BuffaloRebound Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 I don't think Marv would trade up unless it is a player at a need position. It's gotta be a LT or DT they are targeting at the end of the 1st round. If Ferguson is not their at #8, then it's probably Ngata, then Winston at #26. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuklz2594 Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 take lendale white late in the first round to motivate wm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2003Contenders Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 Maybe there is a CB they like there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N.Y. Orangeman Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 Probably off, but, if rumors are correct (yeah, I know...), Marv might be thinking about Cutler at #11 and is seeking OL help at #26. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 why? 672100[/snapback] I bet it's contingent on us trading down from #8 and aquiring extra picks. I can't see us giving up a 2nd and one of our 3rds to move up for anyone late in Round 1, leaving us with only 1 more day 1 pick. We need too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartshan-83 Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 This just sounds kinda funny. I can hear the Bears brass now. "Dropping to 41 would be fine, but 42, what are !@#$ing kidding me? Who wants to pick that late?" 672147[/snapback] No sh--...my thoughts exactly! This smacks of Clayton just making something up. They say that this has been one of the hardest drafts in memory to predict. The 3 QBs are all wildcards, no one knows where DBrick is going and there was even doubt about the hottest prospect ever, Reggie Bush, going 1st. Buuuuuuut...somehow the Bears know that they guy they want will last to #40 or 41, but not 42. Get a new job Johnny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 take lendale white late in the first round to motivate wm 672324[/snapback] Who would motivate Lendale? P.S. Did Lendale motivate Willis when he overcame what could have been a career ending injury? P.P.S Did Lendale motivate Willis to be the fastest Bills RB to gain 2,000 yards (even though he was playing behind a piss poor line)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnTheRocks Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 I see that 2007 #1 being dangled. 672107[/snapback] man...that would really piss me off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnTheRocks Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 they could be crossing their fingers that Bunkley will fall to #26 and they can take Ngata and Bunkley. the possibilities are endless! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartyBall4Buffalo Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 Possible reasons wr- Santonio Holmes te- Leonard Pope or Marcedes Lewis ot- Winston, McNeil og- davin jospeh c- nick mangold lb- Bobby Carpenter de- Kiwanuka, Hali dt- Gabe Watson, John McCargo cb- antonio cromartie (I wish but he'll probably be gone before 27) tye hill, s- Jimmy williams(I know he was a corner he's a safety in the nfl though) Jason Allen, Donte Whitner, KO Simpson some of these guys will probably be gone, but one of them could be the reason. My guess is either winston, mccargo or a safety. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acantha Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 Who would motivate Lendale? P.S. Did Lendale motivate Willis when he overcame what could have been a career ending injury? P.P.S Did Lendale motivate Willis to be the fastest Bills RB to gain 2,000 yards (even though he was playing behind a piss poor line)? 672381[/snapback] You tell him!!! PPPSSSS Did he motivate Willis to ALL 5 of his TD's last season????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffalo mike2 Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 they could be crossing their fingers that Bunkley will fall to #26 and they can take Ngata and Bunkley. the possibilities are endless! 672396[/snapback] Bunklet a DE, Ngata at nose. BRILLIANT!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 ...This doesnt make too much sense. Maybe if the Bears were picking in the top 15 I could see it, but who in the heck would the Bills want in the late first? 672113[/snapback] Mangold? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 I would be on board with the move if Tamba Hali was still available at that point. Something tells me that this guy will be a very productive pass rusher for many years. It is surprising to me that his stock has fallen so far after once being considered a top 10-15 pick.If we could start the draft with DaBrick and Hali, I would be very pleased. 672135[/snapback] I think Hali's too much of a tweener, so I hope that's not where they're going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acantha Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 Bunklet a DE, Ngata at nose. BRILLIANT!!!!!! 672407[/snapback] As impossible as that is....THAT would be something I could get behind. Aaron, Ngata, Tripplett, Bunkley?? Holy crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
millstone twnsp nj bills fan Posted April 28, 2006 Share Posted April 28, 2006 Manigold 672118[/snapback] BINGO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max997 Posted April 28, 2006 Share Posted April 28, 2006 KFFL is reporting: Bills | Talking potential trade with Bears Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:05:05 -0700 John Clayton, of ESPN.com, reports the Buffalo Bills are attempting to acquire a second first round pick. The Chicago Bears, who own the No. 26 pick, may be interested in dealing. KFFL NFL Hotwire Page 672098[/snapback] I think the trade being discussed is actually the Bills moving up from their 2nd round pick rather then down from their first round pick Chicago gave up a 3rd round pick to Carolina when they signed Ricky Manning Jr so the talk is they would like to pick up another pick(s) to make up for that pick...dont know if I like this trade idea for the Bills unless they are able to trade down and pick up another 2nd then I like it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tipster19 Posted April 28, 2006 Share Posted April 28, 2006 IF this were to be true, could coupling the #8 and #26 picks be a more inexpensive way to move up to the #2 pick overall? Ooh, Saturday can't come soon enough! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max997 Posted April 28, 2006 Share Posted April 28, 2006 IF this were to be true, could coupling the #8 and #26 picks be a more inexpensive way to move up to the #2 pick overall? Ooh, Saturday can't come soon enough! 672519[/snapback] I dont think they would make the trade for 26 until the bears were on the clock....I also only think they make this trade if they end up trading down in the first round and getting additional pick(s) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndyJay1234 Posted April 28, 2006 Share Posted April 28, 2006 you are correct sir 672256[/snapback] It makes me wonder if they take Huff at 8 and then pull this. The defense would be pretty much fixed and it got a heck of a loy younger in one season. It does not address the o-line but with yesterdays signing and Fowler...... makes me wonder. Huff is the last of the supposed elite 8. Sorry. This was in response to picking the DT Josh McCargo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted April 28, 2006 Share Posted April 28, 2006 As impossible as that is....THAT would be something I could get behind. Aaron, Ngata, Tripplett, Bunkley?? Holy crap. 672413[/snapback] That could be something an entire city could get behind, literally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in Chicago Posted April 28, 2006 Share Posted April 28, 2006 That could be something an entire city could get behind, literally. 672719[/snapback] Made my morning ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndyJay1234 Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 The name: John McCargo occupation: Defensive Tackle reason: The Bills won't be forced to take a Defensive Tackle with the 8th pick. The Bills don't like Bunkley because of character issues and Ngata isn't the type of DT the Bills want in their new scheme. John McCargo on the other hand would be a perfect, PERFECT fit in the Bills new scheme. 672210[/snapback] good call on the prediction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firstngoal Posted April 30, 2006 Share Posted April 30, 2006 good call on the prediction 675494[/snapback] Thank You! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted April 30, 2006 Share Posted April 30, 2006 The name: John McCargo occupation: Defensive Tackle reason: The Bills won't be forced to take a Defensive Tackle with the 8th pick. The Bills don't like Bunkley because of character issues and Ngata isn't the type of DT the Bills want in their new scheme. John McCargo on the other hand would be a perfect, PERFECT fit in the Bills new scheme. 672210[/snapback] Great call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts