I’m sure you can cherry pick a few that have succeeded in the NFL thus far. That’s not a realistic way to criticize though.

Does 14 safeties on a list of 100 guys really constitute in an “abundance” that manifests itself in discounted salaries? I guess we’ll all find out. We likely need to get a safety somewhere and it is an important role on this defense. Having Hyde helps in 2023 but how much longer will he play? For the long term we really need to add more than one safety considering Johnson disappointed and Hamlin has obvious questions surrounding him. I’m all for finding our safety of the future in the 6th round, but finding a star at any position in the 6th works for me. I also take into consideration that our pick is not very high…..27 I think. I’m for whoever is the best combination of immediate impact and long term viability at any position. Is that more likely to come at some positions than others? I suppose. Personally, I don’t have a visceral documented hatred for any position group. If we ended up taking a guy that was the next Anthony Munoz at 27 I’d be elated. I’d also be thrilled if it were the next Ronnie Lott.