Mr. WEO

exactly. He's done. So is the boy genius rep of McVay

He never treads new ground. All are obvious beefs. Anyone still complaining about pro sports league greed should just stop posting/writing. Ditto with sports celebrations. He needs to sit in his barcolounger with his transistor radio earplug in and relax in retirement, listening to the old timey radio calls.

He makes Sully look like Richard Simmons

NYC's most famous crank for decades..lol MORE FROM:PHIL MUSHNICK: NFLPA avoiding its biggest issue shows it only pretends to care about minorities US women's soccer team is incredibly hard to root for MLB's hideous streaming partnerships are filled with arrogant greed Baseball's game-over demonstrations reaching hackneyed levels Sports gambling grossness hits new low with Special Olympics betting controversy

You don’t get a lipoma from a hit, and they don’t burst.

well then Jairus Byrd should get in too

caveat emptor has always applied in any business transaction. Nothing new here. you had an outlier experience. It happens. Might as well start a thread about your ordered food arriving missing an item, or cold

I've never had a problem with them. Blame is on the seller.

Beane's office...

File this under “Mike Florio says NFL is considering expanding to 40 teams”

And this is the edited version…

Not last year

dude just wants to feel what it's like to get to the QB...

he's still a bum so, no.

It would be story nationally for part of a day, locally for a day or two. No firestorm.

The point was that a non charge isn't considered proof of innocence. It means it's a weak case.

I thought that was the Chargers team photo.

So lack of adequate evidence to get a conviction (and therefore charge) is "proof of innocence"? dude.....

Is this really your understanding of how this works? No way!

link? lol I have never said he has been proven guilty--why make attack such an odd straw man? One is found guilty or not guilty (or, in this case liable or not) in court. That's not what you said---"proven innocent" was what you said. Where did that occur?

Ohh, got it. So the comment below was just more jesting...

I have said nothing close to that. I'm asking simple questions. But since you stumbled into the room, where was Araiza "proven innocent"? He wasn't charged. He may, as a result of trial, be proven innocent, but he really hasn't yet. doc said only charged crimes are bad behavior. is that your view too? If so, then you also would have to agree that Watson should not have paid any of his accusers.

The new K tape...

Why did Watson settle if he did not engage in bad behavior?

right?? if only he could hit perpetually wide open Diggs the way he hits his mark in that (no doubt) 1 take commercial shoot!!