Jump to content

SawchukBills

Community Member
  • Posts

    440
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SawchukBills

  1. Sign him to a cheap offer, let him battle it out with whoever we have and release the dead weight...I'm all for it!
  2. I like it! But I agree with the swapping of Cam Thomas for Cody..although Cody didnt beat Rich Eisen in the 40 yard dash... As far as LeFevour or Brown, I'm okay with either.
  3. I predict Fitzy will get the boot, we sign a mid-level free agent QB, and then draft a late round QB.
  4. Too bad for him in terms of money but maybe he could slip...slip to us in a later round
  5. I say lets sign Scott, Incognito, and Wilson first! Then worry about a pipe dream like Peppers, Dansby, or other FA that is going to want a lot of years and millions of dollars.
  6. No thank you! As unsure as people are about TE/RF/BB, Bulger would be worse. Say no to a 32 years and counting QB. I say stick with what we have or gamble on the draft. With Bulger you know what you're going to get.
  7. Haha...well I truly believe he's not a fit for the 3-4...especially with our DTs turning into DEs and our DEs presumably turning into OLB
  8. With free agency opening up in a few days, I'm curious to find out who everyone thinks we should hang on to... We already know Denney,TO,Reed are gone...who else? I say we have to keep: McKinney Incognito Scott Wilson PS: we have quite a few free agents...but I only listed those that matter...sort of... Bleacherreport's Take
  9. Very true...but I could see a scenario where a team trades up to snag whoever slips....bonus for us!
  10. The poll results remind of the situation in "Who wants to be a millionaire" when "poll the audience" gives no help what so ever...
  11. This is the absolute worst case scenario with these 8 off the board when we draft: Suh McCoy Okung Bradford Clausen Bulaga Davis McClain As unlikely as this may be (Berry, Mays or maybe Haden should get picked), I think we still go OT with Trent Williams or Bruce Campbell...relatively speaking, we are set at DE as compared to OT/DT
  12. Let's not forget what Chan brings to the Bills...the ability to succeed with below-average/average QBs (O'Donnell, Tomczak, Stewart, Fiedler). With Trent, Fitzy, Brohm, and a later Rd QB, I'm hoping there is something there that Gailey can work with.
  13. Exactly. Jauron isn't here and Gailey is a lot more offensive-minded. No way we grab a CB. It would be a tragedy if we select a WR...here's hoping Gailey and company are high on Steve Johnson and/or Hardy.
  14. I could see Chan wanting to start fresh with a new QB. But I really would like to see them draft a QB in the later rounds (3rd-5th). Only time will tell...this draft will define the Nix/Gailey era...I'm rootign for them.
  15. If this is accurate then no thank you...I would go against Nix's plan to build from the draft if we had to give away picks to move up 7 spots.
  16. I know the combine isn't supposed to significantly improve a players draft stock...BUT...Tebow did look good...interested to see what scouts think of his new motion... It would be hard to pass him up (assuming we go OT/DT in the first 2 rounds) in round 3...just saying...
  17. Agreed. At least is was a DT and not someone that plays RB/DE
  18. Don't know much about his except he went undrafted and spent most of his time on the practice squad. I'm hoping your comment means he's a hidden gem and not a lack of FA signings...
  19. Any trade we make that requires us to give up high draft picks and/or starters better be for areas of great need! Not tight end...
  20. Choice between Sneed and Tebow...is there even a question???
  21. The money saved will hopefully go to landing an immediate starter at a position of need (OT,NT,QB)
  22. I second that! Isn't this what everyone has been calling for since the Jauron era?
  23. How about we throw some money at a lineman (offense or defense) first?
  24. I wouldn't mind McClain but I really think we have to go OT/NT 1st/2nd round...
×
×
  • Create New...