JDHillFan Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 48 minutes ago, billsfan_34 said: You describe psychosis to a tee! PS I’m a psych nurse now. This guy is out of his mind. Zero reasoning and reality whatsoever smh 🤦♂️ Now do redhawk/joefergusonforever. I’m begging you! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan_34 Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 1 minute ago, JDHillFan said: Now do redhawk/joefergusonforever. I’m begging you! I do believe I have seen some of those posts…hmmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 2 hours ago, sherpa said: The more you post, the more goofy you get. Bizarre judgement. Idiotic accusations. Refusal to acknowledge reality. Refusal to back up wacky claims. Ignorant lack of understanding of the US military or the Administration's options regarding that. It goes on and on. You are not even making sense anymore How can an isolationist congress be strong in foreign affairs? That's stupid 2 hours ago, JDHillFan said: https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/education/trivia/buck-stops-here-sign Truman was a douche. He should have just blamed whatever came along on congress. Go Brando Go! away Truman got the congress behind him. Marshall Plan got through congress, so did aide to Greece and Turkey when threatened with Russian aggression. You support an isolationist. That's the definition of foreign policy weekness Prove otherwise, or shut your obvious ignorant mouth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDHillFan Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You are not even making sense anymore How can an isolationist congress be strong in foreign affairs? That's stupid Truman got the congress behind him. Marshall Plan got through congress, so did aide to Greece and Turkey when threatened with Russian aggression. You support an isolationist. That's the definition of foreign policy weekness Prove otherwise, or shut your obvious ignorant mouth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 7 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: We can agree that isolationism is weakness, correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokebball Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: We can agree that isolationism is weakness, correct? Isolationism, is that what Biden is doing to Texas? Yeah, I agree it's weakness 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 Just now, Pokebball said: Isolationism, is that what Biden is doing to Texas? Yeah, I agree it's weakness Biden isn't fighting against a solution in congress, Trump is 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan_34 Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 18 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You are not even making sense anymore How can an isolationist congress be strong in foreign affairs? That's stupid Truman got the congress behind him. Marshall Plan got through congress, so did aide to Greece and Turkey when threatened with Russian aggression. You support an isolationist. That's the definition of foreign policy weekness Prove otherwise, or shut your obvious ignorant mouth An isolationist chooses not to get involved in other groups or countries internal affairs. I’m not sure that meets the criteria of foreign policy weakness. For instance; perhaps the US decided to up oil production for domestic use, not rely on OPEC (specifically N. Africa and the Middle East) and get our troops home then we would be in a stronger position. Personally, I am ok without having to worrying about protecting and expending resources in the Persian Gulf/Red Sea to protect black gold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDHillFan Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 12 minutes ago, Tiberius said: We can agree that isolationism is weakness, correct? I’m just agreeing with you that Biden is impotent and incapable of leading. Isn’t that the case you are making? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 19 minutes ago, Tiberius said: We can agree that isolationism is weakness, correct? LOL! Who wants isolationism? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sherpa Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 27 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You are not even making sense anymore How can an isolationist congress be strong in foreign affairs? Truman got the congress behind him. Marshall Plan got through congress, so did aide to Greece and Turkey when threatened with Russian aggression. You support an isolationist. That's the definition of foreign policy weekness Prove otherwise, or shut your obvious ignorant mouth Not making sense to you is an accolade. Congress is not isolationist, and even if they were, it would have no restraint on the President's ability to respond to Iran. What Congress is doing; what has been done for years, makes perfect sense. The Administration wants to support Ukraine. Congress does as well. They also want to support Israel. But....Pay attention to this, because you seem to be completely ignorant of how the sausage is made, Congress wants a firm stand against the border invasion, and is linking aid to that issue. Perfect sense. Perfect logic and in our best interests, and has nothing to do with a response to Iran. Nothing. What you post about me doesn't concern me. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capco Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 30 minutes ago, Tiberius said: How can an isolationist congress be strong in foreign affairs? That's stupid Truman got the congress behind him. Marshall Plan got through congress, so did aide to Greece and Turkey when threatened with Russian aggression. You support an isolationist. That's the definition of foreign policy weakness The reactions on the right are... confusing. If Biden retaliates, then he's just an arm of the military-industrial complex. If Biden doesn't retaliate strongly enough, then he makes us look weak and shows the need for a "strongman" in the White House. If Biden uses it as support for a broader plan to curtail US interventionism, then he's a foreign policy nightmare destabilizing the world order. Like... what's the baby-bear Goldilocks response that's "just right"? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 1 minute ago, Capco said: The reactions on the right are... confusing. If Biden retaliates, then he's just an arm of the military-industrial complex. If Biden doesn't retaliate strongly enough, then he makes us look weak and shows the need for a "strongman" in the White House. If Biden uses it as support for a broader plan to curtail US interventionism, then he's a foreign policy nightmare destabilizing the world order. Like... what's the baby-bear Goldilocks response that's "just right"? No one is saying not to retaliate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capco Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 On 1/28/2024 at 12:08 PM, billsfan_34 said: 21 year retired Marine here. It is time to bring our men and women home. Let the indigenous folks duke it out. The military industrial complex and our foreign policy on both sides of the aisle sucks. It was in the very first reply, @Doc. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sherpa Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 3 minutes ago, Doc said: No one is saying not to retaliate. Like it or not, there has to be a retaliation, and it must be strong. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sherpa Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 By the way, and from a tactical viewpoint--not that anyone here cares about this stuff.... The excuse for the penetration and fatal attack was that the US had it's air defenses standing down as it was expecting to recover a friendly drone. Transponders are built for this very purpose. In strike planning, we always built an evacuation route, complete with transponder codes that identified us a friendly. We build multi million dollar drones and don't give them a box that ID's them as friendly to protect their egress. I'm not familiar with what is being done here, but it seems like an obvious oversight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 43 minutes ago, Capco said: It was in the very first reply, @Doc. OK I stand corrected. One person doesn't want to retaliate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokebball Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Biden isn't fighting against a solution in congress, Trump is Biden reduced rules that existed when he took office and he isn't enforcing existing laws to protect the border and Texas, leaving Texas vulnerable. Biden has caused the problems that are causing the least secure border in our history. Biden is the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 2 hours ago, billsfan_34 said: I’m a psych nurse now. so what psych dx do you label the leading R prez candidate with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 1 hour ago, billsfan_34 said: An isolationist chooses not to get involved in other groups or countries internal affairs. I’m not sure that meets the criteria of foreign policy weakness. For instance; perhaps the US decided to up oil production for domestic use, not rely on OPEC (specifically N. Africa and the Middle East) and get our troops home then we would be in a stronger position. Personally, I am ok without having to worrying about protecting and expending resources in the Persian Gulf/Red Sea to protect black gold. Not doing anything is weakness, yes. 55 minutes ago, sherpa said: Not making sense to you is an accolade. Congress is not isolationist, and even if they were, it would have no restraint on the President's ability to respond to Iran. What Congress is doing; what has been done for years, makes perfect sense. The Administration wants to support Ukraine. Congress does as well. They also want to support Israel. But....Pay attention to this, because you seem to be completely ignorant of how the sausage is made, Congress wants a firm stand against the border invasion, and is linking aid to that issue. Perfect sense. Perfect logic and in our best interests, and has nothing to do with a response to Iran. Nothing. What you post about me doesn't concern me. MAGA is isolationist, stop being stupid They have refused to aid Ukraine and Israel, that's because of Trump That's weak 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts