RyanC883

thanks. explains why the no trade. Yeah, that's way too much for DeMarco when you have Henry sitting there.

Def want him here. Although we need a QB. He struggled w/o Luck.

that would be awful for us.

who is the DL that we signed?

This is total BS if it's true. I had season tickets in the past, now with kids I'm lucky to make 2 games. I live in Pittsburgh (which, is close to the 200 mile cutoff). PPL in Buffalo won't buy and re-sell? Come on. Some people buy tickets, can't afford the whole season, and then re-sell them. I'm out of town, and I rely on these people to get my game tickets. When I had tickets I went to about 1/2 the games and sold the others, to who I would assume are other Bills fans. Bills really don't have an out-of-town fan issue. The 200 mile policy is also absurd because Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Toronto, the Eastern 1/2 of Upstate and Southern Tier of NY are all included. There are TONS of potential brokers and fans of other teams in those areas. Why alienate your fans by limiting it to 200 miles. Lots of fans are out of town.

FINALLY. I've drafted Henry the last 2 years in fantasy only to be jerked around by the Titan's. Odd they couldn't trade him. I can see the Giants going after him.

I hope he's there at 21. The first round is going to be fun to watch. I could see 5 QB's gone by 21, or only 2 (Rosen and Darnold). Depends on whether the Saints, Steelers, etc. try to draft backups--and if Miami still wants to go w/ Tanny. If I'm the Saints and Steelers, no way I draft a QB. I'm going to max out on Brees and Ben's window to win.

you had a good point up until "if he was White and played at Tenn." Luke Falk has amazing accuracy, and is also knocked for having a "small frame," like Jackson. Although Falk is not fast, etc.

I'd be fine w/ that! This draft is amazing.

Imagine Gordon w/ a good QB!

what did we give up to move to 10 besides 21?

It's the Browns doing Browns things!

I hear ya. But we have LB and DT (possibly day 1 starters), and Ragnow allowed 0 sacks the last two seasons. He can also play guard, I believe.

He'd be the perfect Raiders CB. Wonder what Gruden has said about him in the past?

if we had "our" QB, this draft would be perfect for us. I'm hoping someone falls to us. Your right, I do feel like every year some "top 10" LB/DT falls into the 20's.

ha. I'm not sure Ivory is overpaid. The FO needed a "hammer" back and got one. I think he has another good 1-2 years.

Good point. I'll add him. ....wait, does not look like I can. Good catch though. JUST VOTE

I think it's BPA, assuming you don't have a stud at that position. I.E. we will not be taking a RB at 21 or 22.

We can get any QB. Who would your pick be??

Fanspeak Board. Difficult. Not sure I like this. Only "top" QB left at 21 was Allen, but I took a pass on him. 1: R1P21 EDGE MARCUS DAVENPORT UTSA 2: R1P22 OT KOLTON MILLER UCLA 3: R2P21 TE MIKE GESICKI PENN STATE 4: R2P24 QB LUKE FALK WASHINGTON STATE 5: R3P32 C FRANK RAGNOW ARKANSAS 6: R4P21 WR D.J. CHARK LSU 7: R5P21 S VAN SMITH CLEMSON 8: R5P29 RB JAYLEN SAMUELS NORTH CAROLINA STATE Rounds 1-3 are steals here. I love it. Don't know much about the other guys drafted. Not sure what happened to "Bo" last year in Bama.

Mayfield was available and you DIDN'T DRAFT HIM!!!! With the exception of not taking Mayfield, this is a great draft. BTW, what are the other teams doing where Mayfield and Vea are available at 21!!

I think in the OP's scenario we keep P. Brown (MLB) and draft Hughes replacement w/ the 21st (or 22nd) pick. I don't think this creates a spectacular hole. If the FO really likes a QB, this is a great value, IMO.

YES. In your scenario we still have a 1st round pick to take Hughes replacement, be it a LB or DL. Then draft another DL in the 2nd. I think it would take way more than this, but you never know. I think the Giants will not trade the pick. They want Barkely.

BTW: Love the Ivory signing. Grab a position of need w/ a proven player at a lower cost. Love having a hammer back.

I don't get the feeling that our FO will be overpaying for anyone. And I agree, glad Watkins is not our problem. I wonder if Graham takes an incentive-laden contract in NO?