OldTimer1960

Agree

I respectfully disagree - if a good OL is available, that can help the offense equally (or more) than a skill position. Still, I don’t expect to see an OT that is BPA at that point.

Could Miami end up with Jeudy or Lamb?

I think you are right

Funny!

Oh my goodness, look at the size of his Dad!

bad post, man. Have some heart.

?

Empty pizza boxes and beer cans, but I bet he has a clean sweatshirt on

That was a very nice letter. Shows quite a bit of maturity and character.

These points are why it is SO difficult to assess QB prospects. It is very difficult to tell who can process information quickly and make best decisions when some are sitting behind almost NFL quality OLs throwing to top level Pro WRs while others are running for their lives trying to make plays to midling WRs from a trailing position in many games that allows defenses to tee of on them.

Yes and probably still available at 55.

I think that Mack is considerably better than Ngakoue.

Bandit - you have Jonathan Greenard like 3 rounds higher than any ratings I’ve seen. He is enticing off the three games I watched and the Bills could surely use help there, but what is it that has most others targeting him as 3rd round or later?

I’m happy that he feels enough conviction and has enough confidence to pull the trigger on going to get players that he wants. That being said, he had SIGNIFICANTLY more “draft capital” to work with in the previous 2 drafts. I do think he will try to use 5th-7th round picks to move up in the 3rd or 4th round. I don’t think he will want to part with his 3rd or 4th to move up in round 2, but I would trust his judgment if he does.

They could be interested in either of them, but I’ll be surprised if they move up very far in 2nd - I really think they will not want to part with their 3rd or 4th picks.

Agreed. I want the Bills basically to pick the player that they rate highest mostly regardless of position played. If there are multiple equally rated players at different positions, then by all means consider need/roster building/potential future cost-cutting options. If BPA is a RB, then I hope they take him, if it is another position pick that position.

I don't think anyone is advocating reaching for a RB. I think the basic premise that the "pick RB" group is arguing is that it is pretty likely that one of the top 5 RBs (Swift, Taylor, Edwards-Helaire, Dobbins, Akers) is available at 54 and that they could very well be BPA at that point. I don't think anyone is saying that they MUST pick a RB in 2nd or 3rd just to get one.

Understood and agree. It is a rank order of the prospects - albeit without ability to tell how big of a gap/dropoff he perceives between players. One takeaway is that it looks like he has a big gap between the top Edge players and the next group. He has Anae, Weaver and Taylor between 75 and 90ish with Okwara and Greenard further down.

Would he play nickel DB or as a LB in those sets? I don’t know that I’d want to see him trying to cover Julian Edelman or someone similar. If the idea is as hybrid DB-LB for defensive flexibility, I could see it. I think given his age (24) and level of competition, Duggar is going to be drafted lower than many have speculated. Of course, I could be very wrong about that...

Can he play OLB - i’ve seen him mainly listed at inside?

Can Wilson play outside LB? I’ve seen him listed mainly as an inside backer.

Jeremiah was a scout and is pretty connected with the league. He released his top 150 today and it is pretty interesting - some players listed considerably lower and others higher than we’ve seen to date: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001110012/article/daniel-jeremiahs-top-150-prospects-in-the-2020-nfl-draft-class

By same token, how does idea of another safety differ? They have 2 good starting S.

Thank you - always enjoy your insights along with Gunner’s, Bandit’s, 716 and others that do their own evaluations.