BringBackFlutie

I think we need to beat the Jets to put us in position for the playoffs. That puts us at 6-2. The next 4 games of NO, SD, KC, and NE- we must win 2 of them. That's 8-4. We then need 2 more wins out of Miami x2, NE, and the Colts. That will get us to 10 wins. None of that is outrageous. In fact, it's probable. However, it becomes harder if we're in a position to need a win against NE or to sweep the Dolphins. So the Jets win is important.

I'm sorry...Even if I were a Tom Brady fan, this **** is weird.

I admire your work here.

Looks like a keeper to me.

The latter.

Isn't that kind of how we've been winning, though?

Whatever bruh. I'll drink it.

40-0

National media attention for the Bills? Nice! This is better than the power rankings on NFL.com!

Can't we switch it up? Can I incorporate my favorite kinds of food? Like carrotcakewalk? Sliderswalk? Applebeesappetizerswalk?

Cool. But where's your recipe? I think the turkey sliders are perfect. Maybe make them with the flaky dinner rolls instead of regular mini burger rolls. ...or how about cranberry stuffed turkey stuffing meatballs? http://www.familyfeedbag.com/2011/10/cranberry-stuffed-turkey-meatballs.html ...I'd add gravy for dipping.

Oh COME ON!!!!!! This is AWFUL! (although I did chuckle under my breath a bit about upsetting your "young son") He's trying harder and digging a deeper hole. We need another thread.

Hi. I think I agree with you. Please make paragraphs. It's easier for us to read and provide feedback.

This is sloppy. I was pretty high on you for a while. Now I'm not so sure.

Done. 86.

Wait, who are you from Jimmy's?

Good for everyone.

I just watched the hide and seek skit. Awesome. Between that and the kamehameha, juju is my favorite person.

Isn't that Gailey's offense?

Weird. I went to high school with his kids.

It looks to me like Dareus is driving his man into the pocket. I think that's his job. Remove lanes for the QB to step up. He's ridiculously strong.

Well, it is a message board, so useful information tends to be current topics of discussion, which are newly created threads. When there's a current topic that happened to be discussed in a very old thread, I'd say 90% of the time people are just creating a new thread anyway. Is migrating only the structure and usernames cheaper/easier? If that's the case, I think it's a no-brainer- especially if there's an archive. Also, think of the usability of the boards with fresh content. Less volume of content makes searching for older threads easier, and may encourage users to do that more often, rather than create duplicates. By the time the board fills back up, perhaps users will have adopted better habits. Typically with things like data migrations, the effort involved is the planning of the migration, not so much the volume of data being moved. That's usually easy to scale. So I imagine, from an effort standpoint, if he keeps any old posts, it's just as much of a hassle as keeping all of them.

Too bad for them that they don't have Peterman on their team. Ryan would be replaced this week.

That was after mariucci said we better get used to it. Ugh.

Hahaha is that Godzilla over Rochester?