-
Posts
21,693 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by 4merper4mer
-
Even better than we were. JuJu is worthless.
-
It’s weird but why wouldn’t it be. There were reports earlier in the week that the Jets and Pack had already agreed on the compensation and that it was up to Rodgers. Now Rodgers says the opposite.
-
It doesn’t matter wrt Hooker. He will be gone by mid 2nd round. 4th is in no way realistic.
-
Cannot be.
-
He, like so many of his alumni, was a can’t miss prospect who has…….missed. Your false choice comparing him to subjective projections of first round receivers is silly at best. The Bills aren’t allowed to select another position? Have we gotten any good players at 27 in the past few years? Gilmore just went for a 5th today. Waller went for a third. But we should toss Denver our first for a guy that has done nothing? I’m fine with a 4th or something if we’re willing to take a flyer on him turning around his overhyped, underproducing career.
-
Jeudy has some intrigue to him but a first is absurd. He is due to be paid soon, hasn’t really produced….although that can be attributed to extenuating circumstances if one sees it that way……and for now is just another in a loooooooooooooooooooooong line of recent can’t miss Alabama receivers that have typically fallen somewhere between meh and murderer.
-
Garret Wilson too.
-
The other concern with Vander Doodle is that he suck’s badly.
-
My are posts what? Just kidding, I know it was a typo. The guy that called a rock an alien ship says there have been probes but they’re all hiding. And they are pooped out of a mother ship which is also hiding. Do I have that right? I suggested that you think about your response vis a vis Von Neumann probes, etc. but you didn’t. If you had, you’d realize that what is asserted about the characteristics of these probes does not follow basic logic. This is a very important step. I don’t think I have an emotional tone at all in these posts. My posts may elicit an emotional response from the wishful thinkers, but that is something entirely different. It’s not all that different from telling a pot head that marijuana has negative traits. Those responses are very similar. At this point are you ready to defend the study and state what you think is true and why, or do you need more?