Jump to content

Cancel all groomers


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


So your opposition is to 12 year olds being able to get therapy without consent of their parents?

You are so ***** stupid it’s shocking… seriously shocking .

 

 

and you aren’t??? Wtf kind of parent could you be? 

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

You are so ***** stupid it’s shocking… seriously shocking 


I’m literally just trying to figure out what your issue is.

 

Based on the text of the law you cited, it seems to be an objection to 12 year olds getting therapy without their parents consent, unless I’m missing something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

You are so ***** stupid it’s shocking… seriously shocking .

 

 

and you aren’t??? Wtf kind of parent could you be? 

No, I'm not.  Especially if an opinion from several(?) clinicians is required.  I think it was more than 1.  The kids have questions.  Better answers from someone trained than the girls basketball coach.  Good lord.  Ever watched a girls basketball game?  They foul each other every 15 secs.

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:


I’m literally just trying to figure out what your issue is.

 

Based on the text of the law you cited, it seems to be an objection to 12 year olds getting therapy without their parents consent, unless I’m missing something. 


are you ok with you kids getting “therapy” without your involvement? 
 

what if the teacher decides your kid needs some MAGA therapy- you good? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


are you ok with you kids getting “therapy” without your involvement? 
 

what if the teacher decides your kid needs some MAGA therapy- you good? 

if the kid wants MAGA therapy he/she can readily obtain it from Charlie Kirk without consent.  Or Hillsdale College for that matter.  Record setting team of Chester Marcol.

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


are you ok with you kids getting “therapy” without your involvement? 
 

what if the teacher decides your kid needs some MAGA therapy- you good? 


Under the text of that law, my kid would never end up getting therapy without my involvement. As a loving and supportive parent, I want to foster an environment where they can come to me if they have any issues and we can address them together, with or without therapy. 

 

They’d only be able to get therapy without my involvement if I was such a jackass that a professional thought they would cause themselves or others serious harm or were the victim of abuse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Especially if an opinion from several(?) clinicians is required.  I think it was more than 1.

Not mentioned in the legalese whatsoever. Why pretend it is?

Edited by JDHillFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


Under the text of that law, my kid would never end up getting therapy without my involvement. As a loving and supportive parent, I want to foster an environment where they can come to me if they have any issues and we can address them together, with or without therapy. 

 

They’d only be able to get therapy without my involvement if I was such a jackass that a professional thought they would cause themselves or others serious harm or were the victim of abuse. 

 Wrong/ you only need someone to decide you shouldn’t be involved. You are so naive…. So childishly unaware of what these sort of rules can mean.
 

Just remember your stupid naive acquiesce to these ideals pave the way to you crying in you driveway saying how could this happen.

 

wake up! 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 Wrong/ you only need someone to decide you shouldn’t be involved. You are so naive…. So childishly unaware of what these sort of rules can mean.
 

Just remember your stupid naive acquiesce to these ideals pave the way to you crying in you driveway saying how could this happen.

 

wake up! 


I’m just reading the text of the law you cited, buddy. Please point to where in the law it says that anyone can just take my kid away from me for no reason. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


I’m just reading the text of the law you cited, buddy. Please point to where in the law it says that anyone can just take my kid away from me for no reason. 

What? For the seventh time it says your 12 year old can opt for medical treatment with out you. 
 

you are ok with that right??? 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


I’m just reading the text of the law you cited, buddy. Please point to where in the law it says that anyone can just take my kid away from me for no reason. 


If a woman calls the police because she was punched by husband or boyfriend and children were present in the house CPS comes takes the children away because of domestic abuse so let’s not pretend there won’t be overreaction because it already exists 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Groomer Alert !

 

 


Here is the keynote speaker at this weekends Moms for Hitler Summit advocating for  i n c e s t:

 

Why hasn’t Bonnie and Karen Psyop condemned this hate group of groomers? 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

What? For the seventh time it says your 12 year old can opt for medical treatment with out you. 
 

you are ok with that right??? 

Pls copy and paste that part of the document or cite the chapters and verse.

15 minutes ago, Commsvet11 said:


If a woman calls the police because she was punched by husband or boyfriend and children were present in the house CPS comes takes the children away because of domestic abuse so let’s not pretend there won’t be overreaction because it already exists 

Is that overreaction?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh boy a bunch of ignored Trump memes should help. (Seriously has anyone ever met someone like BT?… im thinking Simpsons comic book guy or paper boy) 

6 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Pls copy and paste that part of the document or cite the chapters and verse.

Is that overreaction?


 

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

 

AB 665, as amended, Wendy Carrillo. Minors: consent to mental health services.

Existing law, for some purposes, authorizes a minor who is 12 years of age or older to consent to mental health treatment 

Ok now what ? 

You’re sick people. Stop transing the kids

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is what I see but admittedly, my eyesight sucks

Existing law, for some purposes, authorizes a minor who is 12 years of age or older to consent to mental health treatment or counseling on an outpatient basis, or to residential shelter services, if the minor is mature enough to participate intelligently in the outpatient services or residential shelter services, as specified, and either the minor would present a danger of serious physical or mental harm to themselves or to others or if the minor is the alleged victim of ***** or child abuse. For other purposes, existing law authorizes a minor who is 12 years of age or older to consent to mental health treatment or counseling services if the minor is mature enough to participate intelligently in the outpatient services or counseling services. 

This bill would align the existing laws by removing the additional requirement that, in order to consent to mental health treatment or counseling on an outpatient basis, or to residential shelter services, the minor must present a danger of serious physical or mental harm to themselves or to others, or be the alleged victim of ***** or child abuse.

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...