HamSandwhich

Your point is well taken Shaw, but I’m not sure it’s 💯 correct. What you’re explaining is a pool of good to very good which a dime a dozen, wouldn’t that make the smallest increment of being better than the pack more impactful on the team? Well though out, thanks for your thoughts.

This is the year we win the Superbowl with an embarrassment of riches heading into 2025!

Wait till he said about our great white hope of a safety!

Hyde

Why did they use a college ball?

Most productive, Diggs Most sneaky good, Reich Most well liked, Fitzmagic wayyyy down here, Sammy Squakin’s

“Reality”- you use that term loosely.

I see a lot of idiots like yourself who act high and mighty and have no idea what's coming. It will be fun to watch you all melt.

Yeah, I’m having fun playing with this little guy. Not going to get much from me. Not worth the time and effort to engage with an interlocutor who has no interest in changing his own views.

Oh are you saying that democrats label things that don't actually describe what's inside? In other news, water is wet.

Funny that the first link is "Lawfare", a strategy that the Dems are using to bring frivoulous lawsuits against Trump on spurious legal theory. Basically means they bend the law to fit the narrative they want to achieve.

Who are the "real experts" you're talking about? MSNBC? Do you only trust the experts with answers to everything? i.e. you don't know what a woman is because you're not an expert?

They're filtered through a bent justice system.

I don’t expect you to understand the inside joke as you’re on the outside. I can tell you’re full of wisdom by your usage of “OMG” /sarcasm

Try not being such a douche. There are certainly hundreds of articles out there on this subject. I’m asking people specifically, who have been following this, if they’ve come across a fair representation of what happened without bias? Do you go to the robber that just robbed your house and ask them if they robbed your house and believe them when they say no? ESPN has the same reason to put this in a certain light, so they’re not exactly non-biased on this. I don’t blame them for that, just that they’re biased and I wanted a more neutral tone. So I asked the sleuths that have been following if they know of a good article. Some have responded appropriately, others are rude like yourself. Carry on

I did see that and if it’s accurate, seems skeevy at best. Plausibility is a value statement, what was his denial about it?

I was specifically asking because there is TOO MUCH out there and a lot of it has it's own opinions. So I was asking if anyone thought there was an article that was fair that I could review. Does that make sense? I'm primed not to just believe articles from places that were impacted by this scenario. Is that not fair? I would do that for any subject.

Look at this, a person who actually responded with an article I can look at, rather than just "rolling eyes" emoji. Simply just asking those who have been following this if they can help a person who is not well versed in this subject to provide an article that is fair to both sides. I'll take a look and see if this holds mustard, but I appreciate your offering this article.

Do anyone have a good article explaining what happened exactly here, that’s fair for each sides point of view? This one seems a bit biased and gives no idea as to Favres stance (I realize there have probably been articles ad nauseam). Question I have, was this willfully accepting money knowing it was not for this by Favre? Is there plausible deniability? It may not matter to the law but would change my view on how I look at Favre. ESPN was one of the entities that were accused by Favre so they have a reason to paint this in a certain light.

That was the best int id ever seen, it was like he was playing center field.

💯 agreed

Well, they were right, the pundits are always right and they said he sucks. Just saying and all that happy horsesh*t that kids say these days

Is sarcasm the same as being facetious? Also, how dare you? That is the antithesis of what you said, those two sticking around obviously means McDermott is a fun party man who pushes the limit right to the edge!

If you don’t like the product on the field, perhaps you should watch for the commercials.

Wait, are you saying the crazy train horn or crazy train by ozzy? Love Crazy Train!