All Activity

Never like that is it cheapened the record. If sacks were counted before 1982 Deacon Jones would have the record with 26 sacks in 1967 (in 14 games).

Urb is a middle name. Honest is the first name.

You might need X to see all the comments but the poster moves the goal posts from "suggesting" to " no one was actually put on one" when they were shown all the people, in luding politicians suggesting it. But I am supposed to be worried about Trump being an Autocrat

Yeah I will also admit to having a bias against RB numbers because they are SO reliant on those around them. I was talking about "premium" positions on TSW when the idea really hadn't been established in the NFL vocabulary yet. It's obvious that edge/island positions are more able to impact games with one-on-one dominance and those stats generally reflect more "individual" impact than those accumulated by a RB who needs so many things around them to go right to be great. See 2023 Giants Saquon versus 2024 Eagles Saquon. DE is a premium position. Strahan is the 10th leading sacker all-time. Thomas is the 16th leading rusher. In the postseason Strahan played better than he did in the regular season. Thurman in the playoffs was about the same player he was on any given Sunday, statistically. He had the great SB XXV and the awful XXVIII.

Meh, it’s the same reason Adrian Peterson is remembered so fondly. Those guys were 1 man offenses on teams with much less star power than the 90s Bills. It’s just cannibalism of nostalgia. How many players can the average fan name from those teams

Yeah, it’s the reason why expectations should be tempered for an Elijah Moore. Guys who bounce around multiple teams rarely put it all together on their fourth or fifth stop. Not saying it can’t happen, but it’s unlikely.

It's like writing a book report without even reading the cliff notes though. You caught enough grief though and that's usually the first conclusion people automatically jump too so I get it.

OPEC+ to boost oil production by 548,000 barrels per day in August by Associated Press Eight members of the OPEC+ alliance of oil exporting countries say they will boost production by 548,000 barrels per day in August in a move that could further reduce gas prices this year. The group that includes Saudi Arabia and Russia made the decision at a virtual meeting Saturday. They cited a “steady global economic outlook” and low oil inventories. Oil prices spiked sharply last month during the bloody, 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran but then tumbled back down as the U.S. helped broker a peace deal after dropping bombs on three of Iran’s key nuclear sites. https://apnews.com/article/opec-boosts-oil-production-891365fcd8f487c4d5f4d2dab1868c78?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=share

Those owners can just go eat their tickets when demand falls.

Only if you’re strictly measuring in financial return. A return on investment can also be measured in utility, value, and personal enjoyment. To use a real property appraisal analogy, if you install an in ground pool in your backyard, is that an investment? Probably not unless there’s mass neighborhood conformity. BUT, it is an investment in terms of your family’s use, enjoyment; and memories being created. Same principle for ‘investing’ in PSls and season tickets. There’s a return from the enjoyment.

It's 2025. Everyone is an expert on everything!

Let’s get this thing to 88 pages for baby Knox

I thoroughly enjoyed this. Thank you for sharing

May I suggest you stop digging, and step away from the shovel. It wasn’t just referenced in one obscure moment with the press, it has been a topic that has been discussed since the draft. But it’s just fine if you are not aware of it, there are no pop quizzes here. The problem is with sharing your accusatory views without bothering to become informed. Read/listen, then post tends to work better than posting negative stuff and then pleading ignorance, especially after being made aware that you are ill-informed. Of course the civil suit will wait until after he signs his contract. If you were her attorney, or even just a concerned uncle with a functioning brain, that’s what you would advise, right? .

There is currently zero incentive for fiscal responsibility in government. If anyone cuts any program then people freak out and you lose your next election. You get elected by promising to give away more money towards whatever cause, not take away. Why would anyone in government want to do the right thing in that case? It would be political suicide

This is an example of why zoning and building codes are important. The freedom lovers hate them, so you end up with innocent people dying. Texas and every other state needs to review where it allows people to build homes. Flash flood prone areas are especially dangerous as seen here, and in NC last year.

Everyone wants fiscal responsibility until something near and dear to them is targeted to be cut. That's why we're headed for the biggest fiscal disaster and financial emergency in human history.

Why would this be the case? I would think the opposite. The Left hates Elon and anyone who was undecided swayed towards the Republicans this time around. This would be bad for the R's aka the side with common sense currently

DUDE . I'm not on here all the time matter of fact I was in Canada for 3 weeks and I never went on this sight so how about y'all cutting me some freakin slack I don't love , eat, sleep on two Bills drive like apparently some here do . But god forbid I should miss 1 press conference over a month ago and in a situation that usually is a gold digger looking to make money and even in this one isn't it convenient that this is being brought up again AFTER he signed his contract JUST SAYING ... So please excuse me I'll try to engulf my being in the Bills so I don't make the same mistake again ...