All Activity

Not really, but pouring Vodka into a plastic cup and drinking it doesn't really require a lot of preparation.

Our DEF already has too many guys that are great at stat-padding against bad teams in the regular season and disappear against good ones in the playoffs. That's exactly the type of player Parsons is. Why would we give up significant assets and blow a hole in our salary cap to go after a guy like that?

Well there you go...

⬆️ Reliable! 😂

Happy Birthday Marvy

#3 on Roundy's top 10 heroes list.

Not so sure it's that they have to worry about losing their job it the report is unfavorable; more so they have to worry about losing their job it their initial estimate ends up getting significantly revised consistently in the next 2 quarters. The initial jobs reports have been wildly inaccurate since she took over in 2022. Hate the way 47 made it look like he's canning her for not giving him results that are favorable to him because she actually has been giving initial reports that were favorable to him (at least the last 2 months) and she did that consistently for 46 as well. If he nominates someone for that post that actually starts getting the estimates close to correct, that would be beneficial. Time will tell if he does or not.

So I took some time to read that Annex stuff. I think Ross Douthat just about sums up where I'm at on all of this: Then consider Russiagate, where we have cycled from one conspiratorial reading of the 2016 election to another: The resistance theory about malign Russian influence over Trump’s campaign or Trump himself, which birthed the Robert Mueller investigation and a climate of hysteria, has given way to the Trumpist theory that the Obama administration conspired to promote a false narrative about collusion in order to cripple the Trump presidency from the start. In each case, the theories have been interpreting the same underlying conspiracy, largely hidden in 2016 but more visible since — a Russian information operation to undermine American democracy. But both theories, at least as I read the evidence, have ended up assigning too much conspiratorial agency to their domestic enemies, and too little to the Russians themselves. The anti-Trump side looked at how eagerly the Trump campaign responded to the 2016 email hacks and WikiLeaks dumps and assumed, they must be in cahoots with Putin. And now the pro-Trump side looks at the misinformation and motivated reasoning involved in the inception of the Russia investigation and assumes, they must have known that this was a fake story from the start. But in both cases, it’s quite possible that the only self-conscious Machiavellians were the Russians; it was their conspiracy, in which both Republicans and Democrats collaborated as marks. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/02/opinion/conspiracy-theories-epstein-russia.html Bottom line: - Russia did try to "influence" the election by making Hillary look bad (and in a 2-person race, by definition make Trump look good) - Trump's people eagerly played cheerleader - When it became clear that Trump's people (Manafort, Don Jr.) got a little too cozy with Russian assets, the Democrats eagerly played cheerleader - Politics is a dirty game Remember, Trump wasn't impeached over "Russia, Russia, Russia." It turns out that Russia did try to influence the election, and Trump's campaign was involved in a couple of ham-handed efforts at lending support ("collusion"), but, as the Mueller Report concluded years ago, that never amounted to much. Democrats had more than enough to genuinely believe that there was more there, but they also understood that simply the implication that there was more there was helpful to their cause. No one is pure as the driven lake-effect snow here, and that includes Trump.

I'll be loving you always With a love that's true always When the things you've planned need a helpin' hand I will understand always, always

Here's a video from the birthday announcement at the Hall of Fame ceremony. https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/general/thurman-thomas-leads-a-birthday-tribute-for-marv-levy/vi-AA1JMUUL#details

I will give you friendly action with a gentleman's bet that zero Bills players are on the stage It's not the new anthem of the bills despite how hard some people want it to be

They won't defend anything no matter what level of proof exists. As someone said recently, you can open a duffel bag full of heads and show them.... They. Will. Not. Care. It's all just right back to great orange menace. Followed shortly by accusations that YOU are deflecting. Wash, rinse, repeat.