34-78-83

It’s been enjoyable, yes. The disappointing part for me is while we all know the o-line needs some improving in the off season, I feel like they could have played well enough to get the job done and allow the team to advance a couple rounds in the playoffs or even help get us a chance to win out and win the division. Now that 3 of them are down with Covid I don’t feel like we’ll get that opportunity barring a Christmas miracle 🎅

Beasley just went out this week. I give up on you getting my point that you replied to initially. Gabe has yet to moved to #2 WR on this team, so wtf are you talking about. The whole premise is Gabe getting moved to #2, which I would like to see happen, thus putting a healthy Sanders in the slot at times, or hell even Diggs in the slot at times with Sanders at the other outside position. I have never made crap up to make a point here or anywhere else. You just don't get what I am saying and are arguing with the wind.

A rivalry requires competitive balance, or close to it. So we may NOW have a rivalry with them which you could at least subjectively say started with them in the 2nd Pats game in 2019. Prior to that, not a rivalry.

Apparently somehow this was missed when posted above ... err something

80 percent of our snaps seem to be 3 wr or 4 wr on the field. Am I wrong? I think Gabe should be the #2 WR on this team behind Diggs. Do you disagree? In a 3 or 4 WR set with no Beasley, Gabe and Sanders (if healthy) are going to be on the field at the same time a lot. Disagree? I wasn't asking if YOU were talking about the Pats game but the discussion as a whole was looking at Sanders coming back in time to be there (for this PATS game) in light of Beasley having Covid. Rrrriiiight making stuff up for sure. The funny part is we agree on the main point.

Thank you. It’s not close in 2021.

He wasn’t responding to the Joe B rating info, he was responding literally to the all 22 analysis video link I posted

We’re talking primarily about this upcoming game without Beasley no?. And in either the 3 wr or 4 wr set (like 80% of our plays), we’re going to have Gabe and Sanders ( if healthy) in there together at times, not back or white at all. The black or white you and so many fall prey to is “if Davis is good then Sanders has to suck”, which is what my entire argument is against because that’s 100% false. Should Davis be the primary #2 in my opinion? YES

Gabe is who I want at #2 WR. That is reflected in both of my posts in this thread if you read them. Why are you doing exactly as I pointed out in my first response? ( the black or white thing) 😀

A look at some of the good sound play in this last game by your favorite punching bag

Fair point but as I said there are many factors there, some of which are not directly related to Sanders like weather ( NE game), better pass defenses faced, forcing the offense into shorter throws, Josh finding other targets on a game by game basis. It doesn’t mean he t be productive still with less snaps than Gabe as I propose.

Why is it always black or white? Sanders or Gabe? Sanders has not “ fallen off a Cliff” but has been less targeted for a whole variety of reasons. Yes I think Gabe should play outside as the 2 and Sanders as one of the slots more often. 80 percent of our snaps seem to be 3 wr or 4 wr on the field.

300 level, 100 level, whichever it is, the general standard for us and it seems like most is - Stand at all times when the Bills are on defense and yell your a$$ off. Sit and zip it when the offense is on the field, other than big plays/scores etc. As some have also said, at times you need to stand to see because others in front of you are standing. I'm not the type who would ever lay into someone for standing in front of me when they "Shouldn't be". I feel like those are generally male versions of Karens who call those folks out. Those people should watch from their living rooms if they aren't happy.

It's just more lazy reporting. NE ran 46 times and passed 3. Of course there would be a lot of yards gained on 46 carries. Now the Colts laid it on us for real.

Eye in the sky baby!!! Its the best thing the league has done in decades regarding in-game corrections. Absolutely the best thing that was birthed out of the XFL or wtvr that league was called. In a league of inconsistent reffing, the eye in the sky is a win for the good guys.

Did he really? Wow I am surprised and give him credit for that. Typically he's myopic and stubborn... Good to hear (not that it matters really but...) Fixed 🤣

Yes Gabe should be the #2 for many of the reasons already cited. That is NOT a slight on Sanders. Sanders (along with Beasley) can still be heavily involved in the slot (he's played there many times before) and we use more than 2 receivers on nearly every down.

Shopp’s undies are wet tonight with these 4th down attempts. 😁

Morse won't be a cap casualty. 1 - he's good. 2- There is no replacement in waiting. 3- even good prospect Draft picks at Center can take 2 to 3 years to develop unless you strike gold.

The wind is the only true factor, and somewhat the heavy rain at times... We've played in a record number of high wind games at home this season. PIT game - 25-30 mph, WFT game - 25-35 mph winds... In the hurricane that was the NE game, the team realized by the 3rd quarter basically that " oh crap, this big a$$ farm boy we drafted CAN throw in this insane wind and that should STILL be our strategy in such games.

Regarding Utah John's post that you are reacting to here ^^ ... That is not at ALL what it is. The post on-field ref ball placement adjustments were seeing pop up across the league in all the games are the new "eye in the sky" official. It has actual been a great add for the NFL and is achieving a much higher degree of spotting accuracy. This is fact. With that said, I hope they add the ability to overturn other horrific calls (like PI or no PI) to the abilities of the "eye in the sky" official.

I understand the draft is not the end all be all. I am looking for talented depth. I presume there will be FA moves as well, as in a new starting Guard.

I am hoping for something like this - 1 - DT (gotta take them early) 2 - G 3 - Speed WR 4 - G 5 - BPA 6 - BPA 7 - BPA

Outside of the last play of the game I thought Dane was phenomenal! Great tackling, Held up in coverage on Gonk, held his own against others. He's an excellent depth player for this team and I hope he keeps up the good play out there in Tre-day's absence.

Good takes overall and a breath of fresh air over all the "Fire everyone, Bills are awful" takes that would literally get this team nowhere. For # 4, it was a Rub route and the DB (pretty sure it was Dane but not 100%) that was supposed to follow took the wrong assignment so Edmunds tried to help and trail that route, but Perriman is the fastest WR on the BUCS so no linebacker is going to stay with him obviously, nor would a MLB be assigned to him on such a play. Cover1 postgame discusses it. Tremaine manned up in the post game interview as well and didn't call out the missed assignment.