What a Tuel

Probably because we pass more when we are behind (losing). Tyrod may or may not be the answer which is why they should draft someone with potential, but Tyrod is a decent starter to fill the gap. If he gets better, awesome! if he stays the same, then good thing we drafted someone.

Hope everything is well. The mental issues thing is BS though. Mental issues is a thing, and are a reason someone might go ballistic. I am not sure why people cannot distinguish between different threats. These do not need to be lumped together to satisfy some snarky attitude that international terrorism isn't as much a threat as domestic terrorism. As for guns, well we are a culture - with guns. It is time to get over that fact, and assign responsibility to the people who commit acts of violence. Whatever weapon this guy used did not persuade him to do it. Nor did whatever he used to make the bombs, or pipebombs or whatever the freak built.

my god the comments.

It's not about comparing the two, It is about saying "Hey look, this guy isn't peyton manning yet, but neither was peyton manning.". I know, I know, the eye test is far superior.

The tower fell on the wall, and walkers were wandering the town. I think she pretty plainly wanted to deal with this situation quickly so she could turn her attention on more pressing matters. The concussion didn't help. A lot of people are pissed about Morgan. I understand this particular wolf is not likable, but at some point in a post apocalyptic world people have to stop killing each other, come to terms with what they've done, and work together to rebuild. You can see this theme in several of the characters story arcs, each one caring about someone who either wronged them, or they have no reason to care for. What emerges from that is a stronger group. This guy is particularly unlikable, and I don't think the audience tolerates Morgan keeping him alive. But again it's a spectrum across most of the storylines. Morgan is one side (all life is precious). Carol is the other side of the spectrum (look at the flowers), and they inevitably clash.

Me too, but it's either him or Stefon Diggs against Seattle. I like Sammy's upside better

Schwartz declined being their HC last offseason. I heard that somewhere anyway.

Unfortunately because of the weather, and Sammy's past two games, I didn't but I still won! Now the question is Sammy this week against the Texan pass rush. I think I have to start him.

Which ones?

They just let half of them go through their hands.

Not only did he come back, but he doubled down with a new post. Sammy had 6 targets in the New England game. 3 catches. So since I have looked at each target recently let's focus on the 3 "drops". 1 was uncatchable 10 yards out of bounds. 1 he didn't "fight back for" 1 he did fight back for and got the PI So 3 misses in New England? Take a step back and realize you are being ridiculous.

I'd say Winston. Carr may be more predictable, but the Titans Defense has been shutting down certain players from a fantasy stand point week after week. I don't think the Colts can make the same claim.

Didn't realize the check engine light was on for 2 months?......

Heath is always all about our Bills no matter how much we let him down. Hopefully we can make a playoff run, and make him look good! http://www.nfl.com/videos/buffalo-bills/0ap3000000487567/Heath-Evans-predicts-12-4-record-for-Bills

Yeah I hear his WR's are a bad matchup for Seattle. Rivers has nearly (and actually) burned me a few times this season. Yet again thanks for the advice! Good luck to you too!

Thanks, I think that is who I will play.

If NY won the courts consideration of banning DFS, I do not believe NYS would then pass a law saying it was legal if they pay them more money. I don't believe they will win this first round though, so I believe they will negotiate a way to take these companies down a notch and regulate the industry. That is still only by failing to ban it though, IMO.

Why? I think they have a tougher schedule than us, and I believe we will end up with the conference tiebreaker over them. They may be a game ahead of us, but they win 3 of the next 6 and I don't think they make the playoffs.

Then why is Online Poker not legal still?

How so? What do they gain financially by banning it? Currently winners still need to claim their winnings as income for tax purposes. (They are supposed to anyway.)

Ok, I have a bit of a conundrum here. One league I have: Bortles vs SD Rivers @ JAC and another league I have: Rivers @ JAC Roethlisberger @ Seattle I think I am 95% sure I want to play Bortles over Rivers in that game. However the second league is a more difficult choice, and I need this win! So do I play Rivers and hope he finds his few remaining weapons, or trust Roethlisberger to work his magic up in Seattle?

Ok as we all know, Sammy has not been getting the ball these last two games, but Rex has said they need to! So with that under consideration and the Chiefs allowing the 2nd most average fantasy points to wide receivers, do I start Sammy Watkins? This is a must win for me. My other wideouts are: Calvin Johnson (locked in at WR1 Thank God) Stefon Diggs @ATL Amari Cooper @TEN So basically pick 2 of the 3 WR's for my WR2 and Flex.

I'd go with that. That is why I say NYS has ulterior motives for banning it rather than it simply being technically "gambling" and not liking it. There is a reason they are avoiding season long fantasy, and that difference is the large transfer of money happening weekly with daily fantasy. We are talking about a ton of money. Some people have been saying it's NYS supporting the brick and mortar gambling ventures like the lottery, and casinos, but I don't buy that,