Blank Stare Posted 50 minutes ago Posted 50 minutes ago 22 minutes ago, Psautcsk said: Morgan Fox? I agree. Your guess is as good as mine. Cannot fathom why they haven’t given him a shot with a PS elevation. Apparently, he’s a poor man’s version of Hoecht. At least he played the Hoecht role in LA before Hoecht. Seems like something worth trying. Quote
gobills1212 Posted 39 minutes ago Posted 39 minutes ago (edited) Man... how can someone be mad about a former SB champ at a depth signing?! I get it doesnt help the pass rush or catching passes (from Allen) but now people wanna come to Buffalo for a chance. Take it for what it is rather than complaining its not a fictional WR/DE that doesnt exist at this stage of the season. Some of you are acting like Beane had a choice of Jefferson or Chase and chose Slay instead. Then people are still acting like its a novel joke that hasnt already been made 50x in the previous 8 pages...Yikes Edited 37 minutes ago by gobills1212 1 Quote
Magox Posted 37 minutes ago Posted 37 minutes ago 2 hours ago, R.O. said: This is it. This is what the decision was about. Not whether or not he is better than Tre or someone who will crack the top 3. It was a decision the Bills made believing he is an upgrade over Ingram. Nothing more than that Quote
BeastMaster Posted 35 minutes ago Posted 35 minutes ago 35 minutes ago, RichRiderBills said: I think the team was really high on slay and they were really keen on the fact he was playing out of position or being asked to do things he wasn't necessarily great at. I think they might think he's an exceptional scheme fit. This is what I believe as well He is a man corner with diminishing skills, but that might make him a good fit potentially in a scheme that doesn't play man as much Quote
gtw3 Posted 32 minutes ago Posted 32 minutes ago How many years have we gone into the playoffs and been down or immediately lost one of our DBs or starting defensive players. I see no problem with bringing in a seasoned vet to provide quality depth. Maybe if we made a move like this in previous years we wouldn't have had to suffer through seeing Elam or Dane Jackson out there in the biggest game. Quote
Chicken Boo Posted 29 minutes ago Posted 29 minutes ago What's the over/under on a halftime retirement? 1 Quote
Buffalo Ballin Posted 24 minutes ago Posted 24 minutes ago He better not retire during half time. Despite that, this is a good signing late in the season. He's healthy. He's in game shape. We need help at defense anyway we can get it. Quote
4merper4mer Posted 20 minutes ago Posted 20 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said: What's the over/under on a halftime retirement? Halftime. Duh. Quote
ScotSHO Posted 17 minutes ago Posted 17 minutes ago This is an indication that we'll need to play more man to man on the back end because we're sending 5-6 people more often. Growing up a Jerry Glanville fan - I LOVE IT. Send the house, speed up the game, every play. But no Elvis tickets are required. Quote
Kelly to Allen Posted 16 minutes ago Posted 16 minutes ago After the AFC championship last year, I'm happy about this move Quote
JP51 Posted 11 minutes ago Posted 11 minutes ago 3 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said: We are playing more Dime and I think this takes Cam Lewis off the field. Or Taron Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.