34-78-83

While your points are 100% correct, he's an outside linebacker in a 4-3. He HAS to drop into coverage on many occasions just by nature of his position. If we had lots of depth we could use him on sure run downs or sure pass downs as a blitzer but that isn't the case.

The high wind warnings continue here til about 9:00 they're saying. Not sure about right in Buff... Sometimes I see things on this board that really make me question if I see the game of football correctly after 30 years... But I'm quite sure in the point I am trying to make here after some further thought and review.

I don't see who wouldn't have fumbled in that situation. It's not like he held the ball out like a loaf of bread. Dean you know I respect your thoughts on many issues but I think you should (If you can stomache it) look at the QB performance again with an open mind and an eye on what the wind was doing with the ball. Hopefully you have it recorded. If you still feel like he played a poor game then maybe I'm the one missing something when it comes to football.

Nope. Preston cost us 3 and Dockery's wiff gave them the ball in our territory. The ran in the red zone and we didn't. There's your 13-0.

The game was managed by the coaches. When our QB was asked to pass the ball, he passed it well in severely high winds. That's all I'm saying here (not sure about others). The sack fumble would not be considered "on the QB" in the film review considering the LG's man came free and blindsided our QB within 2 seconds. That man is supposed to be accounted for and most plays run out atleast 3 or more seconds. The Golden boy on the other sideline did no more than our QB did.

I can't argue with the zero points generated by the offense. This was not a day where a pass by a QB was going to win the game either though. Cassel has been putting up Brees numbers and look what he did today.And Trent was pretty solid throwing when he did have to. Even into the 60 MPH wind.

Not what I'm saying crayonboy, I'm saying he played pretty well inb the weather not excusing him and I fail to see how he created a TD for the other team. That Sack FF occured within 2 seconds from the back side as Dockery blew his block.

They do know more... A ton more Well atleast those two guys do.

Thank you thank you thank you.... Bump More people need to understand this. And like it or not Trent played pretty darn well considering the conditions today. There have been many respectable posters saying otherwise today and I just can't figure out why. Trent showed me a lot today both with his arm and his toughness. Some of you need to re-watch the game seriously, not that it will be easy... Hell my basketball hoop blew over onto may Dad's truck today and it wasn't as windy here in the Rochester area as it was in Buff.

Wade was a great coordinator. I'll leave it at that.

Not a chance in Hell

Your "GM" of the Bills is Brandon/Modrak/Guy not simply Brandon. I'm not saying anything about whether they've done a great job or not.

Brandon made it quite clear that he is indeed not a "football guy" and thats why those duties are handled by Modrak and Guy. What a typically stupid commentary by PFW

Nice points. A win feels good doesn't it? I think the O-line once again played above average today. To me, we find a Center, keep Duke as a backup as he is flawed but much improved, and this line can be good. Find a TE and we can have some success more consistently on offense.

Agreed 100%... OMG we have some depth at tackle! Ged rid of them !!!

That Defensive hold was SUCH Bullsh--

This was a bad call but a much worse call was Buffalo vs. Denver at home in the pouring rain calling a double reverse to Andre Reed in overtime to lose the game. Shockingly, Andre fumbled the wet ball... That was the Wade ERa if I recall correctly.

I seriously doubt this would ever happen with a player of his caliber at his position. This is not a replaceable skill position guy. If it does happen though we'll all know for sure that there is no hope of the Bills fielding a consistent winner on the field, atleast until ownership changes.

That's better

Either I'm missing something here or please read my post again.

They really can.

....... And dream about trading their established pro-bowl players for 1st round picks who have a 50% chance of being a complete bust.

I think that says it well.

Players and Coaches count 2/3rds and fans were down on the guy this year. That's gotta say something. Also Peter King knows no more about O-line play than many of us do here.

As I understand it , you could vote a thousand times for a guy but ultimately the fan vote is only going to count one third.