Jump to content

34-78-83

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,186

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 34-78-83

  1. 34-78-83
    He'd be great on 1st and second down ... not as much a need , but certainly a luxury
  2. 34-78-83
    I have no idea why we would want Peppers or Ware .... We have a blistering pash rush as it stands.
  3. 34-78-83
    sorry for those of you that respect these guys (I do too at times) but they just don't have a respectable level of knowledge about our team to have any relevance. Glenn is a very impressive young LT. They may draft a tackle, but not to play LT.
  4. 34-78-83
    makes sense
  5. 34-78-83
    Keep him... Schwartz is going to adapt to the players we have here. He has said it himself. Not sure why people make the blatant assumption that he's going to change the scheme so drastically as to make one of our best moves in years meaningless.
  6. 34-78-83
    Mr. King needs to review what Andre did in his PLAYOFF career (not just SuperBowls, the whole Playoffs) and also consider he played in bad weather on a team that ran as much as it passed. If he took all this into account there is no chance he'd still feel that way.. Tim Brown? Seriously?
  7. 34-78-83
    September 5, 1993 Home opener vs. New England? If so yes that was certainly one of his greatest plays...
  8. 34-78-83
    Long time comin' Andre!!
  9. 34-78-83
    Yep. I mentioned it early on in this thread too And I can't recall a down where there were less than 2 DT's on the field. Well explained!
  10. 34-78-83
    Our "3-4" defense this past year was about 90% 4-3
  11. 34-78-83
    I think it's a year by year thing. This year the focus on depth was to fill many traditional positions like Corner and Safety and QB due to injuries, and Oline due to ineptitude. Without knowing for sure I would think this took precedence over ST abilities. That's not to say that Crossman is a good coach or a bad coach as he may prove to be as horrible as many are saying he is, but given what the staff decided (no change at that coaching spot), it gives him basically one more chance to prove it was the players (lack of ST talent) who ultimately failed.
  12. 34-78-83
    That's a nice way of putting it.... Agreed
  13. 34-78-83
    thin depth makes for poor special teams... This almost always comes to fruition. Likely (but I cannot prove) the REAL reason Crossman was retained. Disecting special teams film is tough if you're not one of the guys with the plan.
  14. 34-78-83
    Thanks for the info... Again though 1- I'm not concerned w/ Irvin and 2- Football is not baseball. Reed was the primary receiving threat on a ferrari of an offense that ran more than it passed and played likely more bad weather games than any other team. The numbers are fun but it's clear watching Reed play (whether you lived it or just watching highlights) that he was dominant in a large number of games over his career, and was the best run after catch guy of his time not named Rice.
  15. 34-78-83
    Thanks!
  16. 34-78-83
    what is it that some of you don't like about Evans? Not debating, just looking for education
  17. 34-78-83
    I agree with that personally, just not a 1st rounder...
  18. 34-78-83
    Irvin is already in no? Not sure what the point is there. I'm not debating Irvin vs. Reed. Reed and Rice were the poster boys for RAC. Reed played in horrible weather more than any of his peers too. And numbers in different era's are harder to compare in football than they are in say baseball. I agree that it's nice/valuable of Dave to point out the numbers ...
  19. 34-78-83
    ^^^^^^ Nailed it. Plus the naysayers may end up right or may end up wrong, but they have not a clue if he'll develop or not, and there is nothing that they know of about EJ that the staff isn't already aware of.
  20. 34-78-83
    Not worried about Irvin ... Was talking about Reed's playoff performances as a whole. On top of all that, numbers should only be a part of it. To the Eye test of all who watched him , Reed (and Rice) basically invented the term Run after Catch. There was no Wr better over the middle as well, and possibly none better in cold weather.
  21. 34-78-83
    What Reed did in the playoffs makes all the difference ( or should ) .... We shall see
  22. 34-78-83
    Good stuff thanks for sharing!
  23. 34-78-83
    Bad Simulator (Chargers)
  24. 34-78-83
    Kinda funny I suppose... However if you are watching the games you will see just how that makes sense. It's usually been a LB or a Safety missing a Fit. Our run D is like Barry Sanders kinda ... Yds gained often look like this (per play): 1,0,3,2,4,35,1,-2,3,3,40
  25. 34-78-83
    I can't think of one commonality between Fitz and Cutler other than both being Qb's and caucasian . Possibly one of the worst comparisons imaginable.
×
×
  • Create New...