UPDATE: ISRAEL V IRAN - Trump just announced we bombed Fordow

[SectionC3]

3 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

It’s the opposite.  
 

You let Iran have them, everyone can have them.  
 

Especially in light of this crisis.  

 

Good thing our immigration policy has been tight the last 4 years.  

And what does it prove if we don't have those sleeper cells?  That all of the hand wringing about the border was BS?  Or that Trump really effed up when he didn't build the big beautiful wall (which MAGA conveniently seems to have forgotten)?  

[JDHillFan]

1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

Interesting thought there.  Drudge has a reference to Iran indicating that the enriched uranium was moved in advance of the site and that there is no leak.  I wonder whether we can determine the success (or lack thereof) of the strike by determining whether there is a radiation spike in the area of the bombings. If there is no spike, does it mean that either that the facility is intact, or that the uranium was moved in advance?  Both options are problems, but especially the second one, because then we're going to have to find out where the eff that uranium is at before it becomes a dirty bomb.  The bet here is that if it was moved, it's in Pakistan.

If uranium was recently moved, Israel knows about it. 

[SectionC3]

1 minute ago, JDHillFan said:

Except that the promise of action is now on the table for states that pursue nukes. We’ll see. 

If you think we're bombing the Saudis when they try to get their hands on one I have a bridge to sell you.  By your logic, too, we should incinerate Dimona next. 

Just now, JDHillFan said:

If uranium was recently moved, Israel knows about it. 

Then they better get it.  Now.  

[Big Blitz]

Just now, ChiGoose said:

 

Countries with nukes generally don’t get invaded. Countries protected by countries with nukes generally don’t get invaded. 

 

 

Oh interesting.  
 

Israel says, what if you just use the terrorist groups you fund to do it?

 

Israel has been bombed for 2 weeks.  
 

How many nukes did they launch?

 

 

Pakistan and India - doesn’t stop them.  
 

Good thing Trump defused that.  

[SectionC3]

1 minute ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

Oh interesting.  
 

Israel says, what if you just use the terrorist groups you fund to do it?

 

Israel has been bombed for 2 weeks.  
 

How many nukes did they launch?

 

 

Pakistan and India - doesn’t stop them.  
 

Good thing Trump defused that.  

Not true.  Action is limited to disputed areas.  Also, Israel has not been invaded by a state actor since the early 70s, at which point I acknowledge that it considered using a nuke.  

[JDHillFan]

1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

If you think we're bombing the Saudis when they try to get their hands on one I have a bridge to sell you.  By your logic, too, we should incinerate Dimona next. 

Then they better get it.  Now.  

Have you seen something that suggests the Saudis are pursuing nukes or are you just being excitable?

 

I just looked at Drudge. The reference you have mentioned also states “State TV claims…”. That is what you are running with? Hoo boy. 

 

 

[aristocrat]

 

[Roundybout]

The only silver lining is that Tucker Carlson and Tulsi Gabbard are probably seething right now 

[ChiGoose]

Any pro-Constitution MAGA rule of law types want to point out that this was blatantly unconstitutional?

[Buddy Hix]

This ***** idiot ran on staying out of wars, lol. Spin the decision, MAGATS!

[SCBills]

2 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

Any pro-Constitution MAGA rule of law types want to point out that this was blatantly unconstitutional?

You can argue about this if you’d like .. and sure, maybe there’s merit, but the left would once again, be taking the 30 side of a 70/30 issue.  
 

Guarantee you that this action polls incredibly well. 

[Big Blitz]

Just now, ChiGoose said:

Any pro-Constitution MAGA rule of law types want to point out that this was blatantly unconstitutional?

 

Your team first.  
 

 

 

[Roundybout]

1 minute ago, SCBills said:

You can argue about this if you’d like .. and sure, maybe there’s merit, but the left would once again, be taking the 30 side of a 70/30 issue.  
 

Guarantee you that this action polls incredibly well. 

Unfortunately you’re right. Strikes like this are red meat for respondents. 
 

Boots on the ground, on the other hand…

[SCBills]

4 minutes ago, Buddy Hix said:

This ***** idiot ran on staying out of wars, lol. Spin the decision, MAGATS!

Are we in a war?  Nope. 

 

If that happens, we can discuss further. 
 

So far, this is a military action and nothing more.   If it spills into regime change and US troops on the ground, sure, would seem contradictory to everything Trump stands for. 
 

Trump 45 literally yeeted dudes off the earth and told us they died like a dog.  No war came of it. 
 

 

Edited 5 hours ago by SCBills

[ChiGoose]

3 minutes ago, SCBills said:

You can argue about this if you’d like .. and sure, maybe there’s merit, but the left would once again, be taking the 30 side of a 70/30 issue.  
 

Guarantee you that this action polls incredibly well. 

“The Constitution doesn’t poll well” is quite the statement. 

[JDHillFan]

5 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

Any pro-Constitution MAGA rule of law types want to point out that this was blatantly unconstitutional?

I got over this issue when Obama went into Libya. He described it as a kinetic action. That’s what we have here.
 

Don’t get me started on Clinton and Sudan. 

[ChiGoose]

1 minute ago, JDHillFan said:

I got over this issue when Obama went into Libya. He described it as a kinetic action. That’s what we have here.
 

Don’t get me started on Clinton and Sudan. 

“I’m over the Constitution. If other people behave badly, why should I have any standards for myself?”

[stevestojan]

Well, in this case I can at least say you Trumpers didn’t get what you voted for  since it took him all of 152 days to break one of his biggest campaign promises. 
 

But I’m sure there’s already posts here spinning that this is somehow different or all sorts of whataboutism. What a ***** disaster. 

[Big Blitz]

 

 

Get her out of here

 

 

 

But go Ukraine!

[nedboy7]

20 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

The only silver lining is that Tucker Carlson and Tulsi Gabbard are probably seething right now 

 and the proud deuchebags 

5 minutes ago, stevestojan said:

Well, in this case I can at least say you Trumpers didn’t get what you voted for  since it took him all of 152 days to break one of his biggest campaign promises. 
 

But I’m sure there’s already posts here spinning that this is somehow different or all sorts of whataboutism. What a ***** disaster. 

You see he’s playing 5d checkers and you have TDS.