quinnearlysghost88

I think you spend more time patting yourself on the back then actually arguing your point. But none of us would understand that. You've been an analytics guy before they even kept track of sacks. You were keeping track though. You were.

I'm definitely not going to try to figure out what's in your mind. It's a football message board, and I don't care. But, if you're going to hide behind qualifiers like "most likely" and "by a lot" then do so. Why even write this if you're going to sidestep it when pressed with FACT that 7 playoff QBs last weren't Top 10s. I'm not tackling your whole rant, just the part where you blow up about the Bills never being able to secure a top 10 pick because we're just good enough not to be slotted there. and then your deduction is that we need a top 10 QB to be maybe, likely, hopefully, almost always, in certain cases, when otherwise not successful. More qualifiers to fall back on.

So, in your mind, only teams with top 10 drafted QBs will ever be successful? Let's look at last year's playoff QBs, and see who was a top 10: Foles: No Brees: No Smith: Yes Luck: Yes Kap: No Wilson: No Rivers: Yes Rodgers: No Manning: Yes Brady: No Cam: Yes Dalton: No 7 QBs not drafted in the top 10 (or even the 1st round) and they MIRACULOUSLY made it to the playoffs!! 1 even WINNING THE SUPERBOWL. HOW?! How could they possibly do that if they weren't drafted top 10? That's unpossible.

Blue 80 was definitely being called out last night by Rothleisberger. My roommate, not a Bills fan, even said isn't that the Bills call?

Did you just make up a thing? I don't hear anyone hating kyle orton. he is what he is.

EXACTLY. They would just run to that side.

It's not the the amount of penalties or yardage, it's the TIMING of the penalties. Giving the patriots a few false starts on first down doesn't mean ****.

oh the made up fairytale marketing gimmick QBR stat that ESPN made up 4 years ago. definitely the best barometer for success.

http://regressing.deadspin.com/how-do-the-most-common-nfl-scores-compare-to-soccer-1642711565 You're looking at a 0.01% chance. I like those odds.

could you imagine both Spikes playing side by side?

the last two games I've attended at the Ralph were Pats games where they scored 56 and 52. If you look back on the boards you'll probably see fans saying 'THIS time is different' right before those games. But, honestly, this time is different.

This game is going to be a shootout. Our defense has looked stout in every facet except the secondary, and Brady is starting to find his legs..er. arm. I'm giving it to the Bills on a CLOSE game, where special teams is the difference maker (field position battle/TD return)

it was his first game in 10 months. what exactly were you expecting?

thanks, i was unaware of this.

That is just so true. We can't take it either way. I think the one scenario we like is when OTHER teams' players are telling the truth about their teammates.

this was the first thing i thought about when i woke up. it's great NE lost and we're the de facto first place team, but we need those two guys to be effective in the long run.

The Buffalo Bills: Where you're allotted 14 games to go from rookie to playoff QB.

http://regressing.deadspin.com/e-j-manuel-was-the-most-dreadful-catastrophic-of-week-1640306407 merge if covered.

"Is there anything Ryan Fitzpatrick can't do"

Hahahaha

I know you're mad jake but you gotta get your own

living in Charlotte, I can say that Cam is a stand-up player, but hates questions from the media.

Conti was hitting like an as&h*le all game long. He deserved what he got in OT.

he had a fantastic block on that EJ bootleg, so. I'll take it anyway i can get it right now. there are probably teams with a good TE and they wish they had just one of our RBs. you can't have it all.

Tavern on the tracks charlotte bills backers. Buckets of blue light. Beef on weck. Go bills!