BADOLBILZ

It's not true though. The Bills 1 tech position was a defensive weakness in 2019 as well. But they had a ridiculously easy schedule and great health. Still, there was much lamentation about the loss of Harrison Phillips.......who was indeed off to an excellent start in 2019. Lotulelei played the lowest % of snaps in his career and the Bills cut his pay after the season. The issues on defense last year were a MUCH harder schedule with much better QB's........injuries, especially to the LB corps...........and teams reacting effectively to the Bills increasingly predictable scheme. A lot of fans want to sum up the Bills shortcomings by the result of the AFCCG...........but the real indicator was the Colts game. A tired, veteran QB was able to thoroughly dissect a predictable scheme.....his waning physical ability just couldn't cash in a number of golden opportunities to put touchdowns on the board. And the inability of the Bills offense to push the ball downfield against the worst deep pass defense in the league turned what looked like a lopsided matchup into a struggle that only a huge individual effort from Allen saved them from losing.

No. Everyone knows what the Bills defense is trying to do. That's become part of the problem. The scheme and same personnel in the back 7 have been together for a relatively long time now and teams have adjusted.

It would have to be down to Mario Williams or Jason Peters. Peters was incredibly dominant for 3 seasons(prior to his holdout season).........and of course was the much greater player than Williams. Williams had two great seasons with Buffalo........he'd help a lot. But it's easy to look on paper and say the team is more needing of a pass rusher.........but likely having the best OL in football satisfies job #1 which is to maximize the potential of Josh Allen.......your biggest factor in winning and losing actual games. I think one of the mistakes fans make is to try to even out the talent on both sides of the ball. That's not actually how most SB winners have done it.

That works both ways though. With a team that is perceived as a SB contender you can't just assume that a guy who put up 1 sack on the season will improve dramatically or be good as your primary RDE. He also had a couple head injuries last season so basic availability has to be taken into consideration. When your production is terrible at a key position like that.......it rightfully should be a priority.

You lost me at 5th year option. You are mixing eras.....those didn't exist back then. The 1st round rookie deals were 5 years when Spiller was drafted(5 years $25M for Spiller). That was down from Whitner's rookie deal when they were still 6 years long. The flip side of excuses why he only had one exceptional season is that Gailey designed the system around his limitations to get the most out of him. Spiller was a very slow thinker on the field.......he literally couldn't understand play calls in the huddle as a rookie.......which is why he didn't play much as a rookie. He clearly never knew where the play designs were supposed to take him.......a direct contrast to the cerebral Fred Jackson. Spiller was very, very limited intellectually........as Sean Peyton found out.......he was unplayable in any kind of complex system. In summation, he was sold as Marshall Faulk 2.0 to justify picking him when RB was one of the few positions that they didn't need. For a top 10 pick........yeah he was a bust.

Yeah he's not an athletic freak. The majority of TE work is still blocking and boxing out coverage in the pass game so smaller TE's tend to disappoint, IMO. Evan Engram is an example......his numbers aren't great but even the numbers he does put up are hollow in their impact.......... and he's obviously much more explosive than Jordan. The other primary Miami TE, Will Mallory, is more of a big, lumbering conventional TE.........but IMO due to his size he has actually been more of a big play guy.

Physically, he's a day 3 pick. Small target for a TE. Very slow for a modest 6'2" receiving target at any position. Decent blocker and feel for coverage. But guys like that really gotta' grind to make it.....like Jonnu Smith did. He's not lazy but he has always been treated like the mega-recruit he was and a lot of excuses have been made for why he hasn't played like one. His pro day was a perfect example of my concerns with him. He ran like a near 4.69 and swore in disbelief that he always runs a 4.3 and jumps 6" higher than he did. Confidence is usually a plus but c'mon dude.

Ted Washington was not part of the "lost years". He only played for the Bills while Wade was the DC/HC.........which was a winning time(5 playoff appearances) with the exceptions of 1997 and 2000. He was cut in the first offseason that began the cultural decline of the Bills. In fact, he was easily the deepest cut that Donahoe made when carving up the Bills winning culture. They lost their heart and got soft as baby sh*t when they cut Big Ted. Mario would have been a great fit. Winfield would have been great too. A lot of the "big nickel to stop TE's" is nonsense..........trying to find a unicorn when the right CB will do........the tiny Winfield could and did shut down Tony Gonzalez because he could cover him and transition and play the run. Tre did well against Gronk in that role too. The Bills just don't have enough matchup corners. Disagree on all the rest for various reasons........mostly because they weren't good team players. Jason Peters was by far the best player of the GW and beyond years and he would be the best addition to this team...........the only lock HOF'er the Bills have developed since the 1980's.

People tend to forget that Pat Williams was not a guy who excelled at nose or 1 tech. He wasn't good at it because he had no interest in being that guy. He wanted to shoot thru gaps and get in the backfield. Once the great Ted Washington left, the Bills run defenses were mostly awful. Even when they went out and got another huge player in Sam Adams the two of them bickered about who would maintain the gap integrity and line up to draw the double and often NEITHER of them would. Fortunately they had a Takeo Spikes behind them. PW was a great player but he would not have been a complement to Oliver he would have been competing with him for snaps.

So because the Chiefs wasted a first round pick on a RB in round 1 last year you think that it is good strategy to select one this early?😉 RB's are still pretty easy to find.........especially in the Bills preferred outside zone blocking scheme which famously turned a lot of not highly regarded, one-cut runners into big producers..........blocking is always more important than the guy carrying the ball, but especially in this system. And needs change fast. The Chiefs had none last year but now they have some pretty big holes at OT and CB........two premium positions. It's never the right time to select a RB that early anymore.

So you are saying his fit would be at MLB in the McDefense?

These names both appeared in a lot of mock draft first rounds. Key was at one point considered a potential #1 overall.

Gotta' add the Dick Jauron moment that Aaron Boone provided the other day............when asked about his terrible offense thru 11 game his excuse was "it's hard to hit".😆

Agreed.....almost none at all definitely falls in the range of not enough.😉 I also agree that they will pick up his option. If they did not they would look pretty foolish having traded up to get him and defended ad nauseam his play in the position they moved him to 3 years ago. Same with if they moved him outside now. At this point I think the only way to right the wrong might have to be by accident.........have Edmunds go down for 4-6 games early.........have another LB fill in and actually make plays........and then have Edmunds come back as an OLB and do the same.

This take reminds me of the old "80% of the work is done by 20% of the people........and 80% of the people think they are the 20%" adage. You and Rico probably aren't the fans of sport to the level you think you are. The numbers do not support the idea that baseball and or basketball have ever not been popular over the last 30+ years. Even after strikes they've drawn fans and done well enough in ratings to keep getting bigger and bigger rights deals.

I don't think it's as "in the middle" as you think. He didn't actually take a step up in year 2.........any inroads he made due to experience were offset by the tentativeness that set in and the lack of plays made. The guy simply doesn't make plays. You can't deny it. Amazing stat: Tremaine Edmunds hasn't forced or recovered a single fumble in his last 41 regular season games! And it's not like he raises his game in the playoffs.........which might indicate untapped potential.........he's actually a worse player in big games.

MLB and NBA are still very relevant to the majority of sports fans.........the numbers and tv $ back it up. (Hockey is mostly irrevelevant though) Basketball is the world's #2 sport and organized youth baseball participation has grown exponentially over the last decade so the narrative that the fanbases of those sports are dying is not correct. But nobody in the US can match up to football.........it's king for viewership...........they just don't play enough games to marginalize baseball and hoops. The only thing people watch "live" on TV anymore is sports and you can tune into your favorite MLB team every night for 6 months and every other night in the case of hoops.

It's a story of greed. When they were bringing in $320M with a payroll of $240M back in 2004 the profits were great.............fast forward to 2019 and the revenue is $900M and the payroll was closer to $200M. The profit margin got insane and it magnified the greed and lessened the need to win. They will likely end up over .500 for the 29th straight season but Hal Steinbrenner needs an attitude correction. I was glad the woeful Mets actually got a competitive owner..........maybe Hal will feel some pressure to perform going forward.

Marv wasn't a chain smoker and his wife didn't adopt the native cat eye look(plus 10 pounds of other makeup)........so the people of 1970's Montreal never really accepted him as one of their own. He outlasted them. Congrats Marv!

First of all........his evaluation has nothing to do with Mahomes......his critics cited the same issues for 3 seasons now.......well before the Chiefs games. What does he do that is "special"? I don't want to invoke the old London Fletcher "all he does is tackle guys 10 yards downfield" mantra but the only thing Edmunds is really good at is tackling ball carriers from the side........which is often to say "after" the offensive play call has at least achieved it's minimum desired result. He simply doesn't make plays. Last season he had 0 interceptions, 3 passes defensed and 4 TFL. That is woeful. He hasn't even forced or recovered a fumble since his rookie year! If he were in the NFC he wouldn't be sniffing a pro bowl and without those nods he would be under a lot more scrutiny for not making plays.

They are but they wouldn't have to exercise a franchise tag until next offseason.........giving them another full year to evaluate him for at most a couple million more. The 5th year option becomes fully guaranteed on May 3 of this year. 5th year options used to be only guaranteed for injury when first picked up...........you could cut that player if they had a bad year 4 but were healthy........now you are stuck with them. Having a $11M-$12M fully guaranteed 2022 salary also doesn't help you sign him to a reasonable long term deal if he doesn't play lights out next year. Let's say you want to sign him for 3 years and $30M with $15M gtd.........he already HAS almost that much gtd in just 1 year. Better off dangling the carrot, IMO..........then if he continues to be just a modest producer and they still want to keep him they aren't competing against their own 5th year option #.

You know what they call Royale with Cheese in France?

It would be a mistake to pick it up. The franchise tag is only like $2M more and then you don't have the full guarantee permanently fixed on your cap in the event that he suffers an injury and misses the 2023 season altogether.

I loved the pick. Hated him being moved to MLB. I'm not swayed by the fact that he gets 100+ tackles. "Pedestrian Preston" Brown lead the NFL in tackles as the MLB in McD's defense in 2017. The system provides a lot of opportunity.......which makes Edmunds' modest production after 6 years as a college and pro LB rather discouraging.

He turns 23 soon after the draft. I remember when Houston selected 19 year old DT Amobi Okoye in 2007 and he put up 5.5 sacks as a rookie...........a record for 20 year and younger DT's! He started for 4 years.......signed with Chicago as a free agent and flamed out at 24. The common thread with Edmunds is that his best year as a playmaker was his rookie year.......and that he just leveled off and was adequate(and young) but didn't improve. The AFC is pretty weak at MLB........which helps Edmunds with the pro bowl nods.........but even so, Edmunds is still graded on a curve with the assumption that there is a lot more there as a MLB. If he had been a 3rd round pick at age 21-22 like a Preston Brown, they'd be looking for an upgrade on Edmunds because he's not been instinctive and doesn't make game changing plays at MLB.