Jump to content

SawchukBills

Community Member
  • Posts

    440
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SawchukBills

  1. We need to sign Incognito first...here's hoping that happens before the March 4th deadline...
  2. Would we all want this guy? Yes BUT...he's an in between-er...#9 is too high...and he wont make it to the second round... But seriously with the hole we have to fill (LT,NT,QB), if Iupati was there in the 2nd should we take him...probably not
  3. Makes no difference...as much as Shanny was a fan favorite pick, I think we lucked out with Gailey... Gailey and Buddy interviews seem to always give me hope...very open, very upfront, and no BS Buddy + Gailey = optimism for the present/future
  4. No one can question his leadership and intangibles as a football player...but look at this clip where Tebow talks about the changes he is/trying to incorporate Tebow's Approach I'm starting to like him more than some of the others... 1st round: NO! 2nd round: maybe... 3rd round: heck yeah! I would be mad at Buddy if he trade back up in the 1st/2nd if Tebow is still there...it's gotta work sooner or later right???
  5. I don't think were can ever be labeled as "set". Our injured-riddled past tends to agree with me....here's hoping the new S&C coaches cut that list down in half!
  6. WOW ..because the Redskins are owned and operated by a Native American tribe??? way too much time on your hands...
  7. 1) In a heart beat if we get another second round...(see number 2) 2) Yes 3) Hopefully 4) Either him or Dan Williams (assuming he slips...unlikely) One can only dream...
  8. If I were the Lions, I would want to trade down. They need a lot more than 1 player...as for us...we are in a similar situation... Moving up 7 spots isn't going to do a whole lot for us...except take away other draft picks... PASS!
  9. Wow, everyone needs to stop with all the "trade Lynch" cries. ...and there is no way we should trade Lynch and sign Westbrook. I don't know how many teams are lining up for his services but the only way we, the Bills, should approach this is in a D. Rhodes capacity. If we can sign him for cheap...do it...gives us 3 RBs...and release/trade the worst one or hold on to him in the common event of injury
  10. Just curious...while no draft pick comes with a 100% guarantee, my thinking is best player available would result in a better football team in the long run... Thoughts?
  11. It's funny what a person might say when he's technically unemployed. Let's see what TO says after he gets signed by a team...
  12. Agreed! No brainer...but like Okung falling to #9...not likely... Let me dream though... 1rd = Okung 2rd = Williams Ahh..back to reality
  13. I was hoping that the 1 in a 1,000,000 chance that Bill and his boys gave in the Vince's wishes and signed him long term or let him walk....ohh well...
  14. Sign me up! ...after the 3rd round...Maybe the 3rd...
  15. Sad day, would've been huge. Add a NT and take one from a division rival...but no big surprise here...
  16. If we can get either a solid NT (assuming all don't get franchised) OR a solid OT drafting will be a bit more straight forward. Let's face it, for next season, we won't find ALL our immediate answers in the draft...we will have to rely on UFAs to AT LEAST hold us over. I'm hoping for a NT in free agency.
  17. Based-solely on past 1st round draft picks, I would agree 100%.
  18. Wow I don't know how to react to drafting 7 out of 9 linemen. Would definitely fill some holes and provide some depth (assuming they pan out). ...Why not I guess
  19. At this point in time, I'd be for signing/trading for a QB that had to work his butt off to win the starting job...and not just have it handed to him because we paid a hefty price to get him here... I really don't think Edwards/Brohm are all that bad...new coaches new life...so bring in a guy that will push the two and may the best man win.
  20. Great! Didn't want to see this guy in Buffalo...not that it was going to happen anyway.
  21. Rd 2, please no! Rd 3, only if we addressed the OT and/or DT/LB situation (i.e. - Bulaga/Okung/Davis/McClain/Williams/Cody) Rd 4-7, if he drops this far I don't see why not
  22. I would love to trade out of the nine and receive a lower 1st round draft pick and another later on...I think a lot of the talk on this forum about who we should take at #9 involves guys who can be argued to be "reaches"... Question is would Houston/Jaks or anyone else for that matter want to? Beats me...here's hoping
×
×
  • Create New...