stuckincincy Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 Here are the President's comments: http://www.edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/0...ride/index.html There's the answer to insurance coverage. Claim you are gay, find an employed person with benefits, and glom off that person's employer. Perhaps kick over 50 bucks a month to your mythical partner to keep the scam alive. Gaming the US federal government is so easy... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 I celebrated LGBTPM by slappin' the ol' Louisville Slugger around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 Here are the President's comments: http://www.edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/0...ride/index.html There's the answer to insurance coverage. Claim you are gay, find an employed person with benefits, and glom off that person's employer. Perhaps kick over 50 bucks a month to your mythical partner to keep the scam alive. Gaming the US federal government is so easy... And straight people can't do this? Get a friend of the opposite sex, take a quick trip to the courthouse, and all of a sudden you have tax benefits, insurance benefits, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted July 1, 2009 Author Share Posted July 1, 2009 And straight people can't do this? Get a friend of the opposite sex, take a quick trip to the courthouse, and all of a sudden you have tax benefits, insurance benefits, etc. Yes - but there you have the legal, if not the moral, commitment of marriage. Such an arrangement of convenience has entailing ramifications. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 I live about a hundred yards from the epicenter of "Boystown" in Chicago (I also live about a block and a half away from Wrigley, strange dichotomy indeed). Suffice to say, I went golfing Sunday. I got the f-ck out of dodge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 Yes - but there you have the legal, if not the moral, commitment of marriage. Such an arrangement of convenience has entailing ramifications. So let gays get married, and then it won't be an issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 I went to the bar and honored the guys, about to sit at the bar, by offering to push in their stool for them. Shouldn't have done that. Opened a whole Pandora's box that would have been better left closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 So let gays get married, and then it won't be an issue. So let's get married, in a big cathedral by a priest, cuz if I'm the man you love the most, well you can say 'I do,' at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted July 1, 2009 Author Share Posted July 1, 2009 So let gays get married, and then it won't be an issue. Since you seem open-minded, how about polygamy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typical TBD Guy Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 Since you seem open-minded, how about polygamy? How about keeping the government out of marriage altogether? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 I say let the buttpluggers legally buttplug. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 Here are the President's comments: http://www.edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/0...ride/index.html There's the answer to insurance coverage. Claim you are gay, find an employed person with benefits, and glom off that person's employer. Perhaps kick over 50 bucks a month to your mythical partner to keep the scam alive. Gaming the US federal government is so easy... I got you a card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 Yes - but there you have the legal, if not the moral, commitment of marriage. Such an arrangement of convenience has entailing ramifications. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted July 1, 2009 Author Share Posted July 1, 2009 I got you a card. How sweet of you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 I opened a DOS prompted and typed C Colon Enter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 How did you celebrate, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Pride Month ?? You put them in the closet!! The only think I have against gays is their flaunting it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StupidNation Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 I lubed up some broom sticks with quick acting apoxy and gave them their deepest desires. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 I lubed up some broom sticks with quick acting apoxy and gave them their deepest desires. Dude, TMI. What you do on your personal time should stay that way IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 Since you seem open-minded, how about polygamy? Don't care, as long as all the partners do it of their own free will and are at least 18, as opposed to some of those cult-like compounds where girls under 18 are put in arraigned marriages to old men. It's a shame that people like Lt. Dan Choi, an Arabic-speaking officer who served for 15 months in Iraq as a member of Fort Drum's 10th Mountain Division before joining a New York National Guard unit based in Manhattan, are recommended for dismissal from the military just because of public knowledge of his orientation, yet people like Gov. Sanford are allowed to keep their jobs. http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/200...mends_disc.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 Its written that gays are not allowed in the military. Its NOT written that philanderers are not allowed to be Governors. He broke the code (right or wrong) and got kicked out. Hes got ZERO case. NONE. Gays are allowed, they just can't admit they're gay. I never said the action wasn't legal, I said it was a shame. Forcing a brave veteran to leave while allowing a lovelorn unstable Governor to stay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 Gays are allowed, they just can't admit they're gay. I never said the action wasn't legal, I said it was a shame. Forcing a brave veteran to leave while allowing a lovelorn unstable Governor to stay. Get with the program. It's 2009. Being heterosexual is far more of an advantage to US military operations than being able to speak Arabic. :wallbash: :wallbash: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 Gays are allowed, they just can't admit they're gay. I never said the action wasn't legal, I said it was a shame. Forcing a brave veteran to leave while allowing a lovelorn unstable Governor to stay. Then why didn't you want Bubba to quit? He had sex in the office during office hours. Sexual harassment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 Get with the program. It's 2009. Being heterosexual is far more of an advantage to US military operations than being able to speak Arabic. :wallbash: Being able to say "hi there,big guy" in Arabic is not the same as being a translator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 So let's get married, in a big cathedral by a priest, cuz if I'm the man you love the most, well you can say 'I do,' at least. Amazing! A post by TBC that I actually enjoyed. At the Hotel Yorba I'll be glad to see ya later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 Here are the President's comments: http://www.edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/0...ride/index.html There's the answer to insurance coverage. Claim you are gay, find an employed person with benefits, and glom off that person's employer. Perhaps kick over 50 bucks a month to your mythical partner to keep the scam alive. Gaming the US federal government is so easy... Hmm, I spy a movie plot. Could make millions. Maybe cast someone like Adam Sandler & Kevin James. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 Then why didn't you want Bubba to quit? He had sex in the office during office hours. Sexual harassment. Consensual sex between adults isn't harassment. Bubba didn't have a problem with gays in the military like Republicans do. He took it as far as was politically feasible at the time with 'don't ask, don't tell', and still got political flack for just that interim step. And of course Sanford called for Bubba to resign, but won't do the same himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 Then why didn't you want Bubba to quit? He had sex in the office during office hours. Sexual harassment. 1) That's not sexual harrassment. 2) As I recall, Clinton was actually working. Wasn't he on the phone with Congressional leadership during one of his trysts? 3) As I recall, you were solidly in the "The president is ALWAYS on the clock" camp during every "Bush takes too many vacations" whine and B word session. So the president should NEVER have sex, because he's always working, and therefore stealing from the American taxpayer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMadCap Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 Don't care, as long as all the partners do it of their own free will and are at least 18, as opposed to some of those cult-like compounds where girls under 18 are put in arraigned marriages to old men. It's a shame that people like Lt. Dan Choi, an Arabic-speaking officer who served for 15 months in Iraq as a member of Fort Drum's 10th Mountain Division before joining a New York National Guard unit based in Manhattan, are recommended for dismissal from the military just because of public knowledge of his orientation, yet people like Gov. Sanford are allowed to keep their jobs. http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/200...mends_disc.html Just wondering, is this the guy that came out knowing that he would be kicked out if he did so? I think I saw him on one of those TV shows my F-IN-L watches, and he watches MSNBC. IF that is in fact the person in question, although I don't give a rat's ass if he's gay or not, if he was DUMB enough to do what they said not to do, then he gets no sympathy from me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 Consensual sex between adults isn't harassment. Bubba didn't have a problem with gays in the military like Republicans do. He took it as far as was politically feasible at the time with 'don't ask, don't tell', and still got political flack for just that interim step. And of course Sanford called for Bubba to resign, but won't do the same himself. Your blindness is remarkable. He was her Superior,and in a position to cause her to lose her job if she didn't comply. Check workplace laws before you issue one of your automated responses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 Your blindness is remarkable. He was her Superior,and in a position to cause her to lose her job if she didn't comply. Check workplace laws before you issue one of your automated responses. Check your facts. What proof do you have that he forced her or intimidated her to do anything? Did she file for sexual harassment? Did she even make a claim of harassment after it was public? No. It was consensual sex between adults. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 Check your facts. What proof do you have that he forced her or intimidated her to do anything? Did she file for sexual harassment? Did she even make a claim of harassment after it was public? No. It was consensual sex between adultsDemocrats. Updated with PJ's rationale Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 Your blindness is remarkable. He was her Superior,and in a position to cause her to lose her job if she didn't comply. Check workplace laws before you issue one of your automated responses. Check workplace laws yourself. That is not the definition of sexual harrassment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 Check workplace laws yourself. That is not the definition of sexual harrassment. WHAT PART OF HE WAS HER BOSS are you missing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 Check your facts. What proof do you have that he forced her or intimidated her to do anything? Did she file for sexual harassment? Did she even make a claim of harassment after it was public? No. It was consensual sex between adults. He did it in the office. If he did it upstairs in the private quarters in the evening, that's different. Go and screw one of your employees in your office and have the boss find out- see how long you last. Democrats can murder someone (Ted Kennedy), rape someone (Slick Willie - Juanita Broderick (remember"Put some ice on it?) or be an officer in a racist organization (Robert KKK Byrd ) and nothing happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 WHAT PART OF HE WAS HER BOSS are you missing? That's not part of the definition of sexual harrassment. You're probably confusing it with the laws several states have concerning HS teachers dating students (i.e.: they can't, even if the student is of legal age and consents.) But having consensual sexual relations with your boss is not harassment by the boss. You're more than welcome to look it up. Under federal jurisdiction, the EEOC is the enforcing body. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts