MarlinTheMagician Posted Saturday at 06:32 PM Posted Saturday at 06:32 PM Even though we could run with Thurman, they recognized Kelly could gash them with Lofton, Reed and Beebe. They decided - better Thurman average 7 or more a carry than be shot dead by the K-Gun. Giants used either a 2-5-4 or a 2-4-5 on many of the snaps. I feel we should be similarly creative, even if we don't use exactly what the Giants used against us or don't stay in the formations long. We need to mix it up, get Burrow off his spot once in a while, and manufacture pressure by sending different rushers from different angles of attack. In an average NFL game a defense gets 7-8 stops. I feel if we can get 5 stops, by turnover or punt, we win. I don't care how bad we look on the 5-6 possessions where we don't get a stop. We have to win on D sometimes, not all the times. 1 Quote
Fr. Jerk Posted Saturday at 06:35 PM Posted Saturday at 06:35 PM Whenever I see highlights I close my eyes, stick my fingers in my ears and pretend the kick is good, ya dig? 2 2 5 1 Quote
MarlinTheMagician Posted Saturday at 06:41 PM Author Posted Saturday at 06:41 PM 2 minutes ago, Fr. Jerk said: Whenever I see highlights I close my eyes, stick my fingers in my ears and pretend the kick is good, ya dig? I dig more than you know! I was there, but lived in New York at the time. For 20+ years my friends in New York, who were all Giants fans, sent me a Christmas card saying "Merry Christmas - I am so sorry I missed that kick." Signed: "Happy Holidays, Scott Norwood." Return address was always "The North Pole" - never did find out which of the miscreants was responsible. 1 3 Quote
WeckMonster Posted Saturday at 06:42 PM Posted Saturday at 06:42 PM Agree on need to change the look for Burrow. It’s been fish in a barrel for him against us. Unfortunately LT, Carl Banks and Pepper Johnson aren’t walking through that door. 1 Quote
MarlinTheMagician Posted Saturday at 06:46 PM Author Posted Saturday at 06:46 PM (edited) 4 minutes ago, WeckMonster said: Agree on need to change the look for Burrow. It’s been fish in a barrel for him against us. Unfortunately LT, Carl Banks and Pepper Johnson aren’t walking through that door. Agree! Sadly. But we can put some pretty good athletes out there in the look - Williams, Shaq, Milano - mix in Buffalo Joe or Cam depending on whether you want to be a little heavier or a little faster at that moment. I will die if we sit in our usual zone and its fish-in-barrel time again. As Teddy Roosevelt said (in substance) in "Man in the Arena" - Better to live greatly and fail than to never have lived at all! Edited Saturday at 06:46 PM by MarlinTheMagician Quote
Fr. Jerk Posted Saturday at 07:10 PM Posted Saturday at 07:10 PM 23 minutes ago, MarlinTheMagician said: I dig more than you know! I was there, but lived in New York at the time. For 20+ years my friends in New York, who were all Giants fans, sent me a Christmas card saying "Merry Christmas - I am so sorry I missed that kick." Signed: "Happy Holidays, Scott Norwood." Return address was always "The North Pole" - never did find out which of the miscreants was responsible. That's funny. I don't think the postal service allows fake return addresses anymore, or doesn't deliver if they catch it. Whenever I used to mail friends gag gifts I would make out the return address as: Hulk Hogan 1 Big Legdrop Avenue Venice Beach, CA 50187 A recent package didn't get delivered to my friend. Also, it might be because Terry is dead, ya dig? 1 Quote
gonzo1105 Posted Saturday at 07:24 PM Posted Saturday at 07:24 PM People act like that should have been a given superbowl and yes its probably the 1 out of 4 they should have won especially with them playing Hostetler instead of Simms but people forget that the Bills and Giants actually played earlier that season and the Bills only won that game 17-13. The Giants had a good game plan for the Bills in the regular season and giving Parcells and Belichick an extra week plus the Giants offense putting up more than 13 was the difference between the Super Bowl and the regular season game. Quote
Ray Stonada Posted Saturday at 07:25 PM Posted Saturday at 07:25 PM (edited) Hard to run a 2-5 with our LB crew! But I agree this is a good time to break out the McD dime package which we used against KC. Dorian Williams delayed rush Benford blitz from the blindside with Hairston waiting to pick up his man Stuff like that Edited Saturday at 07:25 PM by Ray Stonada Autocorrect grrr 2 Quote
Marcus Aurelius Posted Saturday at 07:57 PM Posted Saturday at 07:57 PM 1 hour ago, MarlinTheMagician said: Even though we could run with Thurman, they recognized Kelly could gash them with Lofton, Reed and Beebe. They decided - better Thurman average 7 or more a carry than be shot dead by the K-Gun. Giants used either a 2-5-4 or a 2-4-5 on many of the snaps. I feel we should be similarly creative, even if we don't use exactly what the Giants used against us or don't stay in the formations long. We need to mix it up, get Burrow off his spot once in a while, and manufacture pressure by sending different rushers from different angles of attack. In an average NFL game a defense gets 7-8 stops. I feel if we can get 5 stops, by turnover or punt, we win. I don't care how bad we look on the 5-6 possessions where we don't get a stop. We have to win on D sometimes, not all the times. OH THE HUMANITY 3 Quote
machine gun kelly Posted Saturday at 08:04 PM Posted Saturday at 08:04 PM Have fun guys as I’m not running through this again after 34 years, the six days before I moved her to tampa for that SB, and suffered through that loss across the street at the Tampa Mall with a movie screen and radio station vans. There were by game time 11-14,000 fans across from the Sombrero. Enjoy the debate. If you feel we should at time be a cover defense, not attacking, no argument, including tomorrow. We should win. Quote
BillsPride12 Posted Saturday at 08:10 PM Posted Saturday at 08:10 PM 41 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said: People act like that should have been a given superbowl and yes its probably the 1 out of 4 they should have won especially with them playing Hostetler instead of Simms but people forget that the Bills and Giants actually played earlier that season and the Bills only won that game 17-13. The Giants had a good game plan for the Bills in the regular season and giving Parcells and Belichick an extra week plus the Giants offense putting up more than 13 was the difference between the Super Bowl and the regular season game. I still think the Bills were the better team and should have won the game but that Giants team was really good and I think sometimes that gets lost in the mix because they upset San Fran and won the game on a missed kick. If anything that Giants team is probably underrated in the annals of NFL history Quote
Dan Darragh Posted Saturday at 08:18 PM Posted Saturday at 08:18 PM Do we even carry 5 LBs who can walk? 1 2 Quote
gomper Posted Saturday at 10:24 PM Posted Saturday at 10:24 PM I know more about XXV than any rational Bills fan should. Without getting into it again, the blame falls on the D. NY TOP 41:34. 9/16 on 3rd downs. They had them in the 1st half. A few drives up 10-3 and then 12-3. Still hurts. 1 Quote
MarlinTheMagician Posted Saturday at 11:13 PM Author Posted Saturday at 11:13 PM You people have PTSD!! I am not trying to dredge up discussion of that game! (But perhaps I should have realized I would). I am saying, given our shorthanded defense, we need to really mix it up to generate some stops (because I think we are unlikely to get many if we sit in our base nickel). Giants were the best example I could think of where a D played outside its usual structure to throw-off a lethal offense. Quote
Kelly to Allen Posted Saturday at 11:35 PM Posted Saturday at 11:35 PM (edited) Beebe didn't play. He got hurt in the week 16 Miami game. Al Edwards replaced him. It was a sneaky Injury because defenses couldn't matchup with two great deep threats, Lofton on one side, Beebe on the other...Edwards was pretty decent tho. Bills has Tasker obviously for depth and also used Don Smith as a slot type backup wr This allowed Reed, Thomas, & McKeller to be matched up on slower lbs back then and it was almost impossible to adjust when they were going no huddle. This is why bellicheat put 8-9 in covg and purposely let buffalo run. For 3 reasons 1. You shorten the game. You can only score 1 TD per possession. Make the other team go 12-15 plays 2. Betting on the bills impatience with the run & short passing game because of their incredible success the last two playoffs games. 95 pts in 2 games 3. Punishment of the bills wrs. You put 8-9 guys in covg and back then you could destroy wrs and basically mug them. The pats with bellicheat had a similar game plan vs the 2001 rams with Holt, Bruce & Faulk Edited yesterday at 12:09 AM by Kelly to Allen Quote
SC STATE NUPE Posted Saturday at 11:43 PM Posted Saturday at 11:43 PM (edited) What makes Burrow so hard to defend is that he’s easily the best anticipatory passer in the league! Dude just puts the ball in the air and the receivers just have to be in certain spots. Bills must score 40 to win this game tomorrow. This game is gonna be hard because they’re gonna stress the defense and be very aggressive going for it on 4th down a lot. We might need to have the field littered with corners and safeties, because I have no faith that they’ll generate pressure and get to him. Burrow kills us with those little quick passes. I’m still trying to figure out how you defend those?😂 Edited Saturday at 11:44 PM by SC STATE NUPE 1 1 Quote
Kelly to Allen Posted Saturday at 11:49 PM Posted Saturday at 11:49 PM 5 minutes ago, SC STATE NUPE said: What makes Burrow so hard to defend is that he’s easily the best anticipatory passer in the league! Dude just puts the ball in the air and the receivers just have to be in certain spots. Bills must score 40 to win this game tomorrow. This game is gonna be hard because they’re gonna stress the defense and be very aggressive going for it on 4th down a lot. We might need to have the field littered with corners and safeties, because I have no faith that they’ll generate pressure and get to him. Burrow kills us with those little quick passes. I’m still trying to figure out how you defend those?😂 Yup. Burrow reminds me the most of Tom Brady if he can stay healthy. Quote
Mr. WEO Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 19 hours ago, WeckMonster said: Agree on need to change the look for Burrow. It’s been fish in a barrel for him against us. Unfortunately LT, Carl Banks and Pepper Johnson aren’t walking through that door. Burrow barely completed half his passes last week. Bengals have the worst running and passing defenses in the league. It won't matter if Glass Toe Joe gets his 1 or 2 TDs. If Brady can't scheme for this joke of a Defense then he needs to be fired postgame. Quote
BuffaloBillyG Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 19 hours ago, MarlinTheMagician said: Even though we could run with Thurman, they recognized Kelly could gash them with Lofton, Reed and Beebe. They decided - better Thurman average 7 or more a carry than be shot dead by the K-Gun. Giants used either a 2-5-4 or a 2-4-5 on many of the snaps. I feel we should be similarly creative, even if we don't use exactly what the Giants used against us or don't stay in the formations long. We need to mix it up, get Burrow off his spot once in a while, and manufacture pressure by sending different rushers from different angles of attack. In an average NFL game a defense gets 7-8 stops. I feel if we can get 5 stops, by turnover or punt, we win. I don't care how bad we look on the 5-6 possessions where we don't get a stop. We have to win on D sometimes, not all the times. During the brief blip that was Hoecht's season, Buffalo changed the look up a ton. And they changed it in ways I hadn't seen while he was out on suspension and haven't seen since. That 2 DE, no DT look they ran worked very well. Unfortunately, I haven't seen them run it since Hoecht went down. I'd like for them to try and bring it back as they do have guys I think could do ok there in AJE and Dorian Williams. Maybe Morgan Fox can do it. Who knows. Point being, I think they have a good chunk of their defensive playbook mothballed. This would be a good time to dial it up and cause some confusion. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.