Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, EmotionallyUnstable said:


If they held them to 19, they still would have lost without that flukey KOR. It that were the case and we went down 19-12, I think people would still be angry about the defense. In the same way you reference that McD has groomed fans to accept his defensive struggles, a section of fans will never rationally accept rational defense imperfection. Regardless, the offense was much bigger and continues to be a much bigger problem for this team Imo 

What if I told you the offense both scored more and gained more against the Texans than they give up on average😂😂

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

What if I told you the offense both scored more and gained more against the Texans than they give up on average😂😂

 

 

Then you’d be wrong because the offense scored 12 points and the Texans average 16.5 PPG 

Posted
Just now, EmotionallyUnstable said:

Then you’d be wrong because the offense scored 12 points and the Texans average 16.5 PPG 

Ok- season totals account for ST/defensive scores

 

And even discounting that, if we're going to say the Bills actually did hold the Texans under 20 we can just ask easily say they actually scored 16

Posted

Advanced stats and rich data show he's really good some say... Ya really gotta dig into the numbers, then you'll see! 

 

I'm old fashioned. I want my highly paid DL players to be obvious to dummies like me watching the game. Like Houstons DL were while they were hammering our QB all game. 

 

 

  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, TheFunPolice said:

Advanced stats and rich data show he's really good some say... Ya really gotta dig into the numbers, then you'll see! 

 

I'm old fashioned. I want my highly paid DL players to be obvious to dummies like me watching the game. Like Houstons DL were while they were hammering our QB all game. 

 

 

Groot isn't actually highly paid, though.  15th-highest this season and he will quickly slide down the list as other DEs sign new contracts.

6 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

Ok- season totals account for ST/defensive scores

 

And even discounting that, if we're going to say the Bills actually did hold the Texans under 20 we can just ask easily say they actually scored 16

Yes, which is why it came down to a final offensive possession at the end with the Bills having a chance to win.

 

That is how numbers work.

Posted
1 minute ago, TheFunPolice said:

Advanced stats and rich data show he's really good some say... Ya really gotta dig into the numbers, then you'll see! 

 

I'm old fashioned. I want my highly paid DL players to be obvious to dummies like me watching the game. Like Houstons DL were while they were hammering our QB all game. 

 

 

THE Ed Oliver stat "pass rush win rate"

 

Hate it. HATE it. Who cares if you beat your guy if you don't finish the play?

 

It's the participation award of stats 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Avisan said:

Groot isn't actually highly paid, though.  15th-highest this season and he will quickly slide down the list as other DEs sign new contracts.

 

Well ok then! 

 

All of our investments in draft picks and money in the DL and they're invisible unless you have an excel spreadsheet is my point. 

 

This has been the case year after year. It's not new. 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, TheFunPolice said:

Advanced stats and rich data show he's really good some say... Ya really gotta dig into the numbers, then you'll see! 

 

I'm old fashioned. I want my highly paid DL players to be obvious to dummies like me watching the game. Like Houstons DL were while they were hammering our QB all game. 

 

 

I don't think they show he's really good, they show he's not a problem

 

He's probably worth his contract...he's not an issue is the overall point. Decent player on a decent deal

2 minutes ago, Avisan said:

Groot isn't actually highly paid, though.  15th-highest this season and he will quickly slide down the list as other DEs sign new contracts.

Yes, which is why it came down to a final offensive possession at the end with the Bills having a chance to win.

 

That is how numbers work.

Are you trying to be condescending or something

 

I know how 'numbers work'

  • Agree 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

Are you trying to be condescending or something

 

I know how 'numbers work'

I'm mildly exasperated because you're arguing against yourself and don't realize it

 

The Bills D and O had similar days EXCEPT, prior to the final drive

 

-2 big turnovers on offense

-A big failed 4th down conversion that squandered one of the good offensive drives

 

This led to the Bills being in a one-score game where they needed a TD on their final drive to win it and unfortunately they couldn't come up with it.

 

Which is why people are dinging the offense, things looked ugly and unsustainable, and their net points squandered the production that they did have.

 

Meanwhile you're arguing that the defense was the problem, which is ????

Posted
8 minutes ago, Avisan said:

I'm mildly exasperated because you're arguing against yourself and don't realize it

 

The Bills D and O had similar days EXCEPT, prior to the final drive

 

-2 big turnovers on offense

-A big failed 4th down conversion that squandered one of the good offensive drives

 

This led to the Bills being in a one-score game where they needed a TD on their final drive to win it and unfortunately they couldn't come up with it.

 

Which is why people are dinging the offense, things looked ugly and unsustainable, and their net points squandered the production that they did have.

 

Meanwhile you're arguing that the defense was the problem, which is ????

like you, i do not think either side of the ball had a particularly good day

 

the difference (for me) is the offense going against arguably the best defense in the league, and the defense going against a bad offense w a backup QB

 

imo one of those units playing below average is noteworthy and the other is not 

Posted
8 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

like you, i do not think either side of the ball had a particularly good day

 

the difference (for me) is the offense going against arguably the best defense in the league, and the defense going against a bad offense w a backup QB

 

imo one of those units playing below average is noteworthy and the other is not 

I think both units had/allowed fairly "normal" production relative to expectation, but the offense had 3 big drive-ending errors, two of which gave the Texans points, and Allen took a beating in the process.  Not good.

Also, the Dawkins false start was infuriating.

Posted
Just now, Avisan said:

I think both units had/allowed fairly "normal" production relative to expectation, but the offense had 3 big drive-ending errors, two of which gave the Texans points, and Allen took a beating in the process.  Not good.

ok

im fine leaving it there

Posted
1 hour ago, Johnny Hammersticks said:

Yeah.  Complete slug.  Sacks aren’t the only stat that matter for DEs.  🤦🏾‍♂️ 

 

 

I know we have a lot of people on TSW that just follow the ball so if the QB isn't getting sacked then nothing was accomplished in their minds..........but Rousseau is a really good player.    

 

  • Agree 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Johnny Hammersticks said:

Yeah.  Complete slug.  Sacks aren’t the only stat that matter for DEs.  🤦🏾‍♂️ 

 

But he's invisible!!!

 

image.thumb.png.7adc4b3b1b93067ec3a3ac64ff644929.png

 

Posted (edited)

Yes, Groot needs to start earning his pay. Bosa gets a pass right now since hes nursing the hand. Greg has zero excuses at this point. Time to step up.

Edited by Aesop
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

I know we have a lot of people on TSW that just follow the ball so if the QB isn't getting sacked then nothing was accomplished in their minds..........but Rousseau is a really good player.    

 

He is really solid.. but there is a massive jump between the top 3 or 4 pure defensive ends ( not counting Edge rushing outside linebackers )

 

And the fifth to 10th ranked end... He's definitely in that second tier but that's a lot of money for a guy who has stretches of inconsistency 

 

The current run stuff win rate advanced metrics has him outside the top 10 edge despite PFF having him top five as a run stuffer right now 

 

His win rate is under 30% according to advanced metrics .. just outside the top 10.. yes he would look better with Ed on the line

 

He's very good but has never taken that giant step to perennial pro bowler which would really help the bills

 

 

Edited by Buffalo716
Posted
23 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

And the fifth to 10th ranked end... He's definitely in that second tier but that's a lot of money

 

According to Over the Cap and Spotrac, his cap hit is just under 6,000,000 this year.

This places him 53rd among NFL DE's.

If you go with the higher number of cash outlay it puts him around 20th I think.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Simon said:

 

According to Over the Cap and Spotrac, his cap hit is just under 6,000,000 this year.

This places him 53rd among NFL DE's.

I wonder how much it ramps up the next couple years but thanks for the info

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...