Jump to content

Submarine meant to view Titanic wreck loses contact at bottom of sea


Nextmanup

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, NoSaint said:


it’s probably as simple as “we think it’s highly likely” vs “we absolutely know”

The Navy essentially said this in every article. They were 100% correct in waiting for confirmation. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This story once again mirrors what I said about Terry Pegula in the hot topic thread on the main board, about him re-upping Beane & McD when there was absolutely no need to do so, and that is that even though these guys (on this sub) were very wealthy, they weren't too smart. The LACK of proper QC/testing on the initial build, and especially, the ongoing maintenence & testing, of that vessel was stunning. Seems pretty clear that repeated trips down below weakened the hull/whole thing, and that caused it to go kablooey. A very sad situation, and totally preventable (with proper ongoing maintenance & testing/QC). Of course the latter costs money, and I'm not even sure the company had/has the proper hi tech tools needed to determine the structural integrity of the hull and other components. Titanic movie guy James Cameron says the same thing, but anybody breathing air with an IQ above 50 will come to the same conclusion.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sherpa said:

 

What exactly are you inferring?

That an alien craft was also near the Titanic

Kim Kardashian blew up the sub with a fart

They faked their death to move to Mexico and marry Thai hookers

The US government banned putting really small inferior napkins and knives in fork/spoon/knife/napkins.

 

Anything is possible but this story getting so much traction and the knowledge it blew up a few days ago being hidden, I'm sure there is something hidden we don't know about, Shirley.

 

I don't watch or pay attention to the news/media/world so I dunno what's going on. I just binge Rick & Morty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NoSaint said:


it’s probably as simple as “we think it’s highly likely” vs “we absolutely know”

But people can't handle that!

1 hour ago, boyst said:

The story hid a bunch of other crap, more importantly. 

Boo hoo.  Luck of the draw. Who's murder got hid by 911? 

 

Some people get all the breaks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

But people can't handle that!

Boo hoo.  Luck of the draw. Who's murder got hid by 911? 

 

Some people get all the breaks.

That politician who was thought to have killed that girl, chaundra levy maybe? That was wiped away quick even though it was found he didn't do it a while later. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, boyst said:

That politician who was thought to have killed that girl, chaundra levy maybe? That was wiped away quick even though it was found he didn't do it a while later. 

Nature of the news cycle.

 

I don't think the Navy had any grand conspiracy plans.  They had to follow things logically.  Is a 96 hour window really too much to wait for?

 

 

Edited by ExiledInIllinois
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

Nature of the news cycle.

 

I don't think the Navy had any grand conspiracy plans.  They had to follow things logically.  Is a 96 hour window really too much to wait for?

 

 

I am not saying this is on the Navy solely.

 

It's on the media who stirred up a frenzy on this and got everyone invested for clicks. Drug up anyone who ever watched James Cameron Titanic, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

Nature of the news cycle.

 

I don't think the Navy had any grand conspiracy plans.  

 

 

 

The Navy doesn't have a conspiracy component.

They do what they are tasked to do, and busy enough with that. 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

Yeah, NYT had a similar article this morning.  Apparently the CEO referred to the company internally as "SpaceX of the sea".  Their whole business model was to sell tickets to the wealthy (nothing wrong with that, of course), and provide these boutique experiences.  Initially the price was $100k +/-, where the actually number represented -- get this -- the original price of a first class ticket on the Titanic, but was adjusted for inflation.  You just can't make this stuff up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Bob Jones said:

This story once again mirrors what I said about Terry Pegula in the hot topic thread on the main board, about him re-upping Beane & McD when there was absolutely no need to do so, and that is that even though these guys (on this sub) were very wealthy, they weren't too smart. The LACK of proper QC/testing on the initial build, and especially, the ongoing maintenence & testing, of that vessel was stunning. Seems pretty clear that repeated trips down below weakened the hull/whole thing, and that caused it to go kablooey. A very sad situation, and totally preventable (with proper ongoing maintenance & testing/QC). Of course the latter costs money, and I'm not even sure the company had/has the proper hi tech tools needed to determine the structural integrity of the hull and other components. Titanic movie guy James Cameron says the same thing, but anybody breathing air with an IQ above 50 will come to the same conclusion.

 

44 minutes ago, Doc said:

James Cameron theorizes that because it was a CF composite, micro-defects occurred with each dive and it was only a matter of time before it imploded.

Yep. That’s exactly what I said yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Doc said:

James Cameron theorizes that because it was a CF composite, micro-defects occurred with each dive and it was only a matter of time before it imploded.

He's still a douche because he's not an expert on this subject despite being touted as one. 

  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...