Magox Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 I doubt any foul play was involved. Look who's wrong again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 Say whatever the hell you want. This lynching was perpetrated by filthy, low-class, ignorant back-woods rednecks and you're an asshat if you want to defend them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 Say whatever the hell you want. This lynching was perpetrated by filthy, low-class, ignorant back-woods rednecks and you're an asshat if you want to defend them. You would make a great jury member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 Look who the asshat is ^ In Gene's defense, we don't know that the census worker wasn't an ignorant backwoods redneck himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 Thee Nuh Yawhk Times says, it's a suicide. “We believe this was an intentional act,” Trooper Don Trosper, a Kentucky State Police spokesman, said. “We believe the aim was to take his own life.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 Say whatever the hell you want. This lynching was perpetrated by filthy, low-class, ignorant back-woods rednecks and you're an asshat if you want to defend them. Care to retract that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 Care to retract that? Those filthy, low-class, ignorant back-woods rednecks weren't guilty...this time. [/Gene Frenkle] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 Those filthy, low-class, ignorant back-woods rednecks weren't guilty...this time. [/Gene Frenkle] Thank heaven! Oh, and put a space after your ellipsis there young fella, and pinky up when sipping during High Tea! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 "Our job is to determine if there was foul play involved — and that's part of the investigation — and if there was foul play involved, whether that is related to his employment as a Census worker," said Beyer. I doubt any foul play was involved. Steely chokes again. (I can't make this joke enough.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 You see, The Big Cat cries because he feels that America is no longer exceptional at anything, and this thread proves that as a country we are particularly exceptional at coming to illogical conclusions and casting blame faster than anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Look who the asshat is ^ Yep, I was wrong. Not the first time and not the last time. I should know better than to jump to conclusions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Those filthy, low-class, ignorant back-woods rednecks weren't guilty...this time. [/Gene Frenkle] After living in NYS for 20 years, I enjoyed being around those ignorant back woods rednecks in Mississippi- they actually were friendlier than the people I grew up with. Pretty smart too- sorry, I know that doesn't fit the stereotype Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Yep, I was wrong. Not the first time and not the last time. I should know better than to jump to conclusions. Is it possible you might reconsider jumping to conclusions based on race and geographical location the next time? Seriously, not busting balls, just an honest question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Is it possible you might reconsider jumping to conclusions based on race and geographical location the next time? Seriously, not busting balls, just an honest question. Anyone else want to pile on? Dosn't really change how I feel about the region. They didn't kill the census worker, a feather in their collective cap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Anyone else want to pile on? Dosn't really change how I feel about the region. They didn't kill the census worker, a feather in their collective cap. We disagreed on this the first time around. Hardly piling on, and was meant in a hopefully positive way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Anyone else want to pile on? Dosn't really change how I feel about the region. They didn't kill the census worker, a feather in their collective cap. I'd be willing to bet that the people in the region don't need a condescending rush-to-judgement look-down-your-nose liberal snot like yourself awarding them 'feathers in their collective cap' if for no other reason that it is very likely beneath them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 I'd be willing to bet that the people in the region don't need a condescending rush-to-judgement look-down-your-nose liberal snot like yourself awarding them 'feathers in their collective cap' if for no other reason that it is very likely beneath them. But as a liberal, he's probably got extra feathers in his cap. So, again as a liberal, he's just fulfilling the liberal goal of redistribution of feathers. Not like those robber-barons on Wall Street who hoard feathers and keep half the country feather-poor. You know what this country needs? A "Let Wall Street Pay For The Restoration Of Main Street's Hat Feathers Act," to bring us more in line with Scandanavian feather equality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drnykterstein Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 I hate when you idiots think you've won something. Because the problem is that you are still idiots. Whether you are right or wrong, that fact has not changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frit0 Bandit0 Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 I'd be willing to bet that the people in the region don't need a condescending rush-to-judgement look-down-your-nose liberal snot like yourself awarding them 'feathers in their collective cap' if for no other reason that it is very likely beneath them. Gene don't like red states.. McCain won with over 57% of the vote so "Kentucky bad" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drnykterstein Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 You know what this country needs? A "Let Wall Street Pay For The Restoration Of Main Street's Hat Feathers Act," to bring us more in line with Scandanavian feather equality. Dems are trying to do just that. http://thehill.com//homenews/house/69295-d...-150b-stock-tax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts