All Activity

Shameful.

Nice headline bias.............."gender affirming care" ?? 🙄 Supreme Court upholds Tennessee law restricting gender-affirming care for transgender minors CBS News, by Melissa Quinn https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-tennessee-gender-affirming-care-minors-us-skrmetti/

In a football-mad country, this League's championship game pulled in "LEGO Masters" numbers, and 1/3 of the viewers of an episode of "Georgie and Mandy's First Marriage"...

Rex really thought he was getting the job too 😝

Small favors: this moron isn't in thew decision making loop. https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/trump-insider-reveals-nobody-is-talking-to-hegseth-as-iran-crisis-spirals/ar-AA1H1V7L or this one: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/tulsi-gabbard-sidelined-trump-administration-discussions-israel-iran-rcna212702 Just bad jokes to appeal to the base.

Right.

The what if scenario that terrorists might be among the millions of "migrants" allowed to pour over the border is truly outlandish. Eye roll worthy.

😂 I don’t want the Jets telling me what’s a good idea and what is not. Might I suggest they work out an actual contract extension before trading for someone who then decides he doesn’t want to play for you?

that would be 80mph, lol. come on. I set cruise control for 85 and I'm getting passed routinely. This kid's a clown, but this is nothing

Fiscal responsibility magically disappears when they control all three branches. Suddenly, deficits don’t matter, ethics are optional, and 'doing the right thing for the American people' takes a backseat to power consolidation. Funny how debt and morals only seem to matter when Democrats are in charge.

A proposed $5 trillion debt limit increase could make it hard for Republicans to maintain their fiscal hawk credibility.

A proposed $5 trillion debt limit increase could make it hard for Republicans to maintain their fiscal hawk credibility.

Yes you were deliberately bald-faced lying. And I take offense to THAT being permitted unfettered simply because it's perceived as "in defense" of the team. This is a fan site. Not a team sanctioned platform. There was a heavily censored team message board for people like you but the team decided those fans weren't worth the time and kicked everyone there to the curb. If you want to advance discussion or just not look illogical then don't create false facts. I've been here 27 years and if a team/player criticism is exaggerated for effect I respond the same way as I do to your homer BS. You can't have logical football discussions with the outrageous hyperbole so when someone like you just wants to shout down a topic with nonsense I will call it out.

.

a bit different but I Like it. Jazz is usually not my thing. This clip is new so it qualifies here . I LOVE the visual

Cook and Knox should flip salaries, I mean why are we paying 14 million for a guy with back to back 22 catch seasons.

Oh they will for sure. It's just that typically the home team is trying to stop fans from reselling to opposing fans. But now the Jets are actively encouraging it. Bold move.

nah. they share dissatisfaction and restlessness. They don't need reminding. ideology is just a word most don't understand.

Where did I say its a bad thing to design an offense to take advantage of a players strengths?? The question was can a player who isn't very smart win an MVP, and my answer was yes if he is put in the perfect offense for him and gets massive help from the media. That gimmicky read option Offense with a future first ballot Hall of Fame RB standing right next to him is the only Offense he would be successful running.